Honestly, I'm just very satisfied with my wife and I have no interest in seeing porn, regardless of how soft-core it may be. Also, I'd love Steemit to be a way people can get started on a prosperous financial future early on, but until there is some way to disable or "unsub" from certain content, my kids will be nowhere near the site.

I did browse around today and find a Firefox extension to disable all images so at least I can browse around without seeing anything. I posted about the extension [here](https://steemit.com/steemit/@robsteady/tired-of-inappropriate-images-showing-up-using-firefox-install-this-extension) this morning. I'll gladly take an upvote if that's useful for you.

http://thevitalounge.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/SHH.jpg
### There should be an optional setting to allow or hide #NSFW content. Let's face it, like @drinkzya said, 
>##### *"I'd totally prefer not to see a thumbnail of somebody's privates while I am at work."*

### And I totally agree. Work, or at home, it should be optional to opt out these posts. Relatably, I hope there are ways to filter out specific keywords as Steemit develops...the anoynmous world can be ugly. 

### As far as a method or suggestion to work with NSFW content, I think adding an optional setting to opt out would be appropriate, and any content deemed *#NSFW* should be flagged down for this reason, and after so many votes,the post can be penalized by hiding the thumbnail. I feel this would be fair, as we are not removing the post itself. 

### I would also suggest that enough upvotes are to negate the flags; build an algorithm that determines at a ratio when to waive the flag's penalty. If someone's account is flagged enough from multiple posts, there should be punishment to that account. A possible punishment idea would to suspend the account for X amount of minutes, or temporarily disable their ability to flag after a rapid number over a short period of time. 

### **However**, this could cause **united attacks on posts**, which may cause harm, but we should be allowed to view who flagged the specific content. If that person is notorious for flagging for false reasons, that person should be penalized per some sort of **Terms of Service *causing grief***.

### As @bendjmiller222  mentioned,
>### There should be a flag for content posted in the wrong section and one for spam type content and one when you feel the user has copied or plagiarized. And yes the second part of that should be true as you've said to prevent people from falsely using the alert/flag system.

### And lastly, if the option to enable multiple flag (per reason), this may help prevent bot's flagging without valid reason to try to create difficulty to crawls the server/post requests.

### If NSFW does not have a way to be filtered, I personally feel it could interrupt the continued growth of Steemit. We all want it to be successfully ran, and not full of bots that post pornographic material and upvote each other.

## I hope I'm not the only one who feels this way, and I do hope this all makes as much sense to you as it did in my head. 

# Anyone else have any suggestions?