RE: Final Review of Steem Economic Changes by steemitblog

View this thread on: hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

Viewing a response to: @thecryptofiend/re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t151016061z

steem · @steemitblog · Nov 18 '16

$0.03

We will no longer support windows due to limits on 3rd party libraries in use.

👍 jamesc, taoteh1221, heimindanger, thecryptofiend, renuccio, tibonova

`author`	steemitblog
`permlink`	re-thecryptofiend-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t152803852z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"]}
`created`	2016-11-18 15:28:03
`last_update`	2016-11-18 15:28:03
`depth`	2
`children`	8
`last_payout`	2016-12-19 17:46:27
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.023 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.007 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	78
`author_reputation`	332,472,558,821,177
`root_title`	"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	1,795,597
`net_rshares`	1,075,183,029,120
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (6)

voter	rshares	pct
jamesc	690,448,977,974	1%
thecryptofiend	11,363,613,354	1%
taoteh1221	354,708,790,293	100%
heimindanger	17,681,825,770	100%
renuccio	702,418,301	100%
tibonova	277,403,428	100%

@thecryptofiend · Nov 18 '16 (edited)

$0.03

There must be some way around it though?  I think this is an important issue as the vast majority of people will never use linux.  It would be a mistake to exclude 90% plus of the users from mining.  It simply does not look good from a marketing/PR perspective and gives more ammunition to the detractors.

👍 cryptogee, charlie777pt, finleyexp, networker5

`author`	thecryptofiend
`permlink`	re-steemitblog-re-thecryptofiend-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t153105071z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"]}
`created`	2016-11-18 15:31:03
`last_update`	2016-11-18 15:35:27
`depth`	3
`children`	5
`last_payout`	2016-12-19 17:46:27
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.033 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	305
`author_reputation`	323,603,913,866,384
`root_title`	"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	1,795,615
`net_rshares`	906,018,309,350
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (4)

voter	rshares	pct
cryptogee	902,590,189,634	100%
charlie777pt	2,984,486,832	100%
finleyexp	443,632,884	100%
networker5	0	100%

@smooth · Nov 19 '16

Using docker or another virtual machine is an available workaround.

👍 l0k1, thecryptofiend

`author`	smooth
`permlink`	re-thecryptofiend-re-steemitblog-re-thecryptofiend-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161119t082719100z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"]}
`created`	2016-11-19 08:27:18
`last_update`	2016-11-19 08:27:18
`depth`	4
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2016-12-19 17:46:27
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	67
`author_reputation`	253,602,537,834,068
`root_title`	"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	1,800,682
`net_rshares`	52,489,166,986
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
thecryptofiend	0 B		11,404,101,446	1%
l0k1	0 B		41,085,065,540	100%

@steemitblog · Nov 18 '16

Someone could create a mining pool with a standalone miner.

👍 thecryptofiend, joanaltres, networker5

`author`	steemitblog
`permlink`	re-thecryptofiend-re-steemitblog-re-thecryptofiend-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t153933973z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"]}
`created`	2016-11-18 15:39:33
`last_update`	2016-11-18 15:39:33
`depth`	4
`children`	3
`last_payout`	2016-12-19 17:46:27
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	59
`author_reputation`	332,472,558,821,177
`root_title`	"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	1,795,675
`net_rshares`	17,411,442,781
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (3)

voter	rshares	pct
thecryptofiend	11,363,633,292	1%
joanaltres	6,047,809,489	100%
networker5	0	100%

@thecryptofiend · Nov 18 '16

Interesting - like a [Minergate](https://minergate.com) type setup?  

That would be ideal. 

I have a number of friends who were very non-technical and wouldn't even dare using regular miners (even on Windows) but they use their spare CPU/GPU time to mine using Minergate.  

It makes it really easy for new users so something like that would be perfect.  

Obviously the issue of centralisation comes up if there is a single pool doing it though.

👍 tonyson4078, dailybitcoinnews, joanaltres, charlie777pt, networker5

`author`	thecryptofiend
`permlink`	re-steemitblog-re-thecryptofiend-re-steemitblog-re-thecryptofiend-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161118t154515413z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"],"links":["https://minergate.com"]}
`created`	2016-11-18 15:45:15
`last_update`	2016-11-18 15:45:15
`depth`	5
`children`	2
`last_payout`	2016-12-19 17:46:27
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	448
`author_reputation`	323,603,913,866,384
`root_title`	"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	1,795,723
`net_rshares`	165,222,594,174
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (5)

voter	rshares	pct
charlie777pt	2,984,486,832	100%
dailybitcoinnews	10,716,132,643	100%
joanaltres	6,047,809,489	100%
tonyson4078	145,474,165,210	100%
networker5	0	100%

2 replies

@tinfoilfedora · Nov 19 '16

You have got to be kidding.

properties (22)

`author`	tinfoilfedora
`permlink`	re-steemitblog-re-thecryptofiend-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161119t192125200z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"]}
`created`	2016-11-19 19:21:27
`last_update`	2016-11-19 19:21:27
`depth`	3
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2016-12-19 17:46:27
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	27
`author_reputation`	20,279,768,518,195
`root_title`	"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	1,803,439
`net_rshares`	0

@walhallo777 · Dec 14 '16

Hello please tell me the huskies have a limit? how much can you put in a day? and if not difficult to you tell me how to climb with the help of likes ?

properties (22)

`author`	walhallo777
`permlink`	re-steemitblog-re-thecryptofiend-re-steemitblog-final-review-of-steem-economic-changes-20161214t164557346z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"]}
`created`	2016-12-14 16:46:03
`last_update`	2016-12-14 16:46:03
`depth`	3
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2016-12-19 17:46:27
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	151
`author_reputation`	20,668,065,379,670
`root_title`	"Final Review of Steem Economic Changes"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	2,003,475
`net_rshares`	0