<html>
<p>One bitcoin users, make a mistake when sending a number of bitcoin transactions. Someone by the name of <a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=966632">Voiceeeeee</a>, expressed the problem in <a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1818791.msg18116235#msg18116235">bitcointalk forum</a>. He admits, the fund is a savings fund for college needs.</p>
<p>At that time, Voiceeeeee intends to send a total of 0.24701244 BTC on two output address, on 8 March. On the details of the transaction, the transaction size of 2051 bytes, and the listed value of 121,891.76 fee per byte satoshi. So of course, true that the total fee it reached a total of 2.5 BTC.</p>
<p><img src="https://s9.postimg.org/9dxcb2ufz/fee.png" width="1024" height="440"/></p>
<p> Voiceeeeee transaction details, fee on transactions worth 2.5 BTC</p>
<p>Then, with a big enough fee, any transaction is indeed able to mouse-button relative to the time more quickly. But Voiceeeee seems just realized the mistake he had made, and immediately post on forums asking for help.</p>
<p>When the complaint was submitted on the forum Bitcointalk shortly after learning his mistake, he got advice from other forum members that help solve the problems that. One with the name <a href="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=120694">xhomerx10</a>, then tried to help by creating a support ticket to the Bitmain. Search how can conclude that the transaction is closely related with the Bitmain, of course it can be easily traced.</p>
<p>We certainly still remember, that all of the transactions in the bitcoin, stored in a block-block recently produced an average of every 10 minutes by the miners. So, the next processing block miners recently is valid, it will earn reward block and all fee transactions that are in the new block.</p>
<p>In this case, the transaction with ID <a href="https://blockchain.info/tx/4d45a14ee7320b97bafd550d60df1a1be524f3cfc8ca1ea6295279eeb7026aff">4d45a14ee73 ... ... ... ... ....</a> included in the block with the number # 456363. While in the new block, succeeded on the relay by AntPool, a pool hosts from Bitmain. Because blockchain are open ledger and is accessible by the public, then the detail detail block can be traced.</p>
<p><img src="https://s24.postimg.org/6fw06qm1h/Salah_Kirim_Transaksi_Dengan_Fee_Besar_2_1024x53.png" width="1024" height="539"/></p>
<p> Block that contains the transaction Voiceeeeee, produced by Antpool.</p>
<p>Work done by Xhomerx10 by submitting a support ticket to Bitmain, is to recount the detail and chronological problems because of such transactions. As a result, the party soon to coordinate with Bitmain pool besutannya, AntPool. According to the parties Bitmain, transaction error is purely the fault of the users themselves.</p>
<p>Bitmain party, describes the reward fees earned from the new block numbered #456363, has been fully distributed to the participants of mining at the pool AntPool. Of course, with the typical pattern of the pool using the PPS and PPLNS, then the reward results soon may be distributed to all participants of mining.</p>
<p><img src="https://s3.postimg.org/7luxrmwb7/Salah_Kirim_Transaksi.png" width="1024" height="371"/></p>
<p> Responses from Parties to Bitmain</p>
<p>In case of wrong send a transaction like this, if the mistake was due to the fault of the user himself, it is no longer possible to try to get back the fee transaction. Bitmainany party found enough spare it until the bias case.</p>
<p>The fate of the peace Voiceeeeee in this event. Though Bitmain realize that the faultis a fault that the sender of the transaction itself, but the Bitmain, decided to replace it. As a result, on March 14, and then, in the Address property of the Voiceeeee, managed to receive back a 2.5 BTC.</p>
<p><img src="https://s27.postimg.org/62iz2luyr/Salah_Kirim_Transaksi_balik.png" width="660" height="330"/></p>
<p>Voiceeeeee receive 2.5 BTC from Address 1L75eRMgeCwAxEjD1oWXjLgud9jxwxm34u</p>
<p>If your search even further, the sender's Address is, 1L75eRMgeCwAxEjD1oWXjLgud9jxwxm34u. While in the address it, recent transactions much related to transactioncoinbase (creation of a new unit of the bitcoin). So it's a pretty strong hunch that address it is address belongs to Antpool from Bitmain, which was previously intendedto replace a transaction error.</p>
<p><img src="https://s4.postimg.org/8ni1kamfx/Salah_Kirim_Transaksi_Dengan_Fee_Besar_5_1024x54.png" width="1024" height="543"/></p>
<p> </p>
<p>The address is often receive transactions coinbase (transaction for reward new blockmarked with no input).</p>
<p>Of events wrong send this transaction, we certainly can take a lot of things, so that in the future, when performing transactions shall full precision bitcoin, in order not to repeat the mistakes that occur. The display Windows of what befell Voiceeeeee, still fared well if it turns out the party Bitmain want to replace errors are not made byhis side or Antpool. What if the pool does not want to replace? Of course we have to bear the consequence of its own over the mistakes that we make on its own.</p>
<p> While on the other hand, we can see for themselves the benefits of the bitcoin transactions recording so transparent. So, what Xhomerx10 and others, to be able to try to help resolve the problem. It's all easy to do, since the recording of transactions in the blockchain is indeed quite transparent, detail, and cannot be manipulated. Likewise also in this event, the Bitmain and the Antpool, can also browse the details of transactions that occur. When did see the details of the transaction with fee 2.5 BTC. </p>
</html>
hiveblocks