CBDCs are rolling out around the world.  The banks that are rolling them out ultimately are owned by investors that also own most of everything else, including the physical infrastructure of the internet, upon which cryptos utterly depend.  The purposes of the CBDCs can only be fulfilled if they are practically universally adopted, and cryptocurrencies directly oppose that adoption.

It is facile for owners of the internet to censor cryptos, and since they need to prevent alternatives to CBDCs, it is predictable that cryptos will be censored.  It is great that the understanding of governance has progressed to the point you have herein related, but the resistance to censorship you have considered neglects physical dependence on infrastructure, and the ease with which owners of that physical infrastructure can simply refuse to transmit encrypted data unless they are availed the keys to that data.

Not your keys, not your coins.

What resistance to that censorship is possible?  The only potential for cryptos to resist it is to not be dependent on physical infrastructure they don't own, as far as I can tell.

Thanks!