I think getting rid of the time limit you can upvote a post would help steem increase in quality tremendously.
author | tosch |
---|---|
permlink | stop-the-steem-post-upvote-time-limit |
category | blockchain |
json_metadata | {"tags":["blockchain","steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1","format":"markdown"} |
created | 2019-02-21 23:30:00 |
last_update | 2019-02-21 23:30:00 |
depth | 0 |
children | 3 |
last_payout | 2019-02-28 23:30:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.836 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.082 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 110 |
author_reputation | 3,148,075,991,236 |
root_title | "Stop the steem post upvote time limit" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 80,214,706 |
net_rshares | 2,057,911,350,401 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
tosch | 0 | 1,693,548,267,948 | 100% | ||
aboutblank | 0 | 17,761,694,820 | 97.59% | ||
mattclarke | 0 | 222,429,746,746 | 20% | ||
oecd | 0 | 15,925,652,953 | 97.59% | ||
merlin | 0 | 50,095,480,060 | 97.59% | ||
elviento | 0 | 468,870,941 | 0.65% | ||
dynamicrypto | 0 | 2,188,785,275 | 5% | ||
geco | 0 | 227,190,019 | 100% | ||
berlinmusic | 0 | 8,040,097,646 | 97.59% | ||
hermopolis | 0 | 1,666,978,500 | 97.59% | ||
artchan | 0 | 18,039,724,157 | 97.59% | ||
xmusic | 0 | 19,191,384,914 | 97.59% | ||
upvote.bot | 0 | 8,033,060,352 | 97.59% | ||
dariel20 | 0 | 294,416,070 | 100% |
But then all of your posts have to compete with every other post that's ever been written. Going back 3 years so far. I wrote about it a while ago, here. https://steempeak.com/steemit/@mattclarke/scratching-the-7-day-itch-or-how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-and-love-the-short-payout-window
author | mattclarke |
---|---|
permlink | re-tosch-stop-the-steem-post-upvote-time-limit-20190222t003736250z |
category | blockchain |
json_metadata | {"tags":["blockchain"],"community":"steempeak","app":"steempeak/1.7.2b"} |
created | 2019-02-22 00:37:30 |
last_update | 2019-02-22 00:37:30 |
depth | 1 |
children | 2 |
last_payout | 2019-03-01 00:37:30 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.134 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.036 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 291 |
author_reputation | 128,228,979,746,445 |
root_title | "Stop the steem post upvote time limit" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 80,216,586 |
net_rshares | 328,821,320,495 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
tosch | 0 | 328,821,320,495 | 20% |
Yes, wouldn't that increase the quality? Especially on Blogs, some posts might need some weeks to really grab attention and surge. If a topic somebody has written 1 year ago all of the sudden gets trendy again. That would be a market at work in my opinion and reward authors better for their input. Eventually, competing against older written posts should not be a problem.
author | tosch |
---|---|
permlink | re-mattclarke-re-tosch-stop-the-steem-post-upvote-time-limit-20190222t004917087z |
category | blockchain |
json_metadata | {"tags":["blockchain"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2019-02-22 00:49:18 |
last_update | 2019-02-22 00:49:30 |
depth | 2 |
children | 1 |
last_payout | 2019-03-01 00:49:18 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.090 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.022 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 376 |
author_reputation | 3,148,075,991,236 |
root_title | "Stop the steem post upvote time limit" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 80,216,900 |
net_rshares | 221,744,332,142 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
mattclarke | 0 | 221,744,332,142 | 20% |
If somebody new read the old post I just linked to and resteemed it; and some of his followers did the same, I'd be delighted. People can still reply to it and share it. They can follow me. I can reply to their reply, and they can upvote my response; there's a heap of ways older posts can benefit an author. I did a post 'Sudoku without Numbers'. Its 2 years old and its on the first page of the google search results. That's fantastic, and plenty of reason to pour effort into a post. That may not translate as **quality**, which is fairly subjective; but its justification to give it a red-hot :)
author | mattclarke |
---|---|
permlink | re-tosch-re-mattclarke-re-tosch-stop-the-steem-post-upvote-time-limit-20190222t010651893z |
category | blockchain |
json_metadata | {"tags":["blockchain"],"community":"steempeak","app":"steempeak/1.7.2b"} |
created | 2019-02-22 01:06:48 |
last_update | 2019-02-22 01:06:48 |
depth | 3 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2019-03-01 01:06:48 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.134 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.037 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 601 |
author_reputation | 128,228,979,746,445 |
root_title | "Stop the steem post upvote time limit" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 80,217,335 |
net_rshares | 328,922,339,769 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
tosch | 0 | 328,922,339,769 | 20% |