create account

Optimally distributing curation power by ntomaino

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com
· @ntomaino · (edited)
$5.17
Optimally distributing curation power
Many would agree the main challenge for the Steem community right now is how to fairly reward content creators in a way that is best for the growth and engagement of the protocol.

https://steemimg.com/images/2016/09/08/giphyb9f45.gif

Fairly rewarding creators is dependent on optimally distributing curation power. On Steem right now the fundamental problem is curation power is not optimally distributed.  I wanted to take some time to address the origin of the problem and suggest a few potential solutions.

# The founders, early miners and investors of Steem control curation  power and most either don’t want the power or are not skilled at curating

@ned, @dan, @jamesc, @ben, @berniesanders, @smooth, @val-a, and @tombstone and a few others have the vast majority of curating power on Steem as a result of being involved early in the project and owning a lot of Steem power. This has become a big problem because some of these people do not want to have this power (@jamesc, @ben, and @mottler are not even active curators) and others are not good at it (preventing growth because they don’t attract the best content creators and surface the best content to the community). 

There are exceptions that take their curations power very seriously and do a great job (@smooth being the best example IMO) but I generally don’t believe curation power was thought through thoroughly when Steem was created. Optimally allocating curation power will be improved in the future, either in a new network like Synereo (which is being more thoughtful about curation powers at the start) or via a natural redistribution on Steem. 

# Will the origins of curation power fatally doom Steem?

I don't think this will be the fatal flaw of Steem. It's very possible that curation powers get redistributed naturally and through community initiatives.

It may happen naturally as whales that don't want to curate power down and others that value and are good at curating buy up Steem power.

It may also happen through the community as initiatives like the [Robinhood Whale](https://steemit.com/steem/@repholder/the-robinhood-whale-initiave-community-feedback-needed) and @curie emerge to get curation power in the hands of people that both want to curate and are good at it. 

 # I hope that others will continue to think about how to optimally distribute curation power. It needs to be done for a decentralized social network to go mainstream and while we've got the best shot for now, that window may be closing!

___


http://i.imgsafe.org/7347989cc0.png

* Follow me on [Twitter](https://twitter.com/NTmoney)
👍  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorntomaino
permlinkoptimally-distributing-curation-power
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem","steemit","crypto-news"],"users":["ned","dan","jamesc","ben","berniesanders","smooth","val-a","tombstone","mottler","curie"],"image":["https://steemimg.com/images/2016/09/08/giphyb9f45.gif","http://i.imgsafe.org/7347989cc0.png"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steem/@repholder/the-robinhood-whale-initiave-community-feedback-needed","https://twitter.com/NTmoney"]}
created2016-09-08 21:48:27
last_update2016-09-09 21:06:06
depth0
children5
last_payout2016-10-10 14:03:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value3.975 HBD
curator_payout_value1.194 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted2.000 HBD
body_length2,600
author_reputation19,085,142,785,364
root_title"Optimally distributing curation power"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,177,520
net_rshares5,741,626,043,698
author_curate_reward""
vote details (32)
@beanz ·
A system for this was suggested by @dantheman a few weeks ago, I think it's just taking time for them to work out how to implement it properly.

Read about it [here](https://steemit.com/steem/@dantheman/people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards) and [here](https://steemit.com/steemit/@dantheman/follow-up-to-people-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-rewards).
properties (22)
authorbeanz
permlinkre-ntomaino-optimally-distributing-curation-power-20160909t131008012z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"users":["dantheman"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steem/@dantheman/people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards","https://steemit.com/steemit/@dantheman/follow-up-to-people-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-rewards"]}
created2016-09-09 13:10:09
last_update2016-09-09 13:10:09
depth1
children1
last_payout2016-10-10 14:03:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length388
author_reputation77,215,574,122,930
root_title"Optimally distributing curation power"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,183,984
net_rshares0
@ntomaino ·
Good stuff thanks for sharing. Hadn't seen these ideas and think this is a good direction. Basically I think Reputation on Steemit should represent curation power rather than Steem Power. Steem Power is earned by mining, an activity that has no relationship with curation. Reputation is earned by contributing good content -- which is a much better proxy for being good at curating.
properties (22)
authorntomaino
permlinkre-beanz-re-ntomaino-optimally-distributing-curation-power-20160909t203737668z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-09-09 20:37:33
last_update2016-09-09 20:37:33
depth2
children0
last_payout2016-10-10 14:03:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length382
author_reputation19,085,142,785,364
root_title"Optimally distributing curation power"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,188,646
net_rshares0
@dennygalindo ·
If whales abstained for one day we would have great curation rewards
👍  ,
properties (23)
authordennygalindo
permlinkre-ntomaino-optimally-distributing-curation-power-20160909t151138041z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-09-09 15:11:36
last_update2016-09-09 15:11:36
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-10-10 14:03:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length68
author_reputation6,552,498,469,686
root_title"Optimally distributing curation power"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,185,171
net_rshares23,381,785,660
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@mindhunter ·
$0.03
I've given up on curation rewards already, and just comment on my content gains alone. Gaining a 0.0001 SP curation reward is not my cup of tea. Horses for courses though - it may work for some people.
👍  
properties (23)
authormindhunter
permlinkre-ntomaino-optimally-distributing-curation-power-20160908t221803541z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-09-08 22:18:06
last_update2016-09-08 22:18:06
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-10-10 14:03:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.022 HBD
curator_payout_value0.007 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length201
author_reputation203,929,529,404,460
root_title"Optimally distributing curation power"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,177,850
net_rshares80,979,236,171
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@timcliff ·
Here is a potential solution to he problem :)

<a href="https://steemit.com/curation/@timcliff/human-vs-bot-curators-introducing-human-competition-into-the-equation-allow-whales-to-delegate-curation-power-to-dolphins-and">Human vs. Bot Curators - Introducing Human Competition into the Equation - Allow Whales to Delegate Curation Power to Dolphins and Minnows</a>
properties (22)
authortimcliff
permlinkre-ntomaino-optimally-distributing-curation-power-20160909t205754937z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"links":["https://steemit.com/curation/@timcliff/human-vs-bot-curators-introducing-human-competition-into-the-equation-allow-whales-to-delegate-curation-power-to-dolphins-and"]}
created2016-09-09 20:57:54
last_update2016-09-09 20:57:54
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-10-10 14:03:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length364
author_reputation272,954,445,077,789
root_title"Optimally distributing curation power"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,188,892
net_rshares0