im gonna do these on 3speak instead of dtube so i dont catch anti heimin downvees

if u just paid to get on tv news or cnbc in a debate

we should pay people from other chains for debates against our top voter hive debate club champion 

and why dont we do what @jerrybanfield did and buy a bunch of facebook ads with your posting rewards to prove it can be done and perhaps make you a profit as people upvote your facebook marketing ad post updates ...jerry did it well we could all upvite your campaign

ALSO TWITTER now you dan buy twitter blue pay for your tweets you already get a lot of action on to be promoted to a lot more people and post results in hive to get upvoted amd keep it going 

i may want to actually do this myself starting with a $10 twitter blue ad or ill ask @hiveio @hiveblocks twitter account to start and well make some nice animted gif posts like the cleanest ads for hive so far

### Hive: A Censorship-Resistant Oasis in the Digital Landscape

In this unfiltered discussion, TheyCallMeDan shares his insights on the current state of the crypto market and the critical importance of censorship resistance. As a long-time Hive supporter, he passionately advocates for the platform's ability to provide the necessary safeguards against the growing centralization and political polarization plaguing the digital world.

### The Inevitability of Censorship Resistance

Dan emphasizes that in our increasingly digital society, the need for censorship-resistant solutions is not a matter of preference, but a necessity. He argues that as more aspects of our lives move online, the ability to freely transact and communicate without interference will become a fundamental right, akin to a tiger's right to hunt or a squirrel's right to store nuts. Failing to provide this freedom would be a failure of our species.

### The Shortcomings of Centralized Protocols

Dan is highly critical of protocols that prioritize features like speed and low fees over true decentralization and censorship resistance. He points to the recent statistic that 95% of crypto wallets are custodial, highlighting the alarming trend towards centralization. He dismisses the notion of "bring your own node" as a viable solution, stating that there is no evidence of such an approach succeeding in a decentralized, censorship-resistant manner.

### The Promise of Hive

In contrast, Dan sees Hive as the best solution available for preserving freedom of speech and value transfer. He acknowledges that Hive is not perfect, but argues that it is the most technically sound and sustainable platform for building a censorship-resistant future. He believes that as more people understand Hive's unique architecture and incentive structures, its value proposition will become increasingly clear, even to those not previously involved in crypto.

### A Call to Action

Dan passionately urges his audience to become obsessed with the importance of censorship resistance, stating that this should be the top priority for anyone concerned about the future. He criticizes those who passively hope for someone else to solve the problem, arguing that this mindset is what has led to the current predicament. Instead, he calls for a proactive, community-driven approach to building and defending the decentralized infrastructure necessary to safeguard individual freedoms.

Overall, this episode showcases Dan's unwavering commitment to the principles of censorship resistance and his belief in Hive's ability to lead the charge in this critical battle for the future of the digital landscape.

---

*Notice: This is an AI-generated summary based on a transcript of the video. The summarization of the videos in this channel was requested/approved by the channel owner.*

![image.png](https://files.peakd.com/file/peakd-hive/antisocialist/23swdzzQN7nvopjrtSSBc6uaFBTm7p14ixkez5AJPeqdRoySwF2jywHn8q4mdNUsz5E4t.png)

There's a prevalent issue in the industry where several protocols claim to be decentralized despite still having centralized elements at their core. Personally, I am an advocate of decentralized protocols and centralized applications built upon them -  the level of centralization is dependent on what people want. 

The primary reason behind this preference is that most individuals may not feel entirely comfortable with the responsibility of managing their data, and centralized apps tend to offer faster and more organized services. However, it is ultimately up to the users to decide which approach best aligns with their needs and values.

Additionally, not all applications necessarily require blockchain technology. There may be instances where people prefer to engage in casual conversations or exchange temporary messages, which they may delete later. In the context of social media, permanent message storage may not always be desirable.

We're building a startup and are at some point planning to accept HBD / HIVE as means of payment. Although our target audience isn't necessarily tech-savvy and has no interest in crypto we will give some discounts for those that use it and try to stimulate its usage.