create account

Sort By Total Human Eyeball Views Tab: A Request To The Devs by stellabelle

View this thread on: hive.blog |  peakd.com |  ecency.com
steemit · @stellabelle · (edited)
$2.75
Sort By Total Human Eyeball Views Tab: A Request To The Devs
<center>[![wade.jpg](https://s24.postimg.org/h6v2rrbf9/wade.jpg)](https://postimg.org/image/qenb8gihd/)</center>


# The day has arrived that a Steemian has managed to receive 546 real human reads of his article:
https://steemit.com/life/@wadepaterson/20-questions-with-john-goehrke-the-guy-who-landed-a-date-with-genie-bouchard


Why did I miss this? There currently exists no tab on Steemit to show us which posts get the most human reads. I think this should change, very quickly. This is the key to understanding how viral content can be discovered and shared (both on Steemit and on mainstream social media, too.)

Right next to the Promoted Tab, a tab named **EYEBALLS** could be added that would indicate which articles got the most reads/views by actual humans. This would become a _very_ valuable tab! Think about it, you would no longer have to endlessly search on Steemit for content! It would be like the rest of modern-day social sites, that indicate virality. Imagine the beauty and sublime reads!

Today, I'm requesting that this feature be added to a tab so that in the future, we can find posts easily that are appealing both to Steemit users and to users outside of Steemit. Apparently, @wadepaterson's post received 546 human views, mainly because his topic was a viral subject on broader social media, as he shares all his posts on Twitter. The virality on Steemit should coincide with virality on other social media sites. When it doesn't match, there is a problem.

# I've never seen that many reads on _any_ post and I don't want to miss more like this in the future. 

Let's work together on this one, @timcliff, as you can see how missing viral content is a detriment both to this platform and to the readers on this platform. If there's something already in the works, let us know.

Congratulations to @wadepaterson for getting over 546 human eyeballs on your post. That's the most I've ever seen. If you've seen more, let us know.

## Any input from developers would be appreciated. As you can see, this is the value right here. This is what we all should be striving for: 546 real human views.

note: I think this solves the bot issue altogether since the eyeball count is not affected by bot activity. Please correct me if I'm wrong on this.

# Let's Make Steemit Great Again.

And let's _not_ turn into [Black Mirror's](https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2016/10/black-mirror-nosedive-review-season-three-netflix/504668/) Lacy:

http://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/scalefit_630_noupscale/5820f8b8190000a502c31714.jpeg

[Image Source](http://screenertv.com/television/black-mirror-season-3-nosedive-deep-satisfaction/)
👍  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and 117 others
properties (23)
authorstellabelle
permlinksort-by-total-human-eyeball-views-tab-a-request-to-the-devs
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit","trending","dev","eyeballs"],"users":["wadepaterson","timcliff"],"image":["https://s24.postimg.org/h6v2rrbf9/wade.jpg","http://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/scalefit_630_noupscale/5820f8b8190000a502c31714.jpeg"],"links":["https://postimg.org/image/qenb8gihd/","https://steemit.com/life/@wadepaterson/20-questions-with-john-goehrke-the-guy-who-landed-a-date-with-genie-bouchard","https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2016/10/black-mirror-nosedive-review-season-three-netflix/504668/","http://screenertv.com/television/black-mirror-season-3-nosedive-deep-satisfaction/"],"app":"steemit/0.1","format":"markdown"}
created2017-02-08 20:01:51
last_update2017-02-08 20:26:51
depth0
children27
last_payout2017-03-11 20:37:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value2.591 HBD
curator_payout_value0.157 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length2,662
author_reputation516,061,669,130,124
root_title"Sort By Total Human Eyeball Views Tab: A Request To The Devs"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,456,567
net_rshares17,942,651,342,990
author_curate_reward""
vote details (181)
@bola · (edited)
Do proxy bots work on steemit?
properties (22)
authorbola
permlinkre-stellabelle-sort-by-total-human-eyeball-views-tab-a-request-to-the-devs-20170208t200944164z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-02-08 20:09:51
last_update2017-02-08 20:10:36
depth1
children1
last_payout2017-03-11 20:37:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length30
author_reputation51,245,914,991,562
root_title"Sort By Total Human Eyeball Views Tab: A Request To The Devs"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,456,628
net_rshares0
@stellabelle · 
well, the bots are not interacting with the eyeball count. Look at upvotes: 39, but eyeball view count is at 10. The eyeball view count is not affected. I don't know about proxy bot thing you ask.
properties (22)
authorstellabelle
permlinkre-bola-re-stellabelle-sort-by-total-human-eyeball-views-tab-a-request-to-the-devs-20170208t201434261z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-02-08 20:14:33
last_update2017-02-08 20:14:33
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-03-11 20:37:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length196
author_reputation516,061,669,130,124
root_title"Sort By Total Human Eyeball Views Tab: A Request To The Devs"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,456,657
net_rshares0
@craig-grant · 
this can be abused by generating fake views
👍  
properties (23)
authorcraig-grant
permlinkre-stellabelle-sort-by-total-human-eyeball-views-tab-a-request-to-the-devs-20170208t225147883z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-02-08 22:51:54
last_update2017-02-08 22:51:54
depth1
children3
last_payout2017-03-11 20:37:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length43
author_reputation437,808,999,210,623
root_title"Sort By Total Human Eyeball Views Tab: A Request To The Devs"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,457,903
net_rshares360,727,025
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@personz · 
#fakeviews
properties (22)
authorpersonz
permlinkre-craig-grant-re-stellabelle-sort-by-total-human-eyeball-views-tab-a-request-to-the-devs-20170208t231849392z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["fakeviews","steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-02-08 23:18:48
last_update2017-02-08 23:18:48
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-03-11 20:37:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length10
author_reputation42,452,361,038,560
root_title"Sort By Total Human Eyeball Views Tab: A Request To The Devs"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,458,096
net_rshares0
@stellabelle · 
i realize that, however, since it won't result in rewards, humans would be curating from the list. If there are obvious fakers, they can be downvoted.
properties (22)
authorstellabelle
permlinkre-craig-grant-re-stellabelle-sort-by-total-human-eyeball-views-tab-a-request-to-the-devs-20170208t225248315z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-02-08 22:52:48
last_update2017-02-08 22:52:48
depth2
children1
last_payout2017-03-11 20:37:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length150
author_reputation516,061,669,130,124
root_title"Sort By Total Human Eyeball Views Tab: A Request To The Devs"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,457,913
net_rshares0
@craig-grant · 
worth a try
properties (22)
authorcraig-grant
permlinkre-stellabelle-re-craig-grant-re-stellabelle-sort-by-total-human-eyeball-views-tab-a-request-to-the-devs-20170208t225332753z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-02-08 22:53:39
last_update2017-02-08 22:53:39
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-03-11 20:37:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length11
author_reputation437,808,999,210,623
root_title"Sort By Total Human Eyeball Views Tab: A Request To The Devs"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,457,923
net_rshares0
@denmarkguy · 
Interesting to see this brought up... as a pretty much straight writer/blogger (as opposed to developer) this site is curious to me as there is some good content created here, but there's a remarkable lack of "outside eyeballs" looking at it and sharing it. Call me old fashioned, but it seems sad that the moment a new metric is brought up, there's a horde ready to "game it" artificially rather than simply allow it to be an authentic measure of something.

How can this place hope to create community-- and hence any kind of "lasting value"-- absent real human eyeballs to interact with the content?  Unless, of course, the social network function is just window dressing rather than the backbone of the system...
properties (22)
authordenmarkguy
permlinkre-stellabelle-sort-by-total-human-eyeball-views-tab-a-request-to-the-devs-20170209t062037796z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-02-09 06:20:39
last_update2017-02-09 06:20:39
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-03-11 20:37:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length716
author_reputation1,152,662,174,038,439
root_title"Sort By Total Human Eyeball Views Tab: A Request To The Devs"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,460,265
net_rshares0
@mrosenquist · 
I really like the idea, but lets not call it "eyeballs", instead let's call it "views".  Seems more natural.  "my post received 27 views" is better than "my post received 27 eyeballs"  :)

The tab would be valuable as it separates the posts which are upvoted but not read, from those which are read (but perhaps not upvoted).  Both metrics are valuable.
properties (22)
authormrosenquist
permlinkre-stellabelle-sort-by-total-human-eyeball-views-tab-a-request-to-the-devs-20170209t005307333z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-02-09 00:53:09
last_update2017-02-09 00:53:09
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-03-11 20:37:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length353
author_reputation178,190,999,523,720
root_title"Sort By Total Human Eyeball Views Tab: A Request To The Devs"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,458,654
net_rshares0
@neoxian ·
$0.02
You could fake the eyeball count.  It's ripe for abuse..
👍  , ,
properties (23)
authorneoxian
permlinkre-stellabelle-sort-by-total-human-eyeball-views-tab-a-request-to-the-devs-20170208t203535054z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-02-08 20:35:36
last_update2017-02-08 20:35:36
depth1
children3
last_payout2017-03-11 20:37:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.020 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length56
author_reputation167,513,329,359,448
root_title"Sort By Total Human Eyeball Views Tab: A Request To The Devs"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,456,836
net_rshares644,308,515,108
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@sigmajin ·
$0.04
>You could fake the eyeball count. It's ripe for abuse..

qft.  It would be trivially easy to manipulate the eyeball count.  the only reason no one does (that we know of) is that it has no effect on anything.  the moment it starts to matter, it will be manipulated.
👍  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and 936 others
properties (23)
authorsigmajin
permlinkre-neoxian-re-stellabelle-sort-by-total-human-eyeball-views-tab-a-request-to-the-devs-20170208t213514738z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-02-08 21:35:09
last_update2017-02-08 21:35:09
depth2
children1
last_payout2017-03-11 20:37:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.040 HBD
curator_payout_value0.003 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length265
author_reputation35,847,511,233,614
root_title"Sort By Total Human Eyeball Views Tab: A Request To The Devs"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,457,292
net_rshares1,230,427,973,439
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1000)
@stellabelle · 
true. I still think there must be a way to sort the posts by actual popularity and reads. There must be a way.....
👍  
properties (23)
authorstellabelle
permlinkre-sigmajin-re-neoxian-re-stellabelle-sort-by-total-human-eyeball-views-tab-a-request-to-the-devs-20170208t224608360z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-02-08 22:46:09
last_update2017-02-08 22:46:09
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-03-11 20:37:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length114
author_reputation516,061,669,130,124
root_title"Sort By Total Human Eyeball Views Tab: A Request To The Devs"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,457,861
net_rshares43,103,835,519
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@stellabelle · 
if the posts that ended up on the eyeball trending list were obviously fake, people could start flagging them, thereby reducing their reputation, thereby discouraging that kind of abuse.
properties (22)
authorstellabelle
permlinkre-neoxian-re-stellabelle-sort-by-total-human-eyeball-views-tab-a-request-to-the-devs-20170208t224657061z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-02-08 22:46:57
last_update2017-02-08 22:46:57
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-03-11 20:37:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length186
author_reputation516,061,669,130,124
root_title"Sort By Total Human Eyeball Views Tab: A Request To The Devs"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,457,867
net_rshares0
@personz ·
$0.06
⬆️  💯
👍  
properties (23)
authorpersonz
permlinkre-stellabelle-sort-by-total-human-eyeball-views-tab-a-request-to-the-devs-20170208t201010850z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-02-08 20:10:09
last_update2017-02-08 20:10:09
depth1
children3
last_payout2017-03-11 20:37:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.059 HBD
curator_payout_value0.001 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length5
author_reputation42,452,361,038,560
root_title"Sort By Total Human Eyeball Views Tab: A Request To The Devs"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,456,630
net_rshares1,571,941,107,470
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@stellabelle · 
http://i.giphy.com/5b2CrBksLiZnq.gif
properties (22)
authorstellabelle
permlinkre-personz-re-stellabelle-sort-by-total-human-eyeball-views-tab-a-request-to-the-devs-20170208t201256811z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"image":["http://i.giphy.com/5b2CrBksLiZnq.gif"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-02-08 20:12:57
last_update2017-02-08 20:12:57
depth2
children2
last_payout2017-03-11 20:37:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length36
author_reputation516,061,669,130,124
root_title"Sort By Total Human Eyeball Views Tab: A Request To The Devs"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,456,650
net_rshares0
@personz ·
$0.06
![](http://i.giphy.com/C8OKgpo83XyUg.gif)
👍  
properties (23)
authorpersonz
permlinkre-stellabelle-re-personz-re-stellabelle-sort-by-total-human-eyeball-views-tab-a-request-to-the-devs-20170208t201539287z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"image":["http://i.giphy.com/C8OKgpo83XyUg.gif"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-02-08 20:15:39
last_update2017-02-08 20:15:39
depth3
children1
last_payout2017-03-11 20:37:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.057 HBD
curator_payout_value0.002 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length41
author_reputation42,452,361,038,560
root_title"Sort By Total Human Eyeball Views Tab: A Request To The Devs"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,456,663
net_rshares1,571,941,107,470
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@screenname ·
Re: Sort By Total Human Eyeball Views Tab: A Request To The Devs
<p>This post has been ranked within the top 25 most undervalued posts in the second half of Feb 08. We estimate that this post is undervalued by $15.59 as compared to a scenario in which every voter had an equal say.</p> 
<p>See the full rankings and details in <a href="https://steemit.com/curation/@screenname/the-daily-tribune-most-undervalued-posts-of-feb-08---part-ii">The Daily Tribune: Feb 08 - Part II</a>. You can also read about some of our methodology, data analysis and technical details in <a href="https://steemit.com/curation/@screenname/introducing-the-daily-tribune-most-undervalued-posts-of-nov-04---part-i">our initial post</a>.</p>
<p>If you are the author and would prefer not to receive these comments, simply reply "Stop" to this comment.</p>
👍  
👎  
properties (23)
authorscreenname
permlinkre-sort-by-total-human-eyeball-views-tab-a-request-to-the-devs-20170209t010849
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"replyto": "@stellabelle/sort-by-total-human-eyeball-views-tab-a-request-to-the-devs"}"
created2017-02-09 01:08:51
last_update2017-02-09 01:08:51
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-03-11 20:37:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length766
author_reputation46,276,338,038,330
root_title"Sort By Total Human Eyeball Views Tab: A Request To The Devs"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,458,748
net_rshares282,577,819
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@timcliff · 
Here is the GitHub issue for it:
https://github.com/steemit/steemit.com/issues/812
properties (22)
authortimcliff
permlinkre-stellabelle-sort-by-total-human-eyeball-views-tab-a-request-to-the-devs-20170208t231547397z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"links":["https://github.com/steemit/steemit.com/issues/812"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-02-08 23:15:48
last_update2017-02-08 23:15:48
depth1
children9
last_payout2017-03-11 20:37:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length82
author_reputation272,954,445,077,789
root_title"Sort By Total Human Eyeball Views Tab: A Request To The Devs"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,458,076
net_rshares0
@stellabelle · (edited)
do you think by having this exist that people will begin gaming it even though there is not a reward structure in place? Don't you think that humans will be able to tell which posts are gamed (with bots) and which ones are actually popular reads? We could as a group downvote any posts that are clearly gamed....
I just created a github account and added my opinion. i've finally caved in.....
👍  
properties (23)
authorstellabelle
permlinkre-timcliff-re-stellabelle-sort-by-total-human-eyeball-views-tab-a-request-to-the-devs-20170208t232445486z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-02-08 23:24:45
last_update2017-02-08 23:48:03
depth2
children4
last_payout2017-03-11 20:37:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length393
author_reputation516,061,669,130,124
root_title"Sort By Total Human Eyeball Views Tab: A Request To The Devs"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,458,126
net_rshares41,824,772,308
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@timcliff · 
When money is involved (and more views translates into a better opportunity to make money) it _will_ be gamed (unfortunately).

Welcome to GitHub :)
properties (22)
authortimcliff
permlinkre-stellabelle-re-timcliff-re-stellabelle-sort-by-total-human-eyeball-views-tab-a-request-to-the-devs-20170209t000537260z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-02-09 00:05:36
last_update2017-02-09 00:05:36
depth3
children3
last_payout2017-03-11 20:37:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length148
author_reputation272,954,445,077,789
root_title"Sort By Total Human Eyeball Views Tab: A Request To The Devs"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,458,367
net_rshares0
@stellabelle · 
Doesn't look promising. The whole idea of having a site that is created in order to find popular reading content, which would grow user base is not considered important. Wow, just wow. The divide between developers and people grows wider.
👍  
properties (23)
authorstellabelle
permlinkre-timcliff-re-stellabelle-sort-by-total-human-eyeball-views-tab-a-request-to-the-devs-20170208t232946695z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-02-08 23:29:45
last_update2017-02-08 23:29:45
depth2
children3
last_payout2017-03-11 20:37:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length238
author_reputation516,061,669,130,124
root_title"Sort By Total Human Eyeball Views Tab: A Request To The Devs"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,458,161
net_rshares41,824,772,308
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@ocrdu · 
All metrics (number of votes, number of views, number of comments) that could be used for selecting content or for (semi-)automatic curating can and will be manipulated as soon as there is the slightest chance of these metrics' influencing rewards. It would also be a problem for my proposal [here](https://steemit.com/steemit/@ocrdu/steem-guild-a-drama-free-proposal-for-an-alternative-approach).

I'm not sure we should let that stop us as the threat of manipulation can kill almost all initiatives, leaving us powerless. Maybe it would be better to just do it and worry about manipulation later, and then strike down hard on any and all manipulators we can find.

Some will argue that the code is the law, so manipulation beyond intended use is allowed, but I don't find that very convincing.
properties (22)
authorocrdu
permlinkre-stellabelle-re-timcliff-re-stellabelle-sort-by-total-human-eyeball-views-tab-a-request-to-the-devs-20170209t151429990z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steemit/@ocrdu/steem-guild-a-drama-free-proposal-for-an-alternative-approach"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-02-09 15:14:30
last_update2017-02-09 15:14:30
depth3
children1
last_payout2017-03-11 20:37:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length795
author_reputation140,931,335,327,250
root_title"Sort By Total Human Eyeball Views Tab: A Request To The Devs"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,463,231
net_rshares0
@timcliff · 
The main problem with it is that if eyeballs were all it took to get a lot of attention, people would game the system to get a lot of eyeballs. (It is not hard to simulate a lot of people viewing the page.) Making the system so that it is not easy to abuse would require a more significant change. Stuff like that is good to have, but it is not at the top of the priority list.
properties (22)
authortimcliff
permlinkre-stellabelle-re-timcliff-re-stellabelle-sort-by-total-human-eyeball-views-tab-a-request-to-the-devs-20170209t000427156z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-02-09 00:04:27
last_update2017-02-09 00:04:27
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-03-11 20:37:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length377
author_reputation272,954,445,077,789
root_title"Sort By Total Human Eyeball Views Tab: A Request To The Devs"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,458,359
net_rshares0
Help/Feedback