![cuddle_naughty.png](https://images.hive.blog/DQmQW7QHV6XwCtsxYaq4fV1HHxJCa7qVfzFX1crbvvXzudr/cuddle_naughty.png)

Was just thinking about this when you did the Daily Mail highlight, in regards to that Cleveland Clinic Study it said that the vaccine switch up the lgG3 & lgG4 somewhat after the second vaccination, definitely after a third and with each subsequent covid infection afterwards.  Given at this point they can't go back, obviously because the people are dead, and tell whether those subsequent switches started occurring after infections all along.  They can do that now, probably something they should look for, people who get covid for a first time stepping forward in a study to this effect, yet though the variants are milder, or so we are being told, it could just be the switch doing it...but it'd be interesting to find out just based on infections of those who aren't vaccinated.  If what some continue to argue that it doesn't matter about the vaccines because you can still have heart problems after catching the virus so you are better protected getting the vaccine (which I'd argue only enhances  the chance but that's me) so if them arguing in that regard why couldn't the switch of the immune system also be happening before vaccination.  My opinion would be, considering the bioweaponry question, is that both covid and the vaccines are geared toward the same result(s).  

That was funny how she tilted backwards coming on stage with all that stuff loaded on her.  "She'll be on the moon"...reminds me of watching dbroze video the other day on Can Elon Musk be Trusted with guest speakers of which one of them was saying people aren't going to the moon like Elon projects it, they'll be transformed into a virtual world (possibly via a chip someday) that has them living on the moon but they won't actually be going to the moon.  You are always good at relating the messages being sent, seems to apply heavily here with what one guy in the video was discussing.  The message is "she'll be going to the moon" but she will actually never be going to the moon.  Interesting aspects to the discussion they had, the guy off to the top left made the connect like I did about Charles Leibers, he didn't say it but Malone was just a patsy.

Sam Harris - "What if the vaccines really did prevent transmission?" 

Sam has just pointed out that the jabs don't prevent transmission.  

Truer words were ne'er spoke. 

Steve Kirsch has recently published regarding the evidence that the jabs cause heart damage.  A study in Thailand of children jabbed showed that ~30% of them had cardiac issues after being jabbed.  The FAA (Federal Aviation Administration, the US aviation industry regulator) in October last year hugely relaxed the cardiac medical standards for pilots by at least half, which shows the jabs have horribly harmed up to 50M Americans' hearts, and have increased strokes by 10x according to the CDC's own data. He's shown that Pfizer knew these things after the first month of the rollout from their data they collected on adverse events.  There is no indemnification from liability for fraud.  No just court will enforce a contract based on fraudulent misrepresentations.  Pfizer has no immunity from tort damages for the deliberate harm they've inflicted because they lied when making claims about their product, which invalidates their indemnification by the USG.

That's in just courts, mind.  Dunno where you could find one of those, but there aren't any in America. 

Steve has also sought any nursing home that shows all cause mortality dropped after the jabs were introduced, without finding one.  He has offered to bet $1M that the jabs caused 20% of the jabbed heart problems, and for all sorts of similar metrics, but no one has taken him up on any of them.  Apparently no one has any confidence the jabs haven't done exactly what Steve says they've done, at least not enough to put their money where their mouths are.

What if Sam had been on the right side of history all along?  Wouldn't that be something!

You know what's funny about the paid shills for Pfizer?  Literally no one whom I paid any attention to took the money.  Apparently the folks I consider good sources of information don't shill for money.  Not you, not James Corbett, nobody whose content I follow.  Also, wasn't Pink's first big hit something along the lines of 'Save me from me'?  Not particularly a recommendation for a thought leader IMHO.

I sure wish I could pick partners as well as I seemed to have picked pundits, LOL.

Thanks!