<center>

[![](https://img.3speakcontent.co/xqrlcngp/thumbnails/default.png)](https://3speak.tv/watch?v=ura-soul/xqrlcngp)

▶️ [Watch on 3Speak](https://3speak.tv/watch?v=ura-soul/xqrlcngp)

</center>

---

***The [Canadian Covid Care Alliance](https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/) is an 'alliance of independent Canadian doctors, scientists and health care practitioners is committed to providing top-quality and balanced evidence-based information to the Canadian public about COVID-19 so that hospitalizations can be reduced, lives saved, and our country safely restored as quickly as possible.'***

Here they educate on key issues relating to informed consent when administering or receiving a medication or vaccine. In general, it is a legal requirement that patients provide 'informed consent' when receiving a medical intervention or vaccine - this means that the patient must be fully aware of risk and benefits, plus also agree to receive the intervention voluntarily.

The video highlights the difference between Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) and Absolutre Risk Reduction (ARR), highlighting the way that RRR is being used to give the impression that the vaccines (and other drugs) are drastically more potent than they are. The FDA recommends that risk reductions be presented using ARR but yet it is almost always RRR that is quoted in media and manufacturer comments about the shots.

Relative Risk Reduction refers to how much lower the chance is that you will develop COVID19 as compared to if you didn't have the shot (on average). This was quoted at around 95% for the Pfizer shot - although this figure itself was a massaging of the numbers and in reality it is probably closer to 50%). This sounds like an impressively big benefit.

Absolute Risk Reduction refers to the overall reduction in chance that you will develop COVID19, taking into consideration the total risk of developing COVID19 across the whole population. So ARR lets you understand how much the chances of you developing COVID19 have been reduced in totality, taking into consideration the actual chances of you developing COVID19 - rather than only in the context of a comparison to those that don't.

ARR gives real world context with a meaningful scale, wheras RRR describes potential gains as a percentage, but without the real world context of scale.

The ARR of Pfizer's shots is 0.84% (using the ARR of 95%). This is due to low chances of developing COVID19, with or without a shot.

The RRR sounds impressively large, whereas the ARR sounds very small and it is known that this confuses people into perceiving the benefit to be higher than it is. This is important when assessing the potential risk reduction in contrast to the potential increase in risk due to adverse reaction and injury caused by the shots.

Adverse events must be stated to recipients in order for informed consent to be possible. This is generally not occurring.

Alternative treatments must be explained, but this is not being done and in fact, the FDA and others are actively involved in hiding alternative therapies.

Coercion cannot be present if informed consent is to be possible. Many people are feeling coerced and even threatened by governments and employers. In some cases employers are docking payslips and in Australia we have just learned that the state of Victoria will be WITHDRAWING HEALTHCARE from those who do not receive this shots! This literally means that the state is choosing to kill people who may be sick with totally unrelated health conditions if the person does not want to receive the shot!

This is an almost unprecedented breach of medical ethics and makes informed consent impossible. 

Wishing you well,
Ura Soul

---

▶️ [3Speak](https://3speak.tv/watch?v=ura-soul/xqrlcngp)