create account

Final Review of Steem Economic Changes by steemitblog

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com
· @steemitblog · (edited)
$112.67
Final Review of Steem Economic Changes
Today we are summarizing the changes we have implemented and are prepared to release on Tuesday and hardfork the following Tuesday.  If there are any issues discovered this could be postponed.  Change is always controversial, but we feel the changes we have implemented reflect the wishes of the wider community.

### Changes:
1. Power Down in 13 weeks instead of 104
2. Inflate at 9.5% APR narrowing to 0.95% APR by 0.01% every 250,000 blocks (Roughly 0.5% per year).
3. Steem Dollar conversion takes 3.5 days (down from 7)
4. Witnesses receive 10% of inflation, runner up witnesses get paid 5 times the top 19 per block produced.
5. Miners get paid the same as the top 19 per block produced
6. Witnesses / Miners will continue to be paid in Steem Power 
7. 75% of inflation goes to authors and curators 
8. 15% of inflation is allocated to Steem Power
9. Switch to Equihash Proof of Work algorithm.
10. Remove rewards for including Proof of Work transactions


## Equihash Proof of Work 


By changing to Equihash we hope to make ordinary computers more competitive relative to high end GPUs with optimized algorithms.  Over the past couple of months one or two people have dominated the Steem mining queue.  They have either identified a computational shortcut or implemented a private GPU algorithm. The Equihash algorithm was adopted by the creators of Zcash, a recently hyped privacy-oriented crypto-currency.  This algorithm is designed to make heavy use of randomly accessed memory.  The computations are very simple, but they require 128 MB of ram accessed in a manner that should saturate the memory bus.   


The nature of this Proof of Work algorithm is that solving a single instance can take over 2 blocks (validating is instant).  We have updated the Proof of Work to allow them to build on top of any block after the last irreversible block.  In practice this means miners have about 30 seconds to solve the Proof of Work.  


## Steem Dollar Conversion 


The moving average of STEEM / DOLLAR price has changed to 3.5 days to match the conversion delay.  This should dramatically reduce the price volatility risk of converting Steem Dollars to STEEM which in turn should strengthen the peg.  3.5 day median should still give 1.75 days to detect and correct any bogus price feeds before they can have a negative impact on the protocol.  


## Paying Witnesses in Steem Power


Witnesses have always been paid in Steem Power. In our last post on proposed changes, we suggested paying them in STEEM.  After talking with prominent witnesses, we decided to keep it in Steem Power.  The 3 month power down significantly improves witness liquidity and paying as Steem Power will prevent the need to manually power-up after every block as we believe most Witnesses will/should choose to do.


## Paying Runner Up Witnesses (Time Shared Witness Slot)


We have increased the amount paid per block to the runner up witnesses. These witnesses produce blocks a couple of times per hour instead of every single minute. Even though they get paid 5 times the other witnesses for their block, on average they will still earn less per day than the top 19.  By increasing the pay-per-block we enable more people to be runner up witnesses which helps keep a healthy supply of standby witnesses. 


## Miner Pay


Miners will make the same per block as the top 19 witnesses.  After watching the miner queue be dominated by one or two individuals, some people were rightly concerned that a mining monopoly could consume a disproportionate amount of the block rewards. By paying the miners (collectively) the same as the top 19 witnesses, we are assured that even if mining is fully dominated by a single individual that said individual would have no more power or income than the top 19.  After factoring in the cost of mining, their profits would be less than the elected witnesses.


## Modeling Difference in Steem Supply

<center>
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/347290/20433961/d0c5d2ec-ad73-11e6-9a7d-6da2f513fdab.png
</center>


The above chart shows the difference between the old and new model by comparing the current Liquid Steem vs the new Total Steem ( Liquid and Vesting).  What this shows us is that within 18 months there will be a net reduction in supply.  This assumes the worst-case that everyone but Steemit powers down at the maximum rate.  

<center>
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/347290/20435528/6cba726a-ad7a-11e6-8f87-e449f25091a8.png
</center>
We would like to caution speculators that these charts do not tell the whole story when it comes to projecting future price.  Supply is only one side of the equation and there is no easy way to measure how the market currently perceives Steem held as Steem Power relative to the liquid STEEM.   The other side of the equation is demand. Small changes in demand can have dramatic impact on price.  There are too many variables to make any projection on where the price will move in the short term. 

## Witness Pay

One of the great services that our witnesses have been providing our community is the funding of development from their witness pay. The Witness role was not intended for this at genesis, however, it seems the delegated project funding has been very valuable, and these witnesses should be appreciated for their hard work and dedication. While the budget for witness pay, less the POW inclusion reward (.55% inflation currently), is increasing from 0.75% to 0.95% inflation.  Effectively, witness pay decreases in the short run and increases in the long run. 

## Long View


These changes are intended to open doors for Steem as a currency and provide greater synergy between the currency, social and content aspects of the network. We look forward to comments. We will consider comments before setting a date for offering the potential upgrade to the network’s witnesses.
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and 551 others
πŸ‘Ž  
properties (23)
authorsteemitblog
permlinkfinal-review-of-steem-economic-changes
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem","steemit"],"image":["https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/347290/20433961/d0c5d2ec-ad73-11e6-9a7d-6da2f513fdab.png","https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/347290/20435528/6cba726a-ad7a-11e6-8f87-e449f25091a8.png"],"app":"steemit/0.1","format":"markdown"}
created2016-11-18 14:54:00
last_update2016-11-18 15:37:57
depth0
children133
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value110.298 HBD
curator_payout_value2.374 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length5,878
author_reputation332,472,558,821,177
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,407
net_rshares141,848,875,205,466
author_curate_reward""
vote details (616)
@andre-ager ·
I am totally on board with these changes. I know some concern on the initial impact of the 3 month power down has been expressed but from my view this will also encourage people to power up since there will be less risk in the long term tying up of  your Steem. Love the STEEM Community!
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorandre-ager
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t163628119z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 16:36:27
last_update2016-11-18 16:36:27
depth1
children1
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length287
author_reputation9,189,464,432,315
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,796,099
net_rshares346,830,520,495
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@taoteh1221 ·
Agreed.
properties (22)
authortaoteh1221
permlinkre-andre-ager-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t184745500z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 18:47:42
last_update2016-11-18 18:47:42
depth2
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length7
author_reputation12,021,365,969,253
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,796,963
net_rshares0
@anonymint ·
@dan, @ned I strongly urge you to do the change for the inflation but to [not lower the power down from 104 to 13 weeks](https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1558366.msg16939032#msg16939032). Otherwise I think you will have a blood bath on your hands. Okay you whales want to dump and then buy back cheap. Thanks for not protecting the value of my STEEM POWER!
properties (22)
authoranonymint
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161121t004643902z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"users":["dan","ned"],"links":["https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1558366.msg16939032#msg16939032"]}
created2016-11-21 00:46:39
last_update2016-11-21 00:46:39
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length363
author_reputation28,085,935,540,836
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,811,674
net_rshares0
@anyx ·
$0.09
Thank you for listening to community and witness feedback! I am happy to see that the miner reward will not be increased, which was my largest concern. 

I am overall happy with the changes, despite witness project funding which might need to be re-evaluated. I would hate to discontinue projects @cheetah and @steemcleaners due to lack of funding.
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , , ,
πŸ‘Ž  ,
properties (23)
authoranyx
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t170042400z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"users":["cheetah","steemcleaners"]}
created2016-11-18 17:00:45
last_update2016-11-18 17:00:45
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.079 HBD
curator_payout_value0.007 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length348
author_reputation98,676,136,100,181
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,796,265
net_rshares2,370,142,583,041
author_curate_reward""
vote details (14)
@arcaneinfo · (edited)
It may just be me but I wish they would be more open to the community and address/inform us to the real reason all these changes our taking place. How can something start so strong begin to down swing so drastically and now need massive changes just to stay a float? If people "aka" the developers would be 100% honest with everything and share the true agenda it would be less confusion on the state of position with this platform.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorarcaneinfo
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t155513816z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 15:55:15
last_update2016-11-18 15:55:51
depth1
children5
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length432
author_reputation14,902,978,467,172
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,789
net_rshares6,650,374,569
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@richardcrill ·
Have you not been following the the steemitblog? I was feeling the same way until a few weeks ago when they started telling us all the plans. It seems to me that they are being pretty transparent and that is pretty damn cool! They proposed some changes and listened to everyones input and now are moving forward. Whats not to like? IMO the price spike is a natural thing to happen when speculators get carried away. I confident the price will begin to trend upwards soon. In part because of these changes.
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authorrichardcrill
permlinkre-arcaneinfo-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t172824371z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 17:28:24
last_update2016-11-18 17:28:24
depth2
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length505
author_reputation55,974,657,421,087
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,796,427
net_rshares10,716,132,643
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@taoteh1221 · (edited)
The super high interest rate on steem power was the big issue (for example 279% at one point back in july and slowly dropping daily), causing more sell pressure than buy pressure (happens to every super high interest coin like HYP, HYPER, etc etc. I've been warning about this since july). The changes address this issue very well, with a 1.425% APR on steem power for starters, decreasing every year by roughly 0.075% until it hits a minimum of 0.075% and stays there. No more high interest inflation issues means LONG TERM people will get back to normal speculation and demand / value will fluctuate only based on normal factors (perceived value based on features / platform feasibility / dev team performance / etc etc). SHORT TERM, it MAY (just a guess) be a bumpy ride as people who were locked in a 2 year exit window have the option of a 3 month exit window...we'll see soon enough.
properties (22)
authortaoteh1221
permlinkre-arcaneinfo-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t184204870z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 18:42:03
last_update2016-11-19 14:37:33
depth2
children1
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length889
author_reputation12,021,365,969,253
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,796,932
net_rshares0
@matrixdweller · (edited)
I know I am not powering down or selling at this price. In my view Steem should be near 30$ a coin right now.
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
authormatrixdweller
permlinkre-taoteh1221-re-arcaneinfo-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161119t124036318z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-19 12:40:30
last_update2016-11-19 12:40:42
depth3
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length109
author_reputation-29,653,420,748,873
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,801,439
net_rshares225,513,351,282
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@timcliff ·
$0.03
I think they were pretty open with their reasoning in their original blog post, and have been very responsive to the community's questions and concerns.
https://steemit.com/steem/@steemitblog/proposed-changes-to-steem-economy

If you are in the mindset that all of this is an evil conspiracy and nothing they say is going to satisfy you unless they confess to their 'evil plot', then I'm afraid you will probably never be satisfied.
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
authortimcliff
permlinkre-arcaneinfo-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t173200502z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steem/@steemitblog/proposed-changes-to-steem-economy"]}
created2016-11-18 17:32:00
last_update2016-11-18 17:32:00
depth2
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.031 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length432
author_reputation272,954,445,077,789
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,796,455
net_rshares866,751,829,877
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@tuck-fheman ·
<blockquote>How can something start so strong begin to down swing so drastically</blockquote>

Because cryptocurrency. ;)
properties (22)
authortuck-fheman
permlinkre-arcaneinfo-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161206t010309708z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-12-06 01:03:12
last_update2016-12-06 01:03:12
depth2
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length121
author_reputation345,778,813,561,569
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,928,032
net_rshares0
@azmi ·
Thank you sir, good luck propagating platform adoption (upgrades / promotion) without too much need for heavy cashout sessions in the future.
properties (22)
authorazmi
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161119t094445310z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-19 09:44:54
last_update2016-11-19 09:44:54
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length141
author_reputation14,882,342,790
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,800,862
net_rshares0
@bitcoin1488 ·
How does inflation help #cryptocurrency?
properties (22)
authorbitcoin1488
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20170727t070258852z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["cryptocurrency","steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-07-27 07:03:00
last_update2017-07-27 07:03:00
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-08-03 07:03:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length40
author_reputation-1,036,342,845,975
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id9,880,637
net_rshares0
@blocktrades · (edited)
$1.54
I support these changes and I'm very glad to see the developers responded to input from the witnesses and others regarding these changes. I believe that the changes made from the original proposal are all beneficial: 1) reducing inflation over time to reduce the impact on SP/VESTS holders, 2) paying witness and mining rewards in SP instead of Steem, and 3) eliminating the proposed increase in rewards for miners. I also support the unchanged move to a Equihash as a fairer mining algorithm. I've also long been a proponent of reducing the conversion time from SBD to a 3 day interval to increase the confidence of holders, so I'm happy to see this is still in the proposal.
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and 4 others
properties (23)
authorblocktrades
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t160713641z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 16:07:12
last_update2016-11-18 16:08:36
depth1
children2
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value1.349 HBD
curator_payout_value0.192 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length676
author_reputation1,294,229,699,314,312
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,863
net_rshares14,424,742,866,289
author_curate_reward""
vote details (68)
@jacobcards ·
Blocktrades... I remember the day you upvoted me...What a marvelous day that was :)
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorjacobcards
permlinkre-blocktrades-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t201159632z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 20:12:00
last_update2016-11-18 20:12:00
depth2
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length83
author_reputation48,954,175,480,649
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,797,518
net_rshares7,167,986,343
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@jacobcards ·
I love you.. Like a brother :)
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorjacobcards
permlinkre-blocktrades-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t201237104z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 20:12:36
last_update2016-11-18 20:12:36
depth2
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length30
author_reputation48,954,175,480,649
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,797,524
net_rshares7,167,986,343
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@blocktrades · (edited)
$0.48
As stated previously, I'm fully in favor of these changes, but I suggest we give some time before the hardfork, for example at least one month. These are pretty major changes to the economics of the platform, so I think we need to make sure that these changes are well published on the standard cryptocurrency new sites prior to the change, and allow everyone (current holders and potential investors) an opportunity to evaluate the changes and make their investment decisions accordingly.  And just as a matter of publicity, I think we should show that changes are made at a steady, measured pace except in the case of bug fixes for critical problems.

This would also give time for these changes to be fully tested on a public testnet prior to changing it on the live chain, which I think is an important first step due to the economic significance of these changes.
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorblocktrades
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t170319393z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 17:03:18
last_update2016-11-18 17:05:33
depth1
children15
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.480 HBD
curator_payout_value0.004 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length868
author_reputation1,294,229,699,314,312
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,796,276
net_rshares7,680,906,752,647
author_curate_reward""
vote details (36)
@timcliff ·
@blocktrades - I highly respect your opinion, although IMO - rolling the changes out as soon as possible (while still allowing sufficient time for community review) is the best option.

I think that to a large extent, the crypto community has known these changes have been coming for a while now, and most investors have already begun making adjustments since the changes were originally proposed.

The big thing though is that markets do not like uncertainty, and I think the looming cloud of the unknown effects of the change is holding back a lot of potential investors. Personally, I am not powering up much until after the changes are rolled out. I'm waiting to see what happens. I suspect a lot of other potential investors are waiting to see what happens before they make any big moves.
properties (22)
authortimcliff
permlinkre-blocktrades-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t172228991z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"users":["blocktrades"]}
created2016-11-18 17:22:30
last_update2016-11-18 17:22:30
depth2
children14
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length793
author_reputation272,954,445,077,789
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,796,384
net_rshares0
@blocktrades · (edited)
Hi @timcliff, it's true that at least the steemit community itself has been aware of upcoming changes, and I suppose to at least some extent it's true of the wider crypto community, but the specifics of the change have only just been published today, and IMO the exact nature of the changes is important, not just the fact that there will be changes. For me at least, the change in long term inflation on VESTS was a critical issue and the resolution to that issue was just announced. I could not have even supported the changes under the original proposal that had a permanent inflation rate of ~8% on VESTS. 

I also think there's great value to be gained from publicizing these changes before making them. Announcing that something is going to happen is much more exciting than announcing a change that has already happened, IMO.

Finally, I have to disagree with you on what creates uncertainty in the mind of an investor. There is certainly some uncertainty in how the changes will play out, but I think it creates much more uncertainty in the mind of the investors if they believe that changes are made too rapidly to the blockchain, because it becomes difficult for them to anticipate the potential future value of the coin when they have no idea what is going to happen next or how soon.
πŸ‘  , , , ,
properties (23)
authorblocktrades
permlinkre-timcliff-re-blocktrades-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t182609708z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"users":["timcliff"]}
created2016-11-18 18:26:09
last_update2016-11-18 18:27:12
depth3
children12
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,295
author_reputation1,294,229,699,314,312
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,796,818
net_rshares100,276,869,100
author_curate_reward""
vote details (5)
@dantheman ·
I think we can probably reach a compromise between the two positions.
πŸ‘  , , ,
properties (23)
authordantheman
permlinkre-timcliff-re-blocktrades-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t174041042z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 17:40:39
last_update2016-11-18 17:40:39
depth3
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length69
author_reputation240,292,002,602,347
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,796,522
net_rshares19,272,389,541
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@calaber24p ·
Did we do away with changing the price reference down from 7 days ?
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorcalaber24p
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t172010042z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 17:20:09
last_update2016-11-18 17:20:09
depth1
children1
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length67
author_reputation313,033,964,963,339
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,796,374
net_rshares354,713,032,324
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@dantheman ·
Price for SBD to STEEM conversions will be 3.5 day median average of feeds produced by witnesses.
πŸ‘  , , ,
properties (23)
authordantheman
permlinkre-calaber24p-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t173342264z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 17:33:42
last_update2016-11-18 17:33:42
depth2
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length97
author_reputation240,292,002,602,347
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,796,469
net_rshares1,844,753,853
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@cebymaster · (edited)
this looks good 
<a target="_blank" href="http://itmages.ru/image/view/5206118/80ffe5aa"><img src="http://storage2.static.itmages.ru/i/16/1118/s_1479511217_7394067_80ffe5aa5b.png" /></a>
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorcebymaster
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t232035855z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"links":["http://itmages.ru/image/view/5206118/80ffe5aa"],"image":["http://storage2.static.itmages.ru/i/16/1118/s_1479511217_7394067_80ffe5aa5b.png"]}
created2016-11-18 23:20:36
last_update2016-11-18 23:21:48
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length186
author_reputation18,517,772,557,835
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,798,599
net_rshares22,405,727,653
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@charlieshrem ·
$0.80
Good Afternoon Everyone!

Charlie Shrem, currently #2 witness spot. 

We're really excited about these new changes and will install and upgrade as soon as its released. 

I'm really proud of the developers at Steemit, Inc and my fellow witnesses for the open minds and keeping an open dialog with each other and the community. 

Full STEEM ahead!

-Charlie
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorcharlieshrem
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t155042178z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 15:50:42
last_update2016-11-18 15:50:42
depth1
children1
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.727 HBD
curator_payout_value0.069 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length356
author_reputation163,581,911,573,028
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,755
net_rshares10,527,828,760,192
author_curate_reward""
vote details (63)
@taoteh1221 ·
Thanks for your hard work witness #2. Much appreciated. I'm going to have to fire up my clean machine and give you a vote. :-)
properties (22)
authortaoteh1221
permlinkre-charlieshrem-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t182004719z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 18:20:03
last_update2016-11-18 18:20:03
depth2
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length126
author_reputation12,021,365,969,253
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,796,778
net_rshares0
@cryptogee ·
I don't understand how you predict there will be less liquid Steem in a worst case where everyone powers down.

Surely there will be more?

*Cg*
properties (22)
authorcryptogee
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161203t080551157z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-12-03 08:05:57
last_update2016-12-03 08:05:57
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length144
author_reputation419,387,439,147,428
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,904,940
net_rshares0
@dantheman ·
$0.83
I would like to remind everyone that Ned and I will not be powering down during the first 3 months after the hard fork.
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and 27 others
properties (23)
authordantheman
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t150149354z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 15:01:48
last_update2016-11-18 15:01:48
depth1
children18
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.764 HBD
curator_payout_value0.063 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length119
author_reputation240,292,002,602,347
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,441
net_rshares10,865,809,381,002
author_curate_reward""
vote details (91)
@fminerten1 ·
I'am sure that you have enough on both exchanges Polo and Trex ;). How low you can go. AGS greetings.
properties (22)
authorfminerten1
permlinkre-dantheman-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t161720570z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 16:17:21
last_update2016-11-18 16:17:21
depth2
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length101
author_reputation36,412,535,193,751
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,952
net_rshares0
@furion ·
I haven't powered down yet, and will refrain to do so until STEEM succeeds.
πŸ‘  , , , ,
properties (23)
authorfurion
permlinkre-dantheman-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t160326226z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 16:03:24
last_update2016-11-18 16:03:24
depth2
children3
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length75
author_reputation116,503,940,714,958
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,842
net_rshares620,561,197,197
author_curate_reward""
vote details (5)
@demotruk ·
What's your definition of success for this purpose?
properties (22)
authordemotruk
permlinkre-furion-re-dantheman-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161119t100435637z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-19 10:04:36
last_update2016-11-19 10:04:36
depth3
children2
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length51
author_reputation279,453,298,745,864
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,800,911
net_rshares0
@majes ·
Me either Dan, me either...
πŸ‘  , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authormajes
permlinkre-dantheman-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t150757072z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 15:07:57
last_update2016-11-18 15:07:57
depth2
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length27
author_reputation132,839,043,973,673
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,467
net_rshares43,167,906,454
author_curate_reward""
vote details (8)
@meesterboom ·
I think I will avoid this too. Solidarity and all that!
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authormeesterboom
permlinkre-dantheman-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t150749184z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 15:07:51
last_update2016-11-18 15:07:51
depth2
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length55
author_reputation1,797,510,506,247,279
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,466
net_rshares18,852,804,932
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@oudekaas · (edited)
Dantheman could I ask you where I can find what the reasoning is behind changing the 2 years to 13 weeks?
I don't see how Steemit can succeed if we are just hoping on the fact that whales/ dolphins are not powering down than the system can handle in 13 weeks.

We seen in the past that  a relatively small group of whales powering down could plunge steems value, so I don't understand why the choice was made for 13 weeks?

Why don't we change the rate based on the health of the economy for instance.
At least until Steemit is fully grown. Now with the 13 weeks an unstable timebomb is created, that places all hope in the whales/ dolphins making sensible deicisions on powering down whilst right now nobody knows what the current system can handle in terms of steem flooding in.

There could be many better options than the 13 weeks and I haven't heard many solid arguments that seem to backup the 13 weeks.

I want to invest heavily in steem but this is a major breakpoint for me.
If anyone could point me in the right direction and put my nerves to ease I would be grateful!
properties (22)
authoroudekaas
permlinkre-dantheman-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20170807t211447744z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-08-07 21:14:48
last_update2017-08-07 21:16:03
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-08-14 21:14:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,078
author_reputation1,880,122,113,707
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id11,102,034
net_rshares0
@stealthtrader ·
What % of inflation goes to authors and curators now?

> 75% of inflation goes to authors and curators
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorstealthtrader
permlinkre-dantheman-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t163959414z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 16:40:00
last_update2016-11-18 16:40:00
depth2
children4
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length102
author_reputation74,266,337,461,760
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,796,127
net_rshares23,675,305,109
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@smooth ·
It is comparatively tiny, around 6.5%. However, the economic models are so different that is not really comparable.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorsmooth
permlinkre-stealthtrader-re-dantheman-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161119t004600900z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-19 00:46:00
last_update2016-11-19 00:46:00
depth3
children3
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length115
author_reputation260,342,945,372,716
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,799,075
net_rshares22,579,831,140
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@steempowerwhale ·
There is a new feature, you can now add a profile picture :-)
properties (22)
authorsteempowerwhale
permlinkre-dantheman-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t154129603z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 15:41:33
last_update2016-11-18 15:41:33
depth2
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length61
author_reputation6,727,613,422,973
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,695
net_rshares0
@steevc ·
I can loan you a few Steem if you need it ;)
πŸ‘  , , , ,
properties (23)
authorsteevc
permlinkre-dantheman-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t150449178z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 15:03:30
last_update2016-11-18 15:03:30
depth2
children2
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length44
author_reputation1,396,836,247,219,334
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,447
net_rshares34,459,683,385
author_curate_reward""
vote details (5)
@anduweb ·
Don't be mean@steevc :),  @dantheman @ned, good example to follow.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authoranduweb
permlinkre-steevc-re-dantheman-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t150639530z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"users":["dantheman","ned"]}
created2016-11-18 15:06:39
last_update2016-11-18 15:06:39
depth3
children1
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length66
author_reputation11,311,191,021,706
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,461
net_rshares4,908,063,834
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@taoteh1221 ·
Thank you sir, good luck propagating platform adoption (upgrades / promotion) without too much need for heavy cashout sessions in the future.
properties (22)
authortaoteh1221
permlinkre-dantheman-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t181726150z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 18:17:24
last_update2016-11-18 18:17:24
depth2
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length141
author_reputation12,021,365,969,253
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,796,760
net_rshares0
@demotruk ·
Now that the long term commitment token is a mid term commitment token, will you consider creating a new token for rewarding long term financial commitment? It could have a less than linear benefit vs. Steem Power, modeled on the idea of long and short term treasury bonds.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authordemotruk
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t153954866z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 15:39:57
last_update2016-11-18 15:39:57
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length273
author_reputation279,453,298,745,864
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,683
net_rshares53,394,606,785
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@donchate ·
An open-source equihash cpu and gpu miner to coincide with this release would be splendid.
properties (22)
authordonchate
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161119t003729989z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-19 00:37:45
last_update2016-11-19 00:37:45
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length90
author_reputation956,784,034,700
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,799,040
net_rshares0
@dragosroua · (edited)
Thanks for the update, appreciated. I agree to the implementation of the changes as suggested in the blogpost (i.e. RC next Tuesday and official implementation the Tuesday after that). My reasons are purely contextual and are based on the big end of the year spending bubble. December is a high liquidity month and, strategically, it would be a good time to throw money on the market, because it will be rapidly absorbed, one way or another. One question: I'm a wannabee witness (not yet in the first 50, currently at 52): we'll get a hold of the RC next Tuesday or earlier?

Thank you.
πŸ‘  , , ,
properties (23)
authordragosroua
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t150427612z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 15:04:27
last_update2016-11-18 15:05:03
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length586
author_reputation372,798,229,806,288
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,452
net_rshares34,383,760,620
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@elumni ·
when is the date that the inflation rate goes down? Is it Nov 29 2016?
properties (22)
authorelumni
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161122t020212838z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-22 02:02:09
last_update2016-11-22 02:02:09
depth1
children1
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length70
author_reputation20,226,515,506,410
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,819,421
net_rshares0
@steemitblog ·
Steemit will be providing an official release for the upgrade described here by Tuesday November 29th. There is currently a pre-release available for audit. Witnesses will need to choose to upgrade or not by December 6th, which would be the earliest the changes would take effect.
properties (22)
authorsteemitblog
permlinkre-elumni-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161122t024436547z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-22 02:44:36
last_update2016-11-22 02:44:36
depth2
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length280
author_reputation332,472,558,821,177
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,819,594
net_rshares0
@ericvancewalton · (edited)
I think these changes are going to make a substantial difference. Thanks!
πŸ‘  , , ,
properties (23)
authorericvancewalton
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t162655812z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 16:26:57
last_update2016-11-18 16:28:36
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length73
author_reputation1,418,561,502,581,844
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,796,024
net_rshares364,714,865,762
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@ervin-lemark ·
Congrats for the post and a clear message to the community! Yes, the end of this year will be exciting in Steemitverse :)

I can see many advantages coming out of these changes. And some potential drawbacks. Steem price could go down a bit more if the quicker powering down will be *abused*.  But, in the long run, I can see this hard fork as a sign of more stable and prospering times ahead.

And yes, I will mine steem on Linux. At least now we ordinary people will have a change of mining successfully :)

Power on!
properties (22)
authorervin-lemark
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t201714864z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 20:17:15
last_update2016-11-18 20:17:15
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length518
author_reputation475,391,337,706,957
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,797,558
net_rshares0
@everittdmickey ·
I think I like the idea of that hash thing.
Does it mean that I can mine too?
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authoreverittdmickey
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t150747742z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 15:07:48
last_update2016-11-18 15:07:48
depth1
children6
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length77
author_reputation237,810,557,737,590
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,465
net_rshares11,363,613,354
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@thecryptofiend ·
Yes.  You can already mine though - it is just unlikely you will get many blocks (compared to before) as one or two people are dominating the mining queue via means which we are not completely sure about.  The hope is that switching to Equihash will remove any advantage that they have right now.
properties (22)
authorthecryptofiend
permlinkre-everittdmickey-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t152217139z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 15:22:15
last_update2016-11-18 15:22:15
depth2
children5
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length296
author_reputation323,603,913,866,384
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,551
net_rshares0
@everittdmickey ·
"you can still mine"...if I get the chance, which I probably won't.
so I can't mine
the new change will mean I'll get the chance.
so I will be able to mine?
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authoreverittdmickey
permlinkre-thecryptofiend-re-everittdmickey-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t153538766z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 15:35:39
last_update2016-11-18 15:35:39
depth3
children4
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length156
author_reputation237,810,557,737,590
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,654
net_rshares11,363,628,811
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@exploretraveler ·
With these changes the incentive to move more Bitcoin into Steem will be considered, We will ask @johngentry to plan on more investments into the @exploretraveler account for FY17. This is very exciting :-)
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorexploretraveler
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161119t174038012z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"users":["johngentry","exploretraveler"]}
created2016-11-19 17:40:36
last_update2016-11-19 17:40:36
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length206
author_reputation194,809,188,791,591
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,802,897
net_rshares63,875,011,768
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@favorit ·
http://savepic.ru/12268584.jpg
properties (22)
authorfavorit
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t165829525z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"image":["http://savepic.ru/12268584.jpg"]}
created2016-11-18 16:58:18
last_update2016-11-18 16:58:18
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length30
author_reputation29,133,577,502,196
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,796,257
net_rshares0
@freebornangel ·
Why does the internal sbd conversion happen over the next 3 days rather than using the rate from the proceeding three days?
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authorfreebornangel
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t150711376z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 15:07:21
last_update2016-11-18 15:07:21
depth1
children2
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length123
author_reputation171,005,551,503,977
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,463
net_rshares347,107,923,923
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@steemitblog ·
Market manipulation and information advantage.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorsteemitblog
permlinkre-freebornangel-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t153627027z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 15:36:27
last_update2016-11-18 15:36:27
depth2
children1
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length46
author_reputation332,472,558,821,177
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,658
net_rshares277,403,428
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@freebornangel ·
Oh,.....ok,....thanks.
properties (22)
authorfreebornangel
permlinkre-steemitblog-re-freebornangel-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t153922729z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 15:39:33
last_update2016-11-18 15:39:33
depth3
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length22
author_reputation171,005,551,503,977
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,674
net_rshares0
@furryruby ·
Do you know how the progress, the new STEEM is created and distributed to reward pool, vesting fund and witness, is recorded in the blockchain?
properties (22)
authorfurryruby
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20180418t033537878z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-04-18 03:35:39
last_update2018-04-18 03:35:39
depth1
children0
last_payout2018-04-25 03:35:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length143
author_reputation1,304,594,985
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id50,682,344
net_rshares0
@guarddog ·
$0.02
To be honest I'm totally lost on all this. I am new to this world and have much to learn. As long as it proves to be beneficial to those posting on Steemit I'm all for it.
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authorguarddog
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-201785t19720393z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"app":"chainbb/0.3","format":"markdown+html","tags":[]}
created2017-08-06 00:07:21
last_update2017-08-06 00:07:21
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-08-13 00:07:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.023 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length171
author_reputation1,547,611,072,237
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries
0.
accountchainbb
weight1,500
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id10,895,973
net_rshares7,277,214,048
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@ianstrat · (edited)
Many thanks for the information
properties (22)
authorianstrat
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t152444927z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 15:24:48
last_update2016-11-18 15:25:30
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length31
author_reputation12,786,084,463,699
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,570
net_rshares0
@inertia ·
| Full STEEM Ahead*!!* |
|:-:|
| https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/x/full-steam-ahead-6853469.jpg |
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
authorinertia
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t153134343z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"image":["https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/x/full-steam-ahead-6853469.jpg"]}
created2016-11-18 15:31:33
last_update2016-11-18 15:31:33
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length95
author_reputation346,568,901,399,561
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,619
net_rshares161,689,775,120
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@itsjoeco ·
Wow - big changes!
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authoritsjoeco
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t145750281z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 14:57:51
last_update2016-11-18 14:57:51
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length18
author_reputation3,299,547,481,773
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,426
net_rshares665,610,100
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@justtryme90 ·
I fully support these changes. Seem like great ideas and should make a good portion of the community happy!
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorjusttryme90
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t152252659z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 15:22:51
last_update2016-11-18 15:22:51
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length107
author_reputation140,118,479,939,905
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,557
net_rshares346,830,520,495
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@kingscrown ·
very nice this should stabilize the price
properties (22)
authorkingscrown
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t225916097z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 22:59:18
last_update2016-11-18 22:59:18
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length41
author_reputation2,115,776,279,560,447
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,798,475
net_rshares0
@krnel · (edited)
Awesome! Thank you! And good news for the 3 month power down in effect when this is implemented. Good job developers!
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
authorkrnel
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t151853093z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 15:18:51
last_update2016-11-18 15:19:48
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length117
author_reputation1,343,547,270,297,082
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,533
net_rshares390,878,786,869
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@lemouth · (edited)
That's a great news! As many steemit users, I am really happy to read this. Since this will also allow all frustrated users to leave Steemit quickly, I think that we may have to be ready for three difficult months in terms of Steem price.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorlemouth
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t161633126z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 16:16:36
last_update2016-11-18 16:20:48
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length238
author_reputation338,011,164,701,274
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,943
net_rshares18,855,315,448
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@lindee-hamner ·
I'm so happy about the powering down!
properties (22)
authorlindee-hamner
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t163858661z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 16:38:57
last_update2016-11-18 16:38:57
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length37
author_reputation3,503,558,664,914
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,796,120
net_rshares0
@linkback-bot-v0 ·
This post has been linked to from another place on Steem.


  - [Experimental Crowdsourced Steem Metrics Report for 18th November 2016](https://steemit.com/steemit/@ontofractal/experimental-crowdsourced-steem-metrics-report-for-18th-november-2016) by @ontofractal

  - [Fighting Steem Daemon #3](https://steemit.com/steemd/@felixxx/fighting-steem-daemon-3) by @felixxx

  - [The reason why I am powering down this account, why I will continue doing so even after hardfork and why I think you would do the the same :)](https://steemit.com/steemit/@repholder/the-reason-why-i-am-powering-down-this-account-why-i-will-continue-doing-so-even-after-hardfork-and-why-i-think-you-would-do-the) by @repholder

  - [NEDTALK on SteemSpeak Radio - November 18 2016](https://steemit.com/ned/@steemspeak/nedtalk-on-steemspeak-radio-november-18-2016) by @steemspeak

  - [Abit Witness Log 2016-11-12 ~ 2016-11-18](https://steemit.com/witness-category/@abit/abit-witness-log-2016-11-12-2016-11-18) by @abit

  - [ν•˜λ“œν¬ν¬ 일정, 바뀐점, κ³„νš (steemitblog 의 κΈ€)](https://steemit.com/kr/@morning/steemitblog) by @morning

  - [STEEM FOMO](https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@craig-grant/steem-fomo) by @craig-grant

  - [Curation accumulation](https://steemit.com/steemit/@steevc/curation-accumulation) by @steevc




Learn more about and upvote to support [**linkback bot v0.5**](https://steemit.com/steemit/@ontofractal/steem-linkback-bot-v0-5-the-reddit-awareness-release). Flag this comment if you don't want the bot to continue posting linkbacks for your posts.

Built by @ontofractal
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authorlinkback-bot-v0
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-linkbacks
categorysteem
json_metadata{}
created2016-11-19 16:43:33
last_update2016-11-19 16:43:33
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,560
author_reputation1,915,954,976,722
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,802,538
net_rshares385,230,958,101
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@majes ·
Thanks for the update, It is appreciated...

Steem On!
properties (22)
authormajes
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t153818275z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 15:38:18
last_update2016-11-18 15:38:18
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length54
author_reputation132,839,043,973,673
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,666
net_rshares0
@mindhunter ·
@mindhunter will never power down - I am here to create - I am not here for the money :) I am here to live my life, not to make people understand :))
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authormindhunter
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t162952376z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"users":["mindhunter"]}
created2016-11-18 16:29:57
last_update2016-11-18 16:29:57
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length149
author_reputation203,929,529,404,460
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,796,046
net_rshares3,544,930,516
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@moon32walker ·
First few months will be depressing for steem price. After things settle down people will see the potential and we might moonwalk again. One thing is certain, it is never boring on steemit :)
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authormoon32walker
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t165126498z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 16:51:33
last_update2016-11-18 16:51:33
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length191
author_reputation149,463,019,364,353
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,796,205
net_rshares21,051,447,954
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@nikolay-babenko · (edited)
Hi, is it already in place? I cannot test powerdown...

I would buy much more SP and power up if I'm sure I can power down in 3 month.
Here is the issue I'm getting when I'm trying to power down now:
https://steemit.com/steemit/@nikolay-babenko/transaction-broadcast-error-on-powerdown
properties (22)
authornikolay-babenko
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161209t165511668z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steemit/@nikolay-babenko/transaction-broadcast-error-on-powerdown"]}
created2016-12-09 16:55:12
last_update2016-12-09 16:55:30
depth1
children1
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length285
author_reputation59,121,347,080
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,962,389
net_rshares0
@abit ·
Yes it's in place.
properties (22)
authorabit
permlinkre-nikolay-babenko-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161211t025414909z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-12-11 02:54:33
last_update2016-12-11 02:54:33
depth2
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length18
author_reputation141,171,499,037,785
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,973,717
net_rshares0
@powerup ·
I will power down during 3 months when this is implemented.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorpowerup
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t160919918z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 16:09:57
last_update2016-11-18 16:09:57
depth1
children5
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length59
author_reputation4,226,921,418,163
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,891
net_rshares529,152,371,774
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@joanaltres · (edited)
I'm not powering down squat. In fact, I just invested $700 into  Steem Power from my Bitcoin wallet about 2 hours ago. The price of Bitcoin dropped $10 just 5 minutes after the transaction cleared too. Talk about perfect timing. Lol. And now Bitcoin has dropped ANOTHER $10 in just the past hour. Wow. :)
properties (22)
authorjoanaltres
permlinkre-powerup-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161120t154312030z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-20 15:43:18
last_update2016-11-20 15:43:45
depth2
children2
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length304
author_reputation3,350,997,703,778
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,808,353
net_rshares0
@dailybitcoinnews ·
I saw that drop, and was exchanging during that, so good for you!
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authordailybitcoinnews
permlinkre-joanaltres-re-powerup-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161121t075258873z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-21 07:53:09
last_update2016-11-21 07:53:09
depth3
children1
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length65
author_reputation90,771,889,126,829
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,813,494
net_rshares56,862,271,938
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@smooth ·
If you don't mind expanding a bit, I'm curious why you will do this.
properties (22)
authorsmooth
permlinkre-powerup-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161119t082807300z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-19 08:28:06
last_update2016-11-19 08:28:06
depth2
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length68
author_reputation260,342,945,372,716
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,800,684
net_rshares0
@taoteh1221 ·
I'm probably going to power down 33% of my SP the first month, not sure if I am going to sell any though. 1.425% APR on STEEM Power is a lot better than any bank CD / IRA.
properties (22)
authortaoteh1221
permlinkre-powerup-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t184705654z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 18:47:03
last_update2016-11-18 18:47:03
depth2
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length171
author_reputation12,021,365,969,253
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,796,961
net_rshares0
@riverhead ·
$0.03
Witness Riverhead will be participating in this fork.
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorriverhead
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t160012098z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 16:00:12
last_update2016-11-18 16:00:12
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.024 HBD
curator_payout_value0.007 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length53
author_reputation12,486,999,157,746
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,821
net_rshares1,092,369,817,548
author_curate_reward""
vote details (9)
@shadowspub ·
http://i.imgur.com/SsfejKK.jpg
Hi @steemitblog, I just stopped back to let you know your post was one of my favourite reads yesterday and I included it in my Steemit Ramble. [You can read what I wrote about your post here.](https://steemit.com/curation/@shadowspub/46-nov-21-steemit-ramble-don-t-you-hate-missing-good-posts)
πŸ‘  
πŸ‘Ž  
properties (23)
authorshadowspub
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161122t132148235z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"users":["steemitblog"],"image":["http://i.imgur.com/SsfejKK.jpg"],"links":["https://steemit.com/curation/@shadowspub/46-nov-21-steemit-ramble-don-t-you-hate-missing-good-posts"]}
created2016-11-22 13:21:51
last_update2016-11-22 13:21:51
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length324
author_reputation637,879,812,470,190
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,822,146
net_rshares-263,423,471,391
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@smooth ·
$0.48
Overall the Steemit team did an excellent job listening to input and preparing this revised proposal. Despite the fact that it doesn't specifically address my concern of abrupt and unnecessary cuts to both witness and content rewards, nor my concern about changing too much at one time, I recognize that there are several compromises woven into the proposal and in its totality there is lot to like about it. I expect to be supporting the update.

I agree with @blocktrades in favoring a significant period for publicizing the changes before they go into effect, which should include an active effort by both the team and community to reach out to cryptocurrency news sites, bloggers, podcasts, etc. to make them aware of the changes and what they mean for Steem going forward. While there can indeed be a greater synergy between the currency, social, and content aspects of the network, that synergy can't be realized if no one knows about it.
πŸ‘  , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorsmooth
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161119t084230800z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"users":["blocktrades"]}
created2016-11-19 08:42:30
last_update2016-11-19 08:42:30
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.477 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length944
author_reputation260,342,945,372,716
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,800,708
net_rshares6,849,973,532,802
author_curate_reward""
vote details (7)
@srvjeet ·
let's see if it works 
Leave a like if u like tweaking assessmentπŸ˜‚
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorsrvjeet
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20190511t075135316z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2019-05-11 07:51:42
last_update2019-05-11 07:51:42
depth1
children0
last_payout2019-05-18 07:51:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length66
author_reputation34,025,419
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id84,653,023
net_rshares543,668,909
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@srvjeet ·
Let's see if it worksπŸ˜…
Leave a like if u like twerking asses πŸ˜‚
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorsrvjeet
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20190511t075240733z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2019-05-11 07:52:48
last_update2019-05-11 07:52:48
depth1
children0
last_payout2019-05-18 07:52:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length62
author_reputation34,025,419
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id84,653,076
net_rshares548,565,508
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@stealthtrader ·
Is there going to be a limited supply now..
And is that limit 250 million?
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authorstealthtrader
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t171853149z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 17:18:54
last_update2016-11-18 17:18:54
depth1
children2
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length74
author_reputation74,266,337,461,760
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,796,365
net_rshares378,384,933,268
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@dantheman ·
$0.03
Compared to what we have today, the supply will be heavily limited.   The long term inflation rate will be less than 1% which should be hit in about 20 years.   

The long term supply will be about 639,276,802.000 STEEM after 20 years.  If STEEM goes up in value over that time then the supply may be lower due to Steem Dollars converting to fewer STEEM over time.  If STEEM goes down in value it may be higher for the same reason.
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authordantheman
permlinkre-stealthtrader-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t173911453z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 17:39:09
last_update2016-11-18 17:39:09
depth2
children1
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.031 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length431
author_reputation240,292,002,602,347
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,796,509
net_rshares1,291,204,334,743
author_curate_reward""
vote details (11)
@stealthtrader ·
That makes perfect sense thanks for clearing that up.. Excited about the future!
properties (22)
authorstealthtrader
permlinkre-dantheman-re-stealthtrader-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t174101899z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 17:41:00
last_update2016-11-18 17:41:00
depth3
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length80
author_reputation74,266,337,461,760
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,796,525
net_rshares0
@steemboost ·
Wow! This is a good time to give STEEM a BOOST! Can anyone tell me where can I find out more about mining? I would love to mine some STEEM! Thank you!
properties (22)
authorsteemboost
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161119t032836066z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-19 03:28:36
last_update2016-11-19 03:28:36
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length150
author_reputation4,503,702,000,575
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,799,813
net_rshares0
@steempowerwhale ·
Steemit is the best way and easiest way to onboard new users to cryptocurrencies and indirectly to the blockchain. Playing along the line of Steem as a currency will allow many more use scenarios besides the social content focus. In the coming days/weeks I will be blogging about it.
properties (22)
authorsteempowerwhale
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t154040863z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 15:40:45
last_update2016-11-18 15:40:45
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length283
author_reputation6,727,613,422,973
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,689
net_rshares0
@steevc ·
I can't claim to fully understand all the implications of these changes, but I expect to see more powering down in the short term. I can appreciate that people want the money. Even with the change that would only give me a few dollars per week, so I probably won't bother. Interesting times for Steemit
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorsteevc
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t150023770z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 14:59:06
last_update2016-11-18 14:59:06
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length302
author_reputation1,396,836,247,219,334
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,431
net_rshares22,792,429,470
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@tarekadam ·
I am looking very much forward to these changes. I expect a great increase in market value once the supply is reduced and all the awesome projects in the pipeline (e.g. Busy) are live. Great work Steemit!
properties (22)
authortarekadam
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t162051950z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 16:20:51
last_update2016-11-18 16:20:51
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length204
author_reputation50,131,776,387,207
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,984
net_rshares0
@teamsteem ·
I fully support those changes. Those changes really look awesome. I feel good about those changes and I look forward to update my witness when the new release is made available.
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
authorteamsteem
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161119t020034304z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-19 02:00:30
last_update2016-11-19 02:00:30
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length177
author_reputation284,804,541,406,803
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,799,445
net_rshares39,500,800,728
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@thecryptofiend ·
$0.11
**Thanks.  I'm 100% in favour of the changes.  I think a serious platform needs to evolve in line with market and community needs.**  

That is why I have spent thousands of my own dollars in powering up (a lot of money for me) and why I will continue to support the platform.  

#### I know that some people have suggested eliminating mining altogether but I feel that would be a mistake both perceptually and also in increasing centralisation.  

The solution to one or two people dominating mining is not to remove it but to implement measures which make it more difficult for this to happen.  Equihash should make it easier for regular people to compete in mining.

_I would suggest that if Equihash becomes similarly compromised/dominated in the future (quite likely) we should look at changing again and keep evolving the mining to keep it fair and decentralised._

#### I would also suggest we need a simple mining solution to allow non technical people to get mining on Windows and OS X.

A 1-click miner for Windows/OS-X would be fantastic PR for Steemit and also allow new users to get involved and support the network in a different kind of way.

_I would be happy to even contribute some of my own limited bitcoins/SD towards development of this.  Sadly I don't have the technical skills to develop this myself but I know we have many people in the community who can._
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorthecryptofiend
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t151016061z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 15:10:15
last_update2016-11-18 15:10:15
depth1
children16
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.104 HBD
curator_payout_value0.002 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,380
author_reputation323,603,913,866,384
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,477
net_rshares2,725,557,629,003
author_curate_reward""
vote details (27)
@mrosenquist ·
I agree, we must support Windows users as part of the mining activity.  This will convey a mainstream (mainsteem) appeal and include more people into the overall front and backend of Steem/Steemit.  Otherwise, the perception is this is a  tech experiment on the fringe.  The 'beta' moniker also reinforces this.
πŸ‘  , , , ,
properties (23)
authormrosenquist
permlinkre-thecryptofiend-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t180401753z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 18:04:06
last_update2016-11-18 18:04:06
depth2
children5
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length311
author_reputation179,260,269,111,678
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,796,689
net_rshares128,062,984,140
author_curate_reward""
vote details (5)
@thecryptofiend ·
Yes perception and image is just as important as the substance behind the platform.  We must not give the appearance of being exclusionary or elitist.
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
authorthecryptofiend
permlinkre-mrosenquist-re-thecryptofiend-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t180555963z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 18:05:54
last_update2016-11-18 18:05:54
depth3
children4
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length150
author_reputation323,603,913,866,384
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,796,701
net_rshares56,602,997,425
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@steemitblog ·
$0.03
We will no longer support windows due to limits on 3rd party libraries in use.
πŸ‘  , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorsteemitblog
permlinkre-thecryptofiend-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t152803852z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 15:28:03
last_update2016-11-18 15:28:03
depth2
children8
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.023 HBD
curator_payout_value0.007 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length78
author_reputation332,472,558,821,177
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,597
net_rshares1,075,183,029,120
author_curate_reward""
vote details (6)
@thecryptofiend · (edited)
$0.03
There must be some way around it though?  I think this is an important issue as the vast majority of people will never use linux.  It would be a mistake to exclude 90% plus of the users from mining.  It simply does not look good from a marketing/PR perspective and gives more ammunition to the detractors.
πŸ‘  , , ,
properties (23)
authorthecryptofiend
permlinkre-steemitblog-re-thecryptofiend-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t153105071z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 15:31:03
last_update2016-11-18 15:35:27
depth3
children5
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.033 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length305
author_reputation323,603,913,866,384
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,615
net_rshares906,018,309,350
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@tinfoilfedora ·
You have got to be kidding.
properties (22)
authortinfoilfedora
permlinkre-steemitblog-re-thecryptofiend-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161119t192125200z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-19 19:21:27
last_update2016-11-19 19:21:27
depth3
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length27
author_reputation20,279,768,518,195
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,803,439
net_rshares0
@walhallo777 ·
Hello please tell me the huskies have a limit? how much can you put in a day? and if not difficult to you tell me how to climb with the help of likes ?
properties (22)
authorwalhallo777
permlinkre-steemitblog-re-thecryptofiend-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161214t164557346z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-12-14 16:46:03
last_update2016-12-14 16:46:03
depth3
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length151
author_reputation20,668,065,379,670
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,003,475
net_rshares0
@xplice ·
I've been mining Zcash on Windows for a few weeks now, easy to set up. Equihash is awesome. Great move switching to that algorithm.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorxplice
permlinkre-thecryptofiend-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161125t005437041z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-25 00:54:39
last_update2016-11-25 00:54:39
depth2
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length131
author_reputation547,157,683
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,841,183
net_rshares12,131,207,168
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@thejohalfiles ·
Very nice. Great work @steemitblog
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorthejohalfiles
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t151831806z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"users":["steemitblog"]}
created2016-11-18 15:18:33
last_update2016-11-18 15:18:33
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length34
author_reputation10,452,104,581,740
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,532
net_rshares665,610,100
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@tibonova ·
$0.03
After the changes if you update the white paper, I will put it to my reading list.
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
authortibonova
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t175557744z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 17:55:57
last_update2016-11-18 17:55:57
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.024 HBD
curator_payout_value0.007 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length82
author_reputation12,908,383,350,876
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,796,636
net_rshares1,083,812,041,473
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@virtualgrowth ·
Thanks for the updates dan! :)
Shared on [twitter](https://twitter.com/Steem_Land/status/799631702184382473)
πŸ‘  , , ,
properties (23)
authorvirtualgrowth
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t151539637z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"links":["https://twitter.com/Steem_Land/status/799631702184382473"]}
created2016-11-18 15:15:45
last_update2016-11-18 15:15:45
depth1
children1
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length108
author_reputation194,321,283,719,708
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,515
net_rshares20,489,844,510
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@twitterbot ·
### ![Steem_Land](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/796481381366804481/GZiD2MS0_normal.jpg) **[Steemland.com](https://twitter.com/@Steem_Land/status/799631702184382473)** tweeted @ 18 Nov 2016 - 15:13 UTC

> Final Review of Steem Economic Changes β€” Steemit [steemit.com/steem/@steemit…](https://t.co/gGw1G5ZLHQ)
@SteemUps @SteemitPosts @steemit @steemiobot @Beyond_Bitcoin


###### *Disclaimer: I am just a bot trying to be helpful.*
properties (22)
authortwitterbot
permlinkre-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t151539637z-20161118t151659
categorysteem
json_metadata""
created2016-11-18 15:17:00
last_update2016-11-18 15:17:00
depth2
children0
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length436
author_reputation2,792,128,643,772
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,795,521
net_rshares0
@xeldal ·
$0.03
Excellent!  Witness xeldal fully supports the above changes and will be upgrading when released.  Great work on listening to the valuable feedback from the community.  I'm very please with the direction we're moving with this.
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorxeldal
permlinkre-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t172529558z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-11-18 17:25:30
last_update2016-11-18 17:25:30
depth1
children1
last_payout2016-12-19 17:46:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.031 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length226
author_reputation8,668,390,161,180
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,796,400
net_rshares957,895,165,213
author_curate_reward""
vote details (9)
@biophil ·
Hello, I imagine that you'll never get this message. Nonetheless, I'd like to make a business proposition:

I've noticed that you're not really doing anything with much of your Steem Power right now. **Would you care to delegate some SP to me for a fee?**

I'm building a new voting application and I hope to fund it with something on the order of 50,000 SP, for which I'd gladly pay 100 STEEM per week.

My application will *not* be used for self-voting; it will only vote on others' comments.

If you get this, let me know what you think.
properties (22)
authorbiophil
permlinkre-xeldal-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20170623t173908399z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-06-23 17:39:09
last_update2017-06-23 17:39:09
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-06-30 17:39:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length540
author_reputation45,223,914,794,461
root_title"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id5,800,396
net_rshares0