Why not doing it the right way, by making the Rshare follow the exact league minimum power, Silver 3, Silver 2, Silver 1 shouldn't be all the same, And include Summoners too, that's the way the game should be played, Bots spamming matches with 1Bcx cards need to up their game or stop

Really good proposal, when I played for a moment in silver or gold league there was a plenty of accounts using only 1 lvl cards and that drains pool, so people complain about low sps rewards, this new formula looks really cool, anyway in champ or even in diamond I will see no difference, cuz there so much competition, but for players in lower leagues, which are not bots and playing around rental market well - that change gonna be huge!

Guess im maxing the remaining ones lucky not many

I have maxed cards so if that serves me better couont my vote lol.  I dont play with the low level cards for some reason i like maxing it and my bank account is yelling at me for buying all these gold and old cards and a 10K pack chaos buy for my project with the many guilds so i have enough cards to fill them.

Im all for this I bot but have high level bots so wont do antthing to me just give me more 

I think it will help ppl incentivise getting more cards and not pushish maxed decks with price decreases as they level like me.  Was initially against it but swapped my vot of 500K sps to support it as it will end up with higher battle rewards for me and a incentive to get the f out of bronze farming or something I farm with a bot at over a million CP so thats not a issue its like playing a real person and i have alot of cards on it so i let it earn 24/7 sucking in rewards to fund my other projects here and pay me to.  If im in diamaond or champ it sounds like i can make more loot so why not

Rift watchers should shoot up if this happens there is so little supply

hmm, i dont think the max level playable in a given league should be the requirement to earn max rewards. maybe 1 level below or something. not really fair to limit diamond earnings if playing with lvl 9 commons, lvl 7 rares, and lvl 5 epics since those last levels cost almost the same as all the levels leading up to it. I like the general idea though, just maybe tweak the details a bit like I suggested (or some other tweak).

I totally read this wrong, the level limits are lower for rewards than they are for lvl requirements per league. I LOVE THIS!

I fail to see how this benefits lower level players or makes the game attractive to new players in any way, shape, or form. 

This is the worst proposal that I've seen so far.
SPL teams keeps "acknowledging" that they need to focus on attracting new players and keep them but all the decisions that are being made are going towards the opposite.
Keep them coming that way and this game will be dead even before the next expansion.
Most of rewards are already going to old players and every update keeps amplifying that.
Can't believe that this option is even considered.

This could encourage people to level up their cards but I think ultimately nobody will care that much and the bots will just rent the gap cards they need and that'll be that. Maybe get rid of the starter cards altogether? Or new accounts can use them for 1 season and that's it.

I think it's crap. For example, I use extra sandworm level 1 with slug rule. I think tactical finesse and skill should not be punished. if i am so good that i beat diamond players with my silver deck, i should be rewarded if anything and not punished! let people live the freedom and skill as they want!

i personally won't have any disadvantage from this change. but as a passionate gamer, i don't like the idea of penalizing skills just because you don't want to ban bots. somewhere it's an incentive to climb up despite worse cards and defeat people with better decks

it's hard enough for play to earn games to keep the balance between fair play and pay to win. to destroy it so wantonly is really grandiose!

just ban bots, that would save us a lot!

![untitled.gif](https://media.tenor.com/NWD8f6k-9n8AAAAC/assi-toni.gif)

even though the change would probably have an advantage for me reward-wise. i don't like the basic idea, limiting skill/freedom is a nogo for a game in my opinion. maybe i'm looking at it wrong. but i think the game is more successful when it's primarily a game and you can earn from it. but i have the feeling that the priority changes and it becomes primarily an investment where you can play a bit on the side. i don't believe this is a success model to follow!

How about we make proposals that will encourage new players, not make it harder for new players?

I understand how this could be thought as an improvement, I would probably get a lot more share rewards but I think this will completely demotivate new players.
The rich get richer and the poor get poorer, do we not want new players coming in?
Just ban bots already or implement new player rewards instead of just pushing these kind of changes that might just hurt more in the long term.

I like the assertiveness this formula (as an example) shows toward paying upwards to players that have more cards or more skin in the game based off their lineups at each given level.  This could be something worthwhile for sure.

The way I see it when land gets here the bots are not going to be able to keep up anyway. Really hate seeing my chicken nerfed though. Wen land :)

Boooo! This is another push to give yet more rewards to those with the most money. Higher level cards already get extra rewards just from the fact that it's easier to win when your cards are maxed out. You're penalizing players who can't afford to max out their decks, and also penalizing those who are able to rise up the ranks despite not having a maxed out deck.

@scrubs24 made a nice suggestion. It should work both ways. Give a bonus if you have max lvl cards for the league.