These are the three primary learning modalities. They only have a peripheral role in the thinking processes. The voices inside the head are brought on from subvocalizations via the pathetic reading lessons in the warehousing indoctrination centers.

Kinesthetic children are the largest group and the most maligned and misunderstood. They learn better being in a group with other kinesthetic children. They enjoy being physically close to each other and can they ever sing. They are also and unfortunately the early age candidates for Methylphenidate.

They learn best when having something physical to facilitate their mental clarity and focus. I almost always recommend therapeutic handballs.

Thinking skills come through facilitating communications. Hovercraft parents need not apply. Infants are the original multi-taskers. They lack a refined system of logic to connect the dots. When they become toddlers, bad parenting sets in and chaos enters the child's life, and their original thought processes are shattered, and groupthink is introduced.

Children who receive unconditional love into toddler time become automatically more cogent than their peers. One of the most vital steps of teaching children, apart from motor skills and eye-hand-mind coordination, is that of various drawing activities.

Finger painting is exciting, regardless of the primary learning modality. The first episode should utilize teaching how to make secondary colors. By quizzing the child after the artistry, the expression of ideas is fostered. Remember that drawing preceded alphabets and written language. A fabulous reference source is the pioneer, Elizabeth Hurlock.

I am a hard-core visual, and my two passions are sustainable living and anthropology and how culture affects peoples' lives. My primary focus is working with children "diagnosed" as having ADD/ADHD and getting them off of the Methylphenidate.

this is just deep thinking

brother @paps
you are amazing

Thanks for the great content @paps! 

I actually really like the way you said it:
I think this can really be used in education. If the parents and the education system can find how the kids think they can also move them into the direction that they will excel in and also enjoy more.

Let's see how the direction in the future will be then!!!

Keep the great content and looking forward to next!

Best
Francesco

![Screen Shot 2017-09-18 at 18.14.37.png](https://steemitimages.com/DQmQp99cNgrkAGeWjm7iCZNL1Lq8SJyXnCMdgsYtSzkzhep/Screen%20Shot%202017-09-18%20at%2018.14.37.png)

Upvoted the long post by @aedroberts. It was as interesting a read as your post, and your comment wanted his to climb up the post ladder. "I think" that people put to many restrictions on thoughts and processes of all types and kinds. 3 thinking methods, 4 dimensions, 5 senses,  6 sides of a cube. I think all restrictions that popular science/society places are wrong. And I do mean all. Just my opinion, and I am sure the scientist, doctors, lawyers, politicians, and good hearted peoples of society know more than I do, after all I only think lucidly, and dream lucidly, and read lucidly. So I don't fit very well in any of Polite Societies Boxes. 
Still it was a very good read. and so I upvoted your post also.

Hahaha... really love the post i think i am visual thinker

great work

Interesting post, thank you for sharing it. I am a qualified primary school teacher in the UK. I can assure you that, in education, we do already pay very close attention to ways of thinking , as well as learning styles. This is essential for inclusion of all students. I think you will find this is the case in most countries.

Sorry I cannot upvote as my vote is worthless until it regenerates.

interesting post!

This gem of a post was discovered by the OCD Team! 

**Reply to this comment** if you accept, and are willing to let us share your gem of a post! By accepting this, you have a chance to receive extra rewards and one of your photos in this article may be used in our compilation post! 

You can follow @ocd – learn more about the project and see other _Gems_! We strive for transparency.

Found you on Facebook steemit group. Upvoted you.

Excellent post @paps . I belong to the first category. I am a Visual Thinker . I appreciate your suggestion that even the parents and  education system should study kid's thinking and then try to make them learn accordingly so that they grab it soon.

**This is a good post, I really like it

"Learn from yesterday, live for today, and hope for tomorrow. The important thing is not to stop asking. "Albert Einstein

I'm definitely visual thinker :)

For sure auditory thinker :) Maybe that why I have a podcast? LOL

Man I'm totally a kinesthetic thinker.. and my girl is completely visual, sometimes we struggle communicating our ideas precisely because we think in two different ways. I'm going to resteem this post man.... Fantastic you deserve more exposure

Now that I think about it hahaha...

I have observed how I 'think' - none of these 'modes' seem to be more dominate than the other for me. But there is a pattern and order... maybe others can relate to this -

I find I start with that 'associative feeling', as if you know the solution or answer but need to put it into words - kinda like the feeling you get when you know something but have temporally forgot it. I lock in on that feeling, then comes a flood of visual images with what sounds like 'mental mumbling'. I like your 'search engine' analogy - I'm conscious of the process, but i don't "steer" it so-to-speak.

This post recieved an upvote from minnowpond. If you would like to recieve upvotes from minnowpond on all your posts, simply FOLLOW @minnowpond

Great post. You made a good point about applying this in education. Schools systems usually treat every student the same which is why many never flourish. I am a language teacher, and I always take these three different styles into consideration when teaching in order to accommodate all types of learners. Personally, I am a visual thinker which explains why I was a designer before I became a teacher!

Hey, nice post! For me, it is a mix of all three but most of the time the 2nd case is prevalent: I like to find connections between things, and how they relate to emotions. I think it is *useful* and *beautiful* to find hidden qualities in something and connect it to something else.
>They really excel at cooking, software engineering, math, programming and stuff involved pattern seeking. 

You see, I studied maths, I have an MsC in s software engineering & programming, my work is about data, stats and patterns, and I love cooking (well... I love to *watch* someone cooking and then taste it!)

Anyway, the education reference in the end is very interesting and I will keep that in mind for my kids. Thanks!

I can see now what type of thinker I am. I usually see pictures all the time

@originalworks

good post that i can learn from it. hope to see more

I am more a pattern thinker. Very informative article.

i think, i'm visual thinker... 
imagine first then feel it :D 
nice post bro!