[3Speak vs Blurt.media](https://blurt.blog/blurt-192372/@agorise/7lxnnh-3speak-vs-blurt-media)
https://media4.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPTc5MGI3NjExYmV5NXRsenZ4b3B6YXJkaHZpOHVyMjRxM2ZmNW5sZjRoc2RmODZ4dSZlcD12MV9pbnRlcm5hbF9naWZfYnlfaWQmY3Q9Zw/ytvUlGZz9o0fxw1e4o/giphy.gif
Do your next book without Publishers Ed!

Pella is a manufacturer of vinyl windows, FYI.  This suggests that repeated URLs in these searches are just paid advertising.  Pella is likely repeated because 'Windows' was what was being searched.  The enemedia stories were probably paying to be shown in search results, is my best guess.  This does reveal that DDG is no different than the other search engines, though, which is good to know.

The 'Indy Search Engine' you propose would be doing without grants from the CIA and other spooks pushing their narrative, whether through NED, USAID, InQTel, or other cutouts or fronts.  I don't believe there is any 'authoritative' sources.  I just think the spooks push the narrative with payment, however that payment is arranged.  It could be tax credits, grants, direct payment, book deals, lower interest rates on home loans for directors of the boards of search engine corporations, free braces for the kids of corporate officers, or any combination - or it could be blackmail too.  That's just how they work.

I bet the limited hangout people even get paid more, because they have to toe a delicate line between what is desirable to put out as a limited hang out, and stepping past that to revelations that are prohibited by the spooks.  Controlled opposition is us.  They need to control what we are focused on when we oppose them, because they have limited means to suppress our objections, or rather, they intend to limit the expenditures on suppressing us.  They have unlimited funding potential, but they seek to be economically efficient, and spend as little as possible to prevent 'escape' of opposition from the 'lunatic fringe' like you and I into the general herd.

Catherine Austin Fitts has done the math that shows if we die younger we end up receiving less retirement benefits, which 'pays down' the purloined $T's without having to publicly acknowledge the fraud.  She points out our government officials are blackmailed, bribed, or bamboozled, or any combination thereof.  This is why attaining independence from the centralized supply lines of goods and services is how to get free of this corruption that is inflicted on us.  When we make what we need outselves, we reduce profit margins overlords get from their investments in mass production of goods and services, and this decreases their ability to corrupt our government officials.

Five Times August makes a very telling point.  Sheeple don't get it.  We have to be able to dissent to grasp the significance of the point he makes.  Ed Dowd does too, but the fact is that it's possible to just render CBDC's irrelevant by not using banks.  I am not a supergenius like Wile E. Coyote.  I'm just inherently rebellious and this was spotted long ago during the psychological profiles they built on all of us in public school.  As a result zersetzung has been applied to me all my life, and I have only recently realized this.  Despite my naivete, I have sidestepped a lot of the methods they used, only succumbing to love, because I am a hopeless romantic.  

When various frauds were serially perpetrated by banks, employers, and courts, I took a beating but still managed to use unconventional mechanisms, like hard money lenders, self employment, and etc., to sidestep their use of zersetzung through these conventional means.  When they managed to take everything I owned using my family to force me to be vulnerable, I learned from that too, and now there just isn't any assets that are worth the trouble to take, and the assets I make use of aren't even owned by me.  The whisper campaign is ineffective because I donate to the mothers, brothers, and children of the whisperers.  Only literally non compos mentus gossips are able to be deployed in zersetzung because of the dedication to benefit of others, and not taking a cut for myself.  This application of goodwill not only breaks zersetzung, it gains me the allies I need to develop decentralized means of production that benefit my allies.  In order to gain those benefits, people make sure I am supported nominally, and that is all I require.

I know you are aware of these things because you have to be making use of them to surmount the challenges you face in New Zealand.  I think a lot of people inherently use these techniques because they are good people, and good people create goodwill.  Good people that realize it's how to get around blackmail, bribery, and bamboozling can do it on purpose, too.

Thanks!