Hope you don't mind me chiming in...

Having no minimum wage does not lower the pay of all the wage earners in general. Sure, it might if you were making artificially high wages propped up by regulation. Eliminating the minimum wage would allow for new job creation at lower rates that wouldn't have been possible before. These lower wages wouldn't be intended to be lived on. It'd just be a temporary rate to build up experience.

Perhaps a store owner would like to have a door greeter, but they don't think it's cost effective at a hypothetical minimum wage of $10/hr. However, they would be willing to pay $6/hr for someone with no experience. This job would never be created with the minimum wage. But without it, someone with no skills or experience could voluntarily work for that pay. It'd definitely be better than no job at all.

Why do you think it's so hard to pull yourself out of homelessness? When you're in that state, many businesses may not want to take the risk to hire you. You may have to prove you're reliable and a good worker before you can make a higher wage. You would be more likely to be able to do this without a minimum wage.

It wouldn't be likely that people would be working for near $0/hr. The business and the worker agree on a wage voluntarily. There is no coercion. And with no minimum wage, there would be *more* job opportunities, which means you have more of a choice to ignore the lower paying positions and look for higher paying ones. And again, this doesn't mean that if you currently work at fast food at $11/hr that you'll be dropped down to $2/hr just because there is no longer a limitation. They pay you for what value your job creates, and competition in the market promotes a tendency for wages to rise (depending on the supply and demand for that type of job of course). 

The law of demand explains how the minimum wage affects the unemployment rate. All other things equal, when you raise the price of something (i.e. cost of labor), less of it will be purchased.

I took you saying "freemarket" to mean anarchist society, my mistake.

> Actually I think governments can do a lot of good things (and yes, they do a lot of not so good things).

I agree with you, government can use the money it steals to do good. However, that doesn't legitimize the theft.

https://s3.postimg.io/cdblepg4j/Ends_Justifiesthe_Means_Mentality.png

> A hyper efficient and totally frictionless market, as your kind believes in, generates, especially now that a lot of labor becomes obsolete (due to automation and computers), some problems. A lot of jobs in such a society won't pay enough for the workers to (literally) survive. In your totally libertarian society, those people would starve until enough of them died to bring the market back to a stable equilibrium. I'm sorry, but in my opinion, this is just wrong.

That's a baseless claim. What is the reasoning and evidence?

> This is bullshit.

Again, what exactly did I write that was bullshit?