create account

Disappointed in the APPICS Whitepaper. by robert-call

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com
· @robert-call · (edited)
$21.71
Disappointed in the APPICS Whitepaper.
![appics.PNG](https://steemitimages.com/DQmWLsb5ZZfQzsm9p3rvGezLbiUV7qMamMfaWMvH8SiRrzf/appics.PNG)

http://www.appics.com/downloads/Appics_Whitepaper.pdf

A few disappointments.

1. 65/25 Author/Curators Split. Just money running out the door. I foresee _"Influencer's"_ just dumping this poor token into oblivion. 50/50 is the way to go. _"If we do it together, we split it."_

2. No incentive for Token Investors continued support of the price.

__Other Issues. Please correct me if I'm wrong. I could of overlooked the items noted below.__

1. No information on the vesting parameters for the APPICS Token. Inflation Rate?

2. What about the APPICS airdrop for STEEM Power holders?

3. Reward / Curation Curve?

5. Total Annual inflation for the XAP tokens?

5. Automated Market Maker?

6. Will the platform support STEEM and other SMT tokens?

I'm a bit surprised by the lack of hard info about this ICO.
πŸ‘  , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorrobert-call
permlinkdisappointed-in-the-appics-whitepaper
categoryappics
json_metadata{"tags":["appics"],"image":["https://steemitimages.com/DQmWLsb5ZZfQzsm9p3rvGezLbiUV7qMamMfaWMvH8SiRrzf/appics.PNG"],"links":["http://www.appics.com/downloads/Appics_Whitepaper.pdf"],"app":"steemit/0.1","format":"markdown"}
created2017-12-19 03:42:51
last_update2017-12-19 03:44:27
depth0
children10
last_payout2017-12-26 03:42:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value18.396 HBD
curator_payout_value3.310 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length909
author_reputation3,868,645,717,738
root_title"Disappointed in the APPICS Whitepaper."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd0
post_id24,121,154
net_rshares3,468,797,696,101
author_curate_reward""
vote details (8)
@blazing ·
$0.32
i heard that the price is too high to participate in pre token sale
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorblazing
permlinkre-robert-call-disappointed-in-the-appics-whitepaper-20171219t151654945z
categoryappics
json_metadata{"tags":["appics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-12-19 15:16:57
last_update2017-12-19 15:16:57
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-12-26 15:16:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.241 HBD
curator_payout_value0.077 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length67
author_reputation117,662,220,860,076
root_title"Disappointed in the APPICS Whitepaper."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id24,201,044
net_rshares50,567,014,703
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@brothermic ·
$3.67
hmm, seems a poor whitepaper :(
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorbrothermic
permlinkre-robert-call-disappointed-in-the-appics-whitepaper-20171220t000327486z
categoryappics
json_metadata{"tags":["appics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-12-20 00:03:24
last_update2017-12-20 00:03:24
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-12-27 00:03:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value2.754 HBD
curator_payout_value0.918 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length31
author_reputation70,127,808,776,053
root_title"Disappointed in the APPICS Whitepaper."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id24,266,383
net_rshares584,033,402,868
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@darkerhorse ·
$0.73
seems like a haphazard project to me.i think they should have spent more time working on the modalities of the token instead of hurrying to launch an ico on the ethereum platform then later following up on smt.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authordarkerhorse
permlinkre-robert-call-disappointed-in-the-appics-whitepaper-20171219t035458784z
categoryappics
json_metadata{"tags":["appics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-12-19 03:54:57
last_update2017-12-19 03:54:57
depth1
children1
last_payout2017-12-26 03:54:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.683 HBD
curator_payout_value0.047 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length210
author_reputation1,376,329,664,978
root_title"Disappointed in the APPICS Whitepaper."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id24,122,479
net_rshares117,084,859,092
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@robert-call ·
It does seems rushed. With Ned as the advisor I was really expecting more. I cringe at the thought of dealing with an ERC-20 token. Especially with Ethereum's Crypto Kitties Congestion at the moment.
properties (22)
authorrobert-call
permlinkre-darkerhorse-re-robert-call-disappointed-in-the-appics-whitepaper-20171219t040314427z
categoryappics
json_metadata{"tags":["appics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-12-19 04:03:15
last_update2017-12-19 04:03:15
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-12-26 04:03:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length199
author_reputation3,868,645,717,738
root_title"Disappointed in the APPICS Whitepaper."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id24,123,376
net_rshares0
@douglasjames ·
I am the founder of Current X Change, and I would love to hear what you think about our whitepaper! currentxchange.com and directly to the whitepaper is bit.ly/PRPpaper . Our platform has been designed and redesigned to be the best gift we can give to the planet.
properties (22)
authordouglasjames
permlinkre-robert-call-disappointed-in-the-appics-whitepaper-20180919t221831211z
categoryappics
json_metadata{"tags":["appics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-09-19 22:18:39
last_update2018-09-19 22:18:39
depth1
children0
last_payout2018-09-26 22:18:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length263
author_reputation1,601,433,643,356
root_title"Disappointed in the APPICS Whitepaper."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id71,711,310
net_rshares0
@faisal79 ·
Fabulous one!!!
 I like your post
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorfaisal79
permlinkre-robert-call-disappointed-in-the-appics-whitepaper-20171220t091200936z
categoryappics
json_metadata{"tags":["appics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-12-20 09:12:09
last_update2017-12-20 09:12:09
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-12-27 09:12:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length33
author_reputation1,364,151,823,900
root_title"Disappointed in the APPICS Whitepaper."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id24,321,199
net_rshares81,481,839
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@nomadics ·
$1.61
HI Robert,
is it 65/25 and 10 for something else or it was a typo?
Maybe they did not decide yet about the Reward / Curation Curve...
Regards, Tim
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authornomadics
permlinkre-robert-call-disappointed-in-the-appics-whitepaper-20171219t083317571z
categoryappics
json_metadata{"tags":["appics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-12-19 08:33:18
last_update2017-12-19 08:33:18
depth1
children2
last_payout2017-12-26 08:33:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value1.273 HBD
curator_payout_value0.333 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length146
author_reputation17,055,968,675,476
root_title"Disappointed in the APPICS Whitepaper."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id24,152,336
net_rshares254,340,070,997
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@robert-call ·
The other 10%  to APPICS themselves. I could understand if this was the initial announcement, but when they are expected to take hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars over the next few weeks I expect more details to be available.
properties (22)
authorrobert-call
permlinkre-nomadics-re-robert-call-disappointed-in-the-appics-whitepaper-20171219t085618550z
categoryappics
json_metadata{"tags":["appics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-12-19 08:56:18
last_update2017-12-19 08:56:18
depth2
children1
last_payout2017-12-26 08:56:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length236
author_reputation3,868,645,717,738
root_title"Disappointed in the APPICS Whitepaper."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id24,154,755
net_rshares0
@nomadics · (edited)
$1.16
Some time ago I checked several users in steemit. I needed info about the profitability of the curation in steemit. 
1.	So In my case (under 1000 SP) If you are active user, the curation reward is less than 1% of the total income of your account.
2.	Typical user with 10 000 SP has curation reward about 2% of the total income of his acc.
3.	β€œTypical”  :) user with 100 000 SP has curation reward under 5% of the total income.
This is for users that are authors and curators in the same time.

My point is that there is no big value to be only curator in steemit, because you miss 95% oportunity. If Appics make the same 25% for curation they will get the same result :)

If they expect millions of dollars investment it must be 1% not 10% for themself. Just my opinion.
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authornomadics
permlinkre-robert-call-re-nomadics-re-robert-call-disappointed-in-the-appics-whitepaper-20171219t090830932z
categoryappics
json_metadata{"tags":["appics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-12-19 09:08:30
last_update2017-12-19 09:11:51
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-12-26 09:08:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value1.004 HBD
curator_payout_value0.154 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length770
author_reputation17,055,968,675,476
root_title"Disappointed in the APPICS Whitepaper."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id24,156,052
net_rshares183,147,076,659
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@praful ·
Yeah i am also disappointed to it
properties (22)
authorpraful
permlinkre-robert-call-disappointed-in-the-appics-whitepaper-20171219t195822863z
categoryappics
json_metadata{"tags":["appics"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-12-19 19:58:18
last_update2017-12-19 19:58:18
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-12-26 19:58:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length33
author_reputation2,793,255,558,307
root_title"Disappointed in the APPICS Whitepaper."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id24,240,138
net_rshares0