create account

Linearity testing by ptsouth97

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com
· @ptsouth97 ·
$2.73
Linearity testing
<center>![ccd.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmU2AWJkPEcsSEsTMSzCMkPv6Asd6XHQqTU8Zo4WQRawRh/ccd.png)</center>
<center>*Figure 1. CCD bucket analogy.  Credit:  Howell 2006*</center>

Each pixel of a CCD sensor is like a bucket, but instead of collecting rain water, these buckets collect electrons that are generated by the incoming photons. &nbsp;Just like a bucket can only hold a finite volume of water, a pixel can only collect a finite number of electrons before it "overflows." &nbsp;When the bucket overflows, the measurement of &nbsp;the electrons is no longer linear. &nbsp;What does that mean? &nbsp;Consider in the water example, a certain number of rain drops will produce a certain change in volume of the amount of water in the bucket. &nbsp; This relationship holds up to the point where the bucket overflows and the incoming rain drops cannot be measured because all of the space has been taken up. &nbsp;The same is true for pixels in the CCD sensor: &nbsp;There is a linear response between the amount of incoming photons and the measured number of electrons per pixel up to a certain point where the relationship breaks down and the pixel "overflows" or "blooms" (see Figure 2 below).

<center>![bloom.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmdniwGm8vPapn8wnWvRSRHCSWwmUJBTLkhtyNocHB2vfE/bloom.png)</center>
<center>*Figure 2. Example of blooming. Credit: [AOweb](http://astronomyonline.org/astrophotography/ccd.asp)*</center>

Some types of CCD sensors have what is called an Anti-Blooming Gate (ABG) to try to minimize the effects of blooming. &nbsp;However, since photometry is concerned with precise counting of the number of photons, it is better, but not absolutely necessary, to have a Non Anti Blooming Gate (NABG) to get an unadulterated measurement. &nbsp;The manufacturer's CCD specifications will include the Full Well Depth of the sensor, or the <i>expected</i>&nbsp;number of electrons that can be collected before the pixels bloom. &nbsp;In either case (ABG or NABG), it is best practice to actually test the camera to find out where the pixels saturate and if there is any non-linear behavior before the point of saturation. &nbsp;This will enable better photometry since the "overflow" point is well established and can be avoided.

<center>![linearity.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNXskNYFxWmRPAZwGDrUHRWUvsgcpTECkSU2N22tu3iyB/linearity.png)</center>
<center>*Figure 3. Results of linearity testing. The sensor displays linear behavior for roughly a minute before saturating. Credit: Author*</center>

The sensor clearly saturates at just over 60,000 ADU (Analog to digital units). &nbsp;However, after fitting a straight line to the data, there also appears to be some non-linear behavior before the point of saturation. &nbsp;It is not entirely clear from this data exactly where the linearity ends, but a reasonable estimate is about 50,000 ADU. &nbsp;This is a "deeper" full well depth than reported by the CCD manufacturer (SBIG). &nbsp;However, it is probably best that their estimate is conservative. &nbsp;In fact, it is smart to use the more conservative number to calculate exposure times for the targets of interest. &nbsp;For example, if the goal was to expose a target until it reaches half of its full well depth (a typical practice in photometry), it would be wise to use 40,000/2 = 20,000 ADU. &nbsp;When in the business of counting photons, it is always safer to err on the side of under-exposure in order to maintain the all important linear relationship between the incoming light and measured electrons.

**References**
1. AOweb: &nbsp;<a href="http://astronomyonline.org/astrophotography/ccd.asp">http://astronomyonline.org/astrophotography/ccd.asp</a>
2. Howell, S. B. 2006, Handbook of CCD Astronomy, Cambridge University Press, UK
👍  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and 323 others
properties (23)
authorptsouth97
permlinklinearity-testing
categorysteemstem
json_metadata{"tags":["steemstem","astronomy","space","science","astrophotography"],"image":["https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmU2AWJkPEcsSEsTMSzCMkPv6Asd6XHQqTU8Zo4WQRawRh/ccd.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmdniwGm8vPapn8wnWvRSRHCSWwmUJBTLkhtyNocHB2vfE/bloom.png","https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNXskNYFxWmRPAZwGDrUHRWUvsgcpTECkSU2N22tu3iyB/linearity.png"],"links":["http://astronomyonline.org/astrophotography/ccd.asp"],"app":"steemit/0.1","format":"markdown"}
created2019-02-24 12:03:06
last_update2019-02-24 12:03:06
depth0
children2
last_payout2019-03-03 12:03:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value2.114 HBD
curator_payout_value0.614 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length3,800
author_reputation3,210,574,339,316
root_title"Linearity testing"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id80,323,550
net_rshares4,578,511,030,556
author_curate_reward""
vote details (387)
@alexs1320 ·
$0.02
It's tricky for all kinds of equipment... For my colleagues (biology), always check the specs of your camera system if you want to do some sort of quantification. This is the reason why.
👍  ,
properties (23)
authoralexs1320
permlinkre-ptsouth97-linearity-testing-20190224t215006025z
categorysteemstem
json_metadata{"tags":["steemstem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2019-02-24 21:50:09
last_update2019-02-24 21:50:09
depth1
children0
last_payout2019-03-03 21:50:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.015 HBD
curator_payout_value0.004 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length186
author_reputation150,945,165,388,638
root_title"Linearity testing"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd0
post_id80,344,118
net_rshares33,664,553,370
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@steemstem ·
$0.49
re-ptsouth97-linearity-testing-20190227t022850998z
<div class='text-justify'> <div class='pull-left'> <br /> <center> <img width='125' src='https://i.postimg.cc/9FwhnG3w/steemstem_curie.png'> </center>  <br/> </div> <br /> <br /> 

 This post has been voted on by the **SteemSTEM** curation team and voting trail in collaboration with **@curie**. <br /> 
 If you appreciate the work we are doing then consider [voting](https://www.steemit.com/~witnesses) both projects for witness by selecting [**stem.witness**](https://steemconnect.com/sign/account_witness_vote?approve=1&witness=stem.witness) and [**curie**](https://steemconnect.com/sign/account_witness_vote?approve=1&witness=curie)! <br /> 
For additional information please join us on the [**SteemSTEM discord**]( https://discord.gg/BPARaqn) and to get to know the rest of the community! </div>
👍  , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorsteemstem
permlinkre-ptsouth97-linearity-testing-20190227t022850998z
categorysteemstem
json_metadata{"app":"bloguable-bot"}
created2019-02-27 02:28:54
last_update2019-02-27 02:28:54
depth1
children0
last_payout2019-03-06 02:28:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.367 HBD
curator_payout_value0.121 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length800
author_reputation262,017,435,115,313
root_title"Linearity testing"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id80,469,208
net_rshares817,235,890,671
author_curate_reward""
vote details (6)