That Will Smith audience is defo AI.

I find Nose Ring Theory compelling.

You're right on the money when you point out that the same people that are saying we need to censor everyone, and track and surveil everything they see or read on the internet to save the children are those that justify starving them to death, blowing them up, shooting them in the head, and raping them in chains in Gaza.  I recently watched Netanyahu state that there were no starving children in Gaza, the media were making it up, and that was why we needed to censor and change algorithms to prevent people from lying.

That's why they want to censor us: to keep us from discussing how they're slaughtering children, degrading society, stealing and defrauding us of $T's, trafficking organs, and pimping kids to politicians to blackmail them and control government to oppress us.  

This is why it's never the good guys that censor.  It's always the criminals trying to get away with their crimes.  The censors are the bad guys, and the excuse that they're only trying to save the children is virtue signaling to conceal their malevolent cruelty and sadistic harm of children.  I bet AI can identify children being abused and locations they're being abused in from video of that abuse that can lead to prosecuting the abusers, which puts the blackmailed politicians and child sex traffickers at risk of prosecution for their crimes, in fact.

The idea of cartoons being banned 'to protect the children' is utterly ludicrous.  It disproves the claim that the purpose of censorship is to protect anyone - except people from their own thoughts.  

This same principle is why we don't have access to data about the jabs.  Today I saw that the first molecular proof that the jabs have been incorporated into human DNA was found in a cancer that had fragments of jab sequences in it's DNA.  The harm the jabs are doing are deliberate, and we are being attacked with bioweapons by the billionaires that own the pharmaceutical corporations and blackmail governments to mandate we get jabbed with these bioweapons that cause cancer, heart disease, and so many more horrible diseases and infertility.  

There is no lawful immunity from genocidal crimes against humanity.  Not only are these horrific crimes that merit capital punishment, but the harms they cause merit tort judgements to compensate survivors.  $T's of assets are rightfully the property of the injured and the principals and investors in the corporations, the US military, and media that have acted to cause this harm need to be ordered by courts to pay their victims for the harm done.  There is no reason, no lawful bar to prosecution for these crimes and tort actions for relief.

There's only corruption, bribery, and blackmail in the way.  

Digitizing our health records is tantamount to handing them to hackers.  I don't want my records available on the internet, nor do I want Big Tech to have my health records at all.  The only people I want to have my health records is me, my family I designate, and my doctors that I designate.  No one else has any right or authority to my health records.  It's another way to create granular biological weapons that can use our health information to make poisons and venoms specifically for us alone.  Nothing about putting my health records in a digital format and storing them in a database benefits me in any way.  Every potential that arises from digitizing my health records is to harm me.

You're absolutely right about why they're trying to kill us off.  They have betrayed us, and when we get around to acting to arrest, charge, and prosecute them for that they will suffer penal or worse sanctions they don't want to suffer.  They're killing us to take our stuff.  They're just ordinary robbers and murderers by law.  Governments are just criminal gangs, taxation is theft, and vaccines are murder.

Regarding Atlas 3I, Avi Loeb is misstating facts about it.  I have recently seen video about it on Odysee that it has not only a tail, but two tails, and it's size is <10KM but it's dense coma causes it to appear larger, and more that Loeb missrepresent, or is just blatantly lying about.  I have zero confidence in Loeb, and think he's a sensationalist grifter profiting from people interested in ayliums.

Thanks!

Edit: link to Odysee video about Atlas 3I that discusses features Loeb either ignores or distorts.

https://odysee.com/@whatdamath:8/3rd-interstellar-comet-just-formed-a:e