managed to find the full vid on youtube PLZ WATCH IT ALL as a lot of interestingpoints and topics discussed/debated respectfully with logic and reason

yes, your comment is posting just fine :)

I'd have to take your word solely that you wouldn't cheat on a partner.  Now if I'd spent ten, fifteen years talking to you, or watching you for years speak, then I could seduce something more of your character as to if you were telling the truth.

Yeah, I think also that with Dershowitz, i'd just add - even if you were trying to do what Sunlit said - you are only seeing him on TV shows. So its an artificial construct, you are not seeing what he is like off stage. 
Thanks!

I could go find it for you if you like.  I tend to not want to spend an hour reviewing stuff when people really aren't going to care because they are part of the objective propaganda being spread.  I actually had to do that the other night over someone challenging me on something so I had to blow it out of the water for them, took me a bit, I warned them I was once a supporter of Trump and defended him on the matter many a times, don't keep coming at me with he never said that especially since they pay little attention to what he does say and more attention to what the media says he said.  I heard him when he said it.  After spending a couple hours putting it back together evidently, they didn't like what I had to say because I haven't heard any argument back.  Once I put the old and new pieces together I told them I might actually have to reconfigure my opinion on the matter.  Not that I was calling him a pedo but he did hire a fifteen year old girl to work in the locker room at Mar A Lago, and said him and Epstein had a fall out over a real estate deal.  Said he hadn't talk to him in about fifteen years or so.  Given the timeline she said she worked there coincidence with his fall out.  So what kind of "real estate" are we talking about here.  

Anyway back to Dershowitz.  The girl even admitted it was animosity towards Dershowitz as to why she made the claim against him because he defended Epstein.  Her whole case fell apart and Dershowitz is confident when the rest of the papers are released he'll be exonerated.  

As far as his editorial piece you should have been honest about that.  He clearly stated he wasn't arguing the point on moral grounds.  I think that if he had added, as he done with a lower age limit, a higher age limit when it came to men also.  But he had a valid point that an 18, 19 year old man can have his entire life tarnished by having sex with a 16, 17 year old girl.  The argument is more along the equivalent of you can be old enough to die for your country but not old enough to have a drink before you die type of situation.  

The thought also didn't escape me that because of his lack of sexual promiscuous involvement those in power could have paid him to be the front guy distraction to the underlying truths.  Something of that nature though would involve being in an exceptional bonded marriage with his wife, because something of that nature would involve her approval, strength to endure the backlash of it all.  She would have to fully acknowledge the faith in their marriage that the whole thing wouldn't come back to bite them by some solid proof of wrongdoing on his behalf.  I am not talking about being paid by Trump or Epstein entirely, if any at that, but I wouldn't put it past the Clintons at all since he's escape culprit- ability his entire life over his sexual promiscuousness.

I still have not seen that show - I have been looking for something to watch, i might try it!

I think that despite our reasonable fear, 2024 will be when most of us begin to observe the inability of overlords to maintain their wealth and power - and that is the reason we see so many overlords preparing bunkers.  Decentralization simply obviates centralized control.  Overlords are that control mechanism that used to be necessary to economic growth, coordinating collective labor and pooling capital for massive industrial production.  Neither are necessary anymore.  Both are actual impediments to production.  We see that massive windfarms are economically non-competitive, because wind generators are useful where the small draws are, to pump water on farms, or generate power at remote sites where it's not economically superable to run lines from the grid to the site.  The extraordinary engineering necessary to massive megawatt windmills is extraordinarily difficult and expensive, which renders them economically insuperable.  I learned how to make a windmill back in the 1970s using a Pinto rear end, the generator of it's engine, and some planks, no engineering necessary.

This is the reality of decentralized production.  Freedom is the elimination of overlords, and overlords are extraneous and detrimental to economic production with decentralized tooling.  It is actually unimaginable to see overlords maintaining their wealth and power in a decentralized world.  Evolution naturally eliminates extraneous and counterproductive elements from ecosystems, and whether we're talking about nutrient flows in a swamp or politics and money, eliminating unnecessary expenses is what evolution does.  I think this is the year when it become unavoidably obvious that sybarites jet-setting around are the carbon that needs to be reduced, and simply not feeding them is beneficial and profitable to their hosts.  To maintain their wealth and power they are dependent on projecting force, using armies to persuade laborers to pay them a portion of their production.

Drones today are proving the most powerful weapons systems on battlefields, from the Ukraine to the Red Sea, and rather than $B tanks and fleets of warplanes, or carriers and their supporting fleets, a swarm of drones that cost a few grand are able to disable and destroy those wunderwaffen and eliminate their utility on the battlefield.  Decentralization utterly outcompetes centralization on the battlefield, in industry, and at every level and scale economically.  The present wars and conflicts are making this unavoidably obvious.  The Houthis control the Red Sea and Saudi oil production, because they can eliminate refinery production with cheap drones, and shipping through the Red Sea with the same cheap drones.  $T carriers and refineries are unable to be defended from swarms of drones, and $B cruise missiles are simple incapable of destroying decentralized production of cheap drones across the landscape.  Those weapons are good for destroying $B factories for cruise missiles, not distributed workshops spitting out cheap drones.

At every scale, in every industry, decentralization outcompetes centralization.  Overlords are obsolete, and now is the moment when this becomes absolutely obvious to everyone in the world.