>"In the human brain, the information that we create and calculate is not always correct. We make mistakes over and over again. But the machines don’t make mistakes like that."

Then we will always be superior to our tools, because we will make mistakes we learn from.  Once I made a mistake and cut my thumb on a broken shell.  As undesirable as that may have seemed, it has become the reason I do not suffer from pain as I would had I not cut my thumb.  Pain is just input.  Suffering is a choice.

One interesting feature of our minds is that we can choose what they are, what we perceive, and whether we are happy or not.  It is not what happens to us that makes us happy.  It is not what happens to us that makes us suffer.  We choose those things.

Every good thing you are is something you have learned to be from making a mistake you did not intend to make, and no one would have programmed you to make.  It is our weaknesses that most strengthen us, and how much so is unquantifiable.  

It is a qualitative difference between us and machines, and that isn't just a matter of more qubits.  

Also, I'm not talking about one protein.  I'm talking about the dance of them that results in our actions.  That complexity is absolutely as simple as possible, with all extraneous crap shaved from the bone during ~4Byr or evolution.  That degree of complexity is utterly beyond our present conception, and that must precede our improvement over that general utility in the engineering of an AI that can improve on it's performance.