<div class="text-justify">


![image.png](https://images.hive.blog/DQmPETzYG3hrabc284q2fnkAKkniSo2Ki3npWBFUNSjgyKs/image.png)
[Image source](https://pixabay.com/es/photos/gente-red-3139194/)

It is necessary to start from the idea that knowledge is the result of being able to understand with the capacity to intuit any real event, since knowledge without known reality would have no place in a society lacking real life solutions. 

The reality of our society involves a series of factors that will not change until we can change as a whole, we are what we are, and it depends on us to continue being or not. Everything we know is momentary, since we are subject to change, and within a philosophy where there is diversity between doubts, certainties and opinions, then we will be debating within a provisional world and that we all depend on a moment that depends on the circumstances we are living. 

What is really valid is to be able to consign importance to a life within a society that inspires shared knowledge, so it is necessary to distinguish an intellectual knowledge and the benefits it provides under a real contrast in which there is an understanding that derives from the knowledge of the senses that is still important for a society that demands facts and real solutions. 

In conclusion I can add that more than a problem, it is necessary an approach that manages to cover the answers of a confusion that transcends between opinions and certainties which brings us to great conflicts within a society in need of peace, so that knowledge must evolve towards facts that govern intolerance and allow all opinions and that certainty is simply a strengthening entity for general knowledge.   

</div>