Censorship is an important topic to discuss presently. We are seeing the continual rise in censorship with no signs of it being pulled back. The freedom to speak is eroding, not only on social media but in the real world as well. 

It's not just somebody on the computer posting something that's being censored and having their post deleted on say Facebook or twitter. Or someone making a video and it being deleted on YouTube. It's not just random unverifiable baseless claims that can't be backed up. There is real information can be sourced that is being denied the opportunity to be known.

When it relates to the alleged pandemic around covid-19, censorship is at its highest. You can be an expert in your field and be censored because being an expert in knowing what you're talking about doesn't matter anymore. You can cite and reference experts, and that doesn't matter. If you dare to speak against the official narrative that is being paraded globally, what you say will be censored and if you continue, you will eventually be banned from the platform.

You can even reference something the WHO says themselves, that someone working for the WHO says, or an official document from the WHO, and because it does not align with the official mainstream narrative, it will be censored under alleged medical misinformation. It's really ridiculous.

An example of an expert being censored, is Dr. Claire Craig. She is a diagnostic pathologist and recently spoke out about the censorship of scientists who don't go along with the belief in the official mainstream narrative. Here's what one tweet set about an interview she had on UK's talk radio:

https://i.imgur.com/Luykto9.jpg

> Diagnostic pathologist Dr Claire Craig is concerned about the censorship of scientists who are lockdown sceptics.

> "I've been censored and it's really really wrong. That's not science. That is dogma. That is a cult. That is a religion".

https://twitter.com/talkRADIO/status/1382003198190292992

In his brief interview clip, she is asked how concerned she is about divergent scientific voices. Because this is really important in a freethinking society that wants to know what actually is true. Given you have an issue where there is an official narrative that the authorities demand you accept as real, and you have actual experts in their field to can reference data and their experience in reality to point out flaws, inconsistencies or outright falsities in the claims of the official narrative, if you only hear from people who support the official narrative when you not gonna know if it's actually true or false.

If something is true, then it will bear the fruit of such a truthful reality because it is true. If the official mainstream narrative is true, then any and all criticism should be welcome in order to further demonstrate how the opposition is wrong and false. But instead, the authorities in the mainstream, such as in government, such as on social media, such as in the mainstream media, all they want to do is censor the opposing information that contradicts what they want people to believe.

This is not how you arrive at truth or allow truth to be discovered. If there is merit in opposing information than the only way you will know if the opposing information is true is if you allow it to be spoken and be known to others to determine if that is the case. Otherwise, you can just make up whatever you want and push it as the truth and I will be the only information people will have to believe is true.

This is not what a free society does. This is not what a society based in reality and truth dives. This is what liars, manipulators and deceivers want from a society.

In the interview they are referencing a recent censorship and banning of a scientific person named Denis Rancourt who had been publishing data on Research Gate to combat the false narrative supported by various 'authorities' in government, medicine, science, social media and mainstream media. The gatekeepers couldn't allow him to continue, so after repeated warnings about his activities not being permitted on research gate, research gate finally banned him.

That's what our society has come to. If what he was saying was false, then demonstrate it. But instead of actually countering information that is destroying the official narrative of lies, they just censor and ban people to prevent them from having a platform to reach people and inform them of what is actually happening.