Thanks for the sneak preview!

Fantastic to hear the developers are trying to solve all problems, EVEN THOUGH they are potentially hurting themselves!

Good post. I think one or two posts a day is a bit restricting. Maybe 4 or 5 would be more reasonable. Either way, I think members should use the MUTE button more. Spammers will have their voices fall on deaf ears as they reach a smaller audience, the more they spam. Another thing I think would be very helpful would be to make the flag icon more conspicuous, so people use it more, and so people will be alerted to bullshit posts more readily.

Right.  Quality over quantity is always the best approach.

Happy to know a solution is being discussed to solve the nightmare that is currently happening on the steemit/new timeline

Leave it to @dan to think of logical solutions to these problems.  Perhaps we need a "Posting Power" metric to go along with "Voting Power"

some thoughts:
The system probably needs to focus more on rewarding quality bloggers (blogs) over rewarding single content.  Should center more around crediting the blog account for number of subscriptions, kind of like Utube subscriptions.  However In this case the blogger would received an automatic number of (weekly??) up votes based on the number of subscribers and the SteemPower that those subscribers hold.  

The second thing is that there should be a more granular system of up- voting.....something like High, Medium, Low.  This will insure that the up votes apply more appropriately.    Right now the up votes are binary.  Ether you get the vote or you don't.  However quality content is judged on a number of varying perimeters.  ie....  the quality of information provided, the time and effort invested, the intent of the blogger.  Therefore curators should have the ability to award, for example 25%, 50%, or 100% of a vote.  This will help to more equitably and precisely allocate the organizations resources.  

All that said.  Steemit management is an A class team.  I'm sure they are working on some excellent solutions.

You are right, quality, creativity and innovation should be encouraged here! But I agree with the posts that maybe two or three would maybe get the full reward and perhaps it diminishes below that. However I still like your model even if it was just 1. My only question would be that, you can post quality content and if it isn't noticed but 1 is, then that really effects you. It's hit and miss sometimes with posts if that makes sense. This model works under the assumption that each quality post get's exactly what it is worth, rather than the harsh reality that sometimes a quality post isn't noticed for some reason. I hope that makes sense?

I like your post a lot. You may be interested in mine.
https://steemit.com/money/@mrzazaful/mainstream-media-influence-in-steemit

I agree