create account

Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal by vempromundo

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com
· @vempromundo · (edited)
$6.51
Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal
<div class=text-justify>

Draft because I will bring this topic only as a debate. I'm using the LEO tag also because it's something that affects the tribe's economy, so I believe it fits the theme, since I'm going to address the POB theme, but it can be used in other tribes as well, modifying the values ​​here presented.

As this is a draft, nothing here is definitive, and everything can be changed according to the comments, leaving the idea started crossed out and the new writing.

<center><h2>Maximum reward</h2></center>

I want to treat the topic maximum reward as a value as being the ceiling for a publication to be of value.

<h3>"What do you mean? Do you want to impose how much a publication can or cannot receive?"</h3>

No. I think more of a figurative value that the community understands as a "spending ceiling".

Since currency issuance causes inflation (a priori, obviously there are many other factors), trying to reduce its issuance may be something to combat this problem.

<h3>"So if you don't have to, what good is it?"</h3>

Let's go to practical examples, as this makes viewing easier.

The value has to be something that doesn't affect content creators too much so as not to discourage them from continuing, but neither does its implementation make a difference.

In POB I see this value as 200 POB.

<center>https://cdn.dol.com.br/img/Artigo-Destaque/600000/vira-lata_00600786_0_.jpg?xid=1334315</center>

~~Very few publications manage to exceed this value, and when they do, they don't go much further. What I believe that this cut would not make so much difference to the author, thus not discouraging him to continue writing.~~

I thought it was a small portion of publications that reached above 200 POB, but @onealfa.pob brought the following image in the comments, showing that there is a small group that is always above this ceiling

Click on image to check in larger size

<center>https://images.hive.blog/DQmca9E2gqTyT1HsAdV8JuhSkVjvojBMjAw57FLoMRC2JF9/top2authors.jpg</center>

<h3>"But if it's not going to impose a limit, how would it be resolved?"</h3>

I can see in two ways.

One of them is the curation look. As a curator, when I see a publication that has already reached this value, I don't vote for it, and I try to spread my vote for other posts, thus diversifying the authors that will be part of the pool.

The other is positive Downvote. When seeing that a post exceeded this value, people could perform a Downvote so that it goes back to 200 giving a functionality for the Downvote that does not generate hate or retaliation.

Obviously this value of 200 could be replaced by any other value you find better in the comments.

<h3>I would like to know your opinion about this idea. Obviously I could be 100% wrong and arguments will come in the comments that might change my mind, but at the moment I feel this is a good draft proposal that could be proposed.</h3>

</div>



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@vempromundo/maximum-reward-a-draft-of-a-proposal)</sub></center>
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and 110 others
properties (23)
authorvempromundo
permlinkmaximum-reward-a-draft-of-a-proposal
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain","leofinance","neoxian","broadhive","ctp","cent","hive","ash","hustler"],"image":["https://cdn.dol.com.br/img/Artigo-Destaque/600000/vira-lata_00600786_0_.jpg?xid=1334315","https://images.hive.blog/DQmca9E2gqTyT1HsAdV8JuhSkVjvojBMjAw57FLoMRC2JF9/top2authors.jpg"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","format":"markdown","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@vempromundo/maximum-reward-a-draft-of-a-proposal","users":["onealfa.pob"],"links":["https://www.proofofbrain.io/@vempromundo/maximum-reward-a-draft-of-a-proposal"]}
created2021-07-19 08:48:33
last_update2021-07-20 03:32:03
depth0
children79
last_payout2021-07-26 08:48:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value3.264 HBD
curator_payout_value3.248 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length3,070
author_reputation170,354,435,472,572
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,008,139
net_rshares13,633,252,247,481
author_curate_reward""
vote details (174)
@aiovo ·
it is an interesting idea I liked it and vote for it



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@aiovo/qwnlnj)</sub></center>
properties (22)
authoraiovo
permlinkqwnlnj
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@aiovo/qwnlnj"}
created2021-07-22 15:59:30
last_update2021-07-22 15:59:30
depth1
children0
last_payout2021-07-29 15:59:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length160
author_reputation15,911,295,900,579
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,067,000
net_rshares0
@allcapsonezero ·
200 is nice to get.  I usually get less (but sometimes get more).  It wouldn't bother me any if this was imposed, but I am not one to want to mess with the way things are.  That said, if it becomes part of the culture I am quite alright with it... and I tend to vote that way already (but at 300).  

My own personal opinion is to let the coins fall where the stake decides to put it... I also think your idea is not a bad one and I encourage you to run with it and see where it goes.



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@allcapsonezero/qwis1e)</sub></center>
πŸ‘  , , ,
properties (23)
authorallcapsonezero
permlinkqwis1e
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@allcapsonezero/qwis1e"}
created2021-07-20 01:27:15
last_update2021-07-20 01:27:15
depth1
children2
last_payout2021-07-27 01:27:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length601
author_reputation21,414,368,432,795
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,021,494
net_rshares9,874,338,154
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@vempromundo ·
It's a topic that I brought up for debate, I don't know how it would be adhered to, I'm lately thinking about several situations to bring to the debate



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@vempromundo/qwixll)</sub></center>
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authorvempromundo
permlinkqwixll
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@vempromundo/qwixll"}
created2021-07-20 03:27:21
last_update2021-07-20 03:27:21
depth2
children1
last_payout2021-07-27 03:27:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length265
author_reputation170,354,435,472,572
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,022,822
net_rshares11,554,384,176
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@allcapsonezero ·
It is a good discussion to have.  Well done.



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@allcapsonezero/qwkobm)</sub></center>
properties (22)
authorallcapsonezero
permlinkqwkobm
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@allcapsonezero/qwkobm"}
created2021-07-21 02:02:12
last_update2021-07-21 02:02:12
depth3
children0
last_payout2021-07-28 02:02:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length161
author_reputation21,414,368,432,795
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,039,613
net_rshares0
@calumam ·
Interesting proposal idea. We're definitely seeing a 150-200 POB baseline for the higher end posts at the moment, but that too will drop over time as more tokens are realised into the community. This highlights the need for some form of scaling basis if the limit was taken on board. 

We're always going to fall into pitfalls if we look back at reward allocation from the past and compare it to the present (I recall yourself and madstacks having large rewards in the early days quite frequently and fortunately you're still around in the community), although it is important for us to weigh up multiple factors if we are going to judge based on post rewards alone.

Discussion about over-rewarded posts and what constitutes that is a good step forward. I think this was needed prior to @trostparadox's proposal about downvoting because it was an unanswered question that left some uncertainty in the air.



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@calumam/qwjenm)</sub></center>
properties (22)
authorcalumam
permlinkqwjenm
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"users":["trostparadox"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@calumam/qwjenm"}
created2021-07-20 09:35:45
last_update2021-07-20 09:35:45
depth1
children0
last_payout2021-07-27 09:35:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,016
author_reputation21,805,435,583,895
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,026,814
net_rshares0
@edystringz ·
$0.04
You guys should make me understand why one content cannot have more than 200POB 

I mean those who vote see it deserving, don't they? 

Most of us don't vote based on rewards, we vote posts we have read and found it valuable 

Also, I thought, the reason most posts gets more than enough votes is so that it can trend for more views on that particular post, probably, because of the message embedded in the article... I'm I wrong?



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@edystringz/qwhqr4)</sub></center>
πŸ‘  , , ,
properties (23)
authoredystringz
permlinkqwhqr4
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@edystringz/qwhqr4"}
created2021-07-19 12:02:09
last_update2021-07-19 12:02:09
depth1
children5
last_payout2021-07-26 12:02:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.018 HBD
curator_payout_value0.019 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length543
author_reputation64,596,476,494,498
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,010,071
net_rshares82,410,150,180
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@onealfa.pob ·
>I mean those who vote see it deserving, don't they?

# Wrong!
Because so many voting don't see that post at all ! Never!
Because  the UV's  goes out automatic,  in whale's autovoting bots.


If you look closer, you will find  that 90% of the low end upvoters brings only ~5% of the total reward.
At the same time 3-4 top whales bring 90-95% of all those massive rewards
And Most of that - in the autovoting mode, without even seing or reading the post. 

Is this so hard to see and understand ??? 
Do you even know how and where to look, to find out how much and by whom each upvote has contributed?



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@onealfa.pob/qwhrad)</sub></center>
πŸ‘  , , ,
properties (23)
authoronealfa.pob
permlinkqwhrad
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@onealfa.pob/qwhrad"}
created2021-07-19 12:13:27
last_update2021-07-19 12:13:27
depth2
children4
last_payout2021-07-26 12:13:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length714
author_reputation2,310,476,671,678
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,010,198
net_rshares7,604,438,076
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@edystringz ·
Oh I understand that not everyone reads around here 

And that most authors get rewarded by bots 

Now, because of the privileges of being upvotes by the bots, some authors reduce their efforts to create deserving posts 

They just churn out whatever they like, knowing that the bots will always serve them their rewards 

For this folks, I think they deserve a DV 

However, if there is an author who puts in the desire effort to come up with creative, educating, and thought-provoking articles, I think, he or she should be allowed to have his or her rewards even if its more than 200POB



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@edystringz/qwhs1a)</sub></center>
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
authoredystringz
permlinkqwhs1a
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@edystringz/qwhs1a"}
created2021-07-19 12:29:48
last_update2021-07-19 12:29:48
depth3
children0
last_payout2021-07-26 12:29:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length702
author_reputation64,596,476,494,498
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,010,414
net_rshares9,678,140,124
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@heruvim1978 ·
question, where do I check if I want to see who one use votes and curate for one week or month interval? is that even possible in hive?



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@heruvim1978/qwi9hm)</sub></center>
properties (22)
authorheruvim1978
permlinkqwi9hm
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@heruvim1978/qwi9hm"}
created2021-07-19 18:46:33
last_update2021-07-19 18:46:33
depth3
children0
last_payout2021-07-26 18:46:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length249
author_reputation142,356,294,881,973
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries
0.
accounthiveonboard
weight100
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,016,311
net_rshares0
@nikkybabe ·
Please try and check out my opinion below @onealfa.pob



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@nikkybabe/qwijkg)</sub></center>
properties (22)
authornikkybabe
permlinkqwijkg
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"users":["onealfa.pob"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@nikkybabe/qwijkg"}
created2021-07-19 22:24:18
last_update2021-07-19 22:24:18
depth3
children0
last_payout2021-07-26 22:24:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length166
author_reputation68,849,649,066
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries
0.
accounthiveonboard
weight100
1.
accounttipu
weight100
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,019,434
net_rshares0
@scholaris.pob · (edited)
Still?  I thought we were supposed to stop autovoting?

>Is this so hard to see and understand ???
Do you even know how and where to look, to find out how much and by whom each upvote has contributed?

Yes, it is hard to see but not hard to understand.  

It is difficult to easily see quickly how and when each person votes and how much they contribute without using queries.  Speaking for many, we don't know.  



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@scholaris.pob/qwiyhw)</sub></center>
properties (22)
authorscholaris.pob
permlinkqwiyhw
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@scholaris.pob/qwiyhw","links":["https://www.proofofbrain.io/@scholaris.pob/qwiyhw"]}
created2021-07-20 03:46:45
last_update2021-07-20 04:09:06
depth3
children0
last_payout2021-07-27 03:46:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length529
author_reputation3,074,855,239,378
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,023,013
net_rshares0
@friendlymoose ·
I think it's a good idea to set a max on rewards. It's fair to get rewards based on content, not on the number of followers or people that upvote you.  

I also think it would be better when this will be handled technically instead of by the community via downvotes or better vote distribution. Stimulating better vote distribution is good, but won't solve the problem because of autovoting and voting trails. Downvoting when it is a quality post doesn't feel very well.    

Isn't there a way to technically implement a ceiling?



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@friendlymoose/qwl370)</sub></center>
properties (22)
authorfriendlymoose
permlinkqwl370
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@friendlymoose/qwl370"}
created2021-07-21 07:23:24
last_update2021-07-21 07:23:24
depth1
children0
last_payout2021-07-28 07:23:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length645
author_reputation411,966,590,146,520
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,043,059
net_rshares0
@heruvim1978 · (edited)
$0.42
The thing is, people will always find a way to go around. You put 200 per post, they will write 2 posts per day, and still get the 400 they got now for a post. We need a better, more elegant solution. And not to forget, most of us are here for the money, and few of us are here for the fun and community.

Maybe a limit per user, from the other user curation, let's say monthly or weekly. like no more than X where X it is an acceptable majority voted value. 

Maybe a limit per user, from the other user curation, let's say monthly or weekly. like no more than X where X it is an acceptable majority voted value. 



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@heruvim1978/qwi9bt)</sub></center>
πŸ‘  , , , ,
properties (23)
authorheruvim1978
permlinkqwi9bt
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@heruvim1978/qwi9bt","links":["https://www.proofofbrain.io/@heruvim1978/qwi9bt"]}
created2021-07-19 18:43:03
last_update2021-07-19 18:44:48
depth1
children0
last_payout2021-07-26 18:43:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.208 HBD
curator_payout_value0.209 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length728
author_reputation142,356,294,881,973
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries
0.
accounthiveonboard
weight100
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,016,277
net_rshares871,088,096,170
author_curate_reward""
vote details (5)
@hranhuk ·
Although I understand your idea, I don't like the Downvote part.

I also don't see a problem if a publication goes above 300 POB or more. If she deserved it and was truly worthy. Someone will not always win this.

So limiting how much a person earns is boring and I would be discouraged from continuing to write as they put a limit. And remembering that POB along with VIBES are one of the few tribes that few tokens have in circulation from large and well-known communities...

Taking advantage of the fact that @onealfa.pob is in the comments would be something contrary to the maximum vote he gives, for example, in LEO and which does not repeat more than 1x per month for the same user.

So writing, studying and putting together a nice post to be limited? This is boring.

Now I agree with the issue of many other posts being above this limit equal to the same @onealfa.pob posted. And simply when the content is very generic or being favored always the same... Unfortunately this happens.


That's why a few days ago I put up this proposal for curating posts that bring some kind of involvement and contest to the POB and that it's like a real POB. [HERE](https://www.proofofbrain.io/hive-150329/@hranhuk/how-pob-encouraged-me-to-continue-writing-my-book).

As for the price, it is the market trend. The POB just adjusted its values ​​that before were mere speculation. As long as there is a lack of real projects and causes for the tribe, we will not see values ​​as high as before. Only if a whale decides to take an interest as it used to. But it will be soon.



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@hranhuk/qwi1vk)</sub></center>
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
authorhranhuk
permlinkqwi1vk
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"users":["onealfa.pob"],"links":["https://www.proofofbrain.io/hive-150329/@hranhuk/how-pob-encouraged-me-to-continue-writing-my-book"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@hranhuk/qwi1vk"}
created2021-07-19 16:02:36
last_update2021-07-19 16:02:36
depth1
children0
last_payout2021-07-26 16:02:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,679
author_reputation39,970,137,642,702
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,013,827
net_rshares3,618,044,589
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@leprechaun ·
We are in the early days of POB, and our annual inflation over the year coming will be in the hundreds of percent!  This is the journey BTC took.  Although percentage wise Inflation is reducing, absolute inflation will be constant until the first halvening.

I don't think it should be up to us to limit the amount an author gets.  It smacks  of income limiting.  Is the post worth my vote or and how much of it?  That is where my thought process ends.  It wont bother me whether you get more than $30 for this post.

πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
authorleprechaun
permlinkre-vempromundo-2021719t154540252z
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain","leofinance","neoxian","broadhive","ctp","cent","hive","ash","hustler","archon"],"app":"ecency/3.0.16-vision","format":"markdown+html"}
created2021-07-19 18:45:42
last_update2021-07-19 18:45:42
depth1
children0
last_payout2021-07-26 18:45:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length518
author_reputation43,025,812,810,398
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,016,305
net_rshares5,976,994,574
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@melbourneswest ·
I didn't even see this post, I vote no to ceiling 
properties (22)
authormelbourneswest
permlinkre-vempromundo-qwr57p
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["hive-150329"],"app":"peakd/2021.07.2"}
created2021-07-24 13:52:36
last_update2021-07-24 13:52:36
depth1
children0
last_payout2021-07-31 13:52:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length50
author_reputation722,128,952,774,086
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,099,840
net_rshares0
@nikkybabe ·
>The value has to be something that doesn't affect content creators too much so as not to discourage them from continuing, but neither does its implementation make a difference

Thanks for this important topic the truth is that i don't really think it is better to write post. Cos the reward some people get does not usually correlate with effort spent in typing the post. I once discuss with someone who told me he loves posting but each time he post he always feel discourage and embarrassed because of the reward he do get from posting.

I have see a post today that someone post error and yet the person got 10pob just because of autovoting. I am even surprise that some that have high voting power still vote the content and this is the reason why i don't think autovoting is right. Check the post [here](https://www.proofofbrain.io/hive-167922/@zazufund/hello-i-am-zazufund-and-this-is-my-mission-for-leofinance) to see reason why i think auto voting is wrong as well. Now compare it to a post like [this](https://www.proofofbrain.io/hive-150329/@abimbola753/attitude-that-must-be-imbibed) having 1.54 pob. ***Tell me how do you expect someone like this to think of posting a meaningful post next time?***

@vempromundo i second your opinion and i think something has to be done regarding this. I wish this my message can be sent to every other person as well.

Honestly the community can be discouraging to some creative writer.



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@nikkybabe/qwijez)</sub></center>
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authornikkybabe
permlinkqwijez
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"users":["vempromundo"],"links":["https://www.proofofbrain.io/hive-167922/@zazufund/hello-i-am-zazufund-and-this-is-my-mission-for-leofinance"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@nikkybabe/qwijez"}
created2021-07-19 22:21:00
last_update2021-07-19 22:21:00
depth1
children1
last_payout2021-07-26 22:21:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,547
author_reputation68,849,649,066
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries
0.
accounthiveonboard
weight100
1.
accounttipu
weight100
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,019,400
net_rshares3,488,887,187
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@vempromundo ·
Thanks for the words and for the alert, I already left a negative vote and a comment, to correct the rewards and obviously I supported the publication of @abimbola753, an excellent user of the community and regular of PobTalk

Whenever you see a post that the rewards are out of step, don't hesitate to tag me or even @onealfa.pob in it so we can fix it



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@vempromundo/qwixh1)</sub></center>
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorvempromundo
permlinkqwixh1
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"users":["abimbola753","onealfa.pob"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@vempromundo/qwixh1"}
created2021-07-20 03:24:39
last_update2021-07-20 03:24:39
depth2
children0
last_payout2021-07-27 03:24:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length467
author_reputation170,354,435,472,572
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,022,799
net_rshares3,460,611,115
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@onealfa.pob ·
## I like this!
At least first small steps against circle-jerkers. Count on my support on this route.

>Very few publications manage to exceed this value, and when they do, they don't go much further. 

Are you serious? Very few? Don't go much further?

How about this:

[![top2authors.jpg](https://images.hive.blog/DQmca9E2gqTyT1HsAdV8JuhSkVjvojBMjAw57FLoMRC2JF9/top2authors.jpg)](https://images.hive.blog/DQmca9E2gqTyT1HsAdV8JuhSkVjvojBMjAw57FLoMRC2JF9/top2authors.jpg)
[click for full size]

 Only those posts above 230+ POB has been selected.
200+ POB they get on 95+% of their posts, no matter what's inside the post itself.



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@onealfa.pob/qwhqqe)</sub></center>
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authoronealfa.pob
permlinkqwhqqe
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"image":["https://images.hive.blog/DQmca9E2gqTyT1HsAdV8JuhSkVjvojBMjAw57FLoMRC2JF9/top2authors.jpg"],"links":["https://images.hive.blog/DQmca9E2gqTyT1HsAdV8JuhSkVjvojBMjAw57FLoMRC2JF9/top2authors.jpg"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@onealfa.pob/qwhqqe"}
created2021-07-19 12:01:27
last_update2021-07-19 12:01:27
depth1
children18
last_payout2021-07-26 12:01:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length743
author_reputation2,310,476,671,678
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,010,064
net_rshares3,743,630,235
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@katerinhernandez ·
> No matter what is inside the post.

Thanks for this important comment, I think that if we started talking about highly valued publications without offering truly valuable content, we would fall into the same old thing.



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@katerinhernandez/qwihug)</sub></center>
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authorkaterinhernandez
permlinkqwihug
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@katerinhernandez/qwihug"}
created2021-07-19 21:47:12
last_update2021-07-19 21:47:12
depth2
children0
last_payout2021-07-26 21:47:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length339
author_reputation27,418,744,569,307
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,018,937
net_rshares3,503,064,329
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@onealfa.pob · (edited)
# And here comes a *small contest.*
Be the first to guess who exactly were these two authors, (Author #1 and Author #2) in my screenshot above, and each right answer I  will reward with 10 staked POB's.  Let community know it's "heroes".  :)



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@onealfa.pob/qwj2ar)</sub></center>
properties (22)
authoronealfa.pob
permlinkqwj2ar
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@onealfa.pob/qwj2ar","links":["https://www.proofofbrain.io/@onealfa.pob/qwj2ar"]}
created2021-07-20 05:08:54
last_update2021-07-20 05:15:39
depth2
children7
last_payout2021-07-27 05:08:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length355
author_reputation2,310,476,671,678
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,023,951
net_rshares0
@calumam ·
![image.png](https://files.peakd.com/file/peakd-hive/calumam/244y815hhhUR2wWstAwsn8m7HJSNYJN4QwWaYjvMRFCQNJTTV53JRUhxSKotBg7TSP7zv.png)

The two authors are myself, @calumam, and @lucylin.



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@calumam/qwjere)</sub></center>
properties (22)
authorcalumam
permlinkqwjere
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"users":["calumam","lucylin"],"image":["https://files.peakd.com/file/peakd-hive/calumam/244y815hhhUR2wWstAwsn8m7HJSNYJN4QwWaYjvMRFCQNJTTV53JRUhxSKotBg7TSP7zv.png"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@calumam/qwjere"}
created2021-07-20 09:38:03
last_update2021-07-20 09:38:03
depth3
children6
last_payout2021-07-27 09:38:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length298
author_reputation21,805,435,583,895
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,026,833
net_rshares0
@scholaris.pob ·
Must be my computer.  I couldn't see anything.  I'll try somewhere else.



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@scholaris.pob/qwixww)</sub></center>
properties (22)
authorscholaris.pob
permlinkqwixww
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@scholaris.pob/qwixww"}
created2021-07-20 03:34:09
last_update2021-07-20 03:34:09
depth2
children0
last_payout2021-07-27 03:34:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length188
author_reputation3,074,855,239,378
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,022,880
net_rshares0
@scholaris.pob · (edited)
Nope couldn't see it, but I did see the rewards.  I tried ecency and peakd.  Oh, those were only two authors?  



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@scholaris.pob/qwixz8)</sub></center>
properties (22)
authorscholaris.pob
permlinkqwixz8
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@scholaris.pob/qwixz8","links":["https://www.proofofbrain.io/@scholaris.pob/qwixz8"]}
created2021-07-20 03:35:33
last_update2021-07-20 03:42:03
depth2
children2
last_payout2021-07-27 03:35:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length227
author_reputation3,074,855,239,378
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,022,896
net_rshares0
@vempromundo ·
He blurred the names of publications, presumably so there would be no retaliation, and left only the values showing.



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@vempromundo/qwizhz)</sub></center>
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorvempromundo
permlinkqwizhz
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@vempromundo/qwizhz"}
created2021-07-20 04:08:24
last_update2021-07-20 04:08:24
depth3
children1
last_payout2021-07-27 04:08:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length230
author_reputation170,354,435,472,572
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,023,297
net_rshares5,513,651,930
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@vempromundo ·
I thought it was much less, it is in fact I was wrong



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@vempromundo/qwibg0)</sub></center>
properties (22)
authorvempromundo
permlinkqwibg0
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@vempromundo/qwibg0"}
created2021-07-19 19:28:48
last_update2021-07-19 19:28:48
depth2
children4
last_payout2021-07-26 19:28:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length167
author_reputation170,354,435,472,572
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,016,988
net_rshares0
@scholaris.pob ·
Look.  I like your draft.  It's definitely not a method I've seen proposed yet in detail.  I'd love to see one.  Can you please also provide examples of what you feel are over-rewarded articles?

Honestly, I know it's putting you on the spot, but the biggest problem of these "over-rewarded" articles is a serious lack of objectivity.  You read arguments about how:
- The voter has a right to vote how they want
- Another voter has the right to remove rewards as they see fit
- DV is censorship
- There is nothing wrong with DV'ing

I agree we need something in place, but we need the community to get behind it.  

Thanks you for your time.



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@scholaris.pob/qwiy7g)</sub></center>
properties (22)
authorscholaris.pob
permlinkqwiy7g
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@scholaris.pob/qwiy7g"}
created2021-07-20 03:40:27
last_update2021-07-20 03:40:27
depth3
children2
last_payout2021-07-27 03:40:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length757
author_reputation3,074,855,239,378
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,022,944
net_rshares0
@scholaris.pob ·
Get clarification on voting rules first.  Trost's method of voting didn't work out as I don't believe 50% staked votes were even met.



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@scholaris.pob/qwiyjm)</sub></center>
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorscholaris.pob
permlinkqwiyjm
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@scholaris.pob/qwiyjm"}
created2021-07-20 03:47:45
last_update2021-07-20 03:47:45
depth3
children0
last_payout2021-07-27 03:47:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length249
author_reputation3,074,855,239,378
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,023,021
net_rshares365,977,287
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@ralexandria ·
$0.05
Hey bro, I thought the initiative to address this topic was cool, and from what I read in the comments it generated a lot of engagement.

But, I completely disagree with a maximum value, in my opinion this would distort the perception of value about the token and the act of curating and authoring itself in a negative way, generating more problems arising from the distortion of supply and demand.

One thing we've learned in failed economies is that the more rules are enforced, the closer that economy tends to collapse.



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@ralexandria/qwpxem)</sub></center>
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
authorralexandria
permlinkqwpxem
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@ralexandria/qwpxem"}
created2021-07-23 22:03:36
last_update2021-07-23 22:03:36
depth1
children29
last_payout2021-07-30 22:03:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.026 HBD
curator_payout_value0.026 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length637
author_reputation571,082,150,759
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,090,303
net_rshares79,832,219,613
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@onealfa.pob · (edited)
> One thing we've learned in failed economies is that the more rules are enforced, the closer that economy tends to collapse.

Sounds truthful.

In general, I don't like such limiting rules either.
But, I just can not find what other solution could be effective against a malicious circle-jerk voting. Like the "circle"  of lucylin-calumam-frot-richardcrill. 

Especially in a situation, when even tribe's founder/owner is actively supporting it, and we are all limited to ONLY ONE full downvote per day. 



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@onealfa.pob/qwqna0)</sub></center>
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authoronealfa.pob
permlinkqwqna0
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@onealfa.pob/qwqna0","links":["https://www.proofofbrain.io/@onealfa.pob/qwqna0"]}
created2021-07-24 07:25:12
last_update2021-07-24 07:28:54
depth2
children27
last_payout2021-07-31 07:25:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length619
author_reputation2,310,476,671,678
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,095,717
net_rshares4,739,163,771
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@calumam ·
$0.28
Circle? 

@richardcrill autovotes content and has been for months. He hasn't removed it even after your post. 
@lucylin publishes good content, I vote. @frot posts good content, I vote. Maybe their personalities aren't your cup of tea, but I think they're a good laugh.

I also upvote people like... @hranhuk, @shubhwaj, @aiuna, @offgridlife, @sofs-su, @edystringz, @jaxsonmurph, @mineopoly, @thomashnblum, @melbourneswest, @revise.pob, @wiseagent, @alekst7, @clixmoney, @allcapsonezero, @elricmoonslayer, @sugandhaseth, @anacristinasilva, @dwinblood, @interpretation, @malopie, @katerinhernandez, @scholaris.pob @nonsowrites.pob, @trostparadox, @josediccus, @denmarkguy, @kemmyb, @captaincryptic, @thoughts-in-time, @phusionphil, @uwelang, @samsmith1971, @shepz1, @fireguardian, @memeisfun 

(probably missing some, but it's quite the circle. https://hivestats.io/@calumam)

<br>

---

>malicious circle-jerk voting

Now. Let's objectively define malicious.

>characterized by malice; intending or intended to do harm

Please, if you are able, can you state what harm is intended? I think some clarity on this would be important for the community. 

I'm curious because I noticed your downvotes on @lucylin's comment votes as well as his posts. So some clarity on your definition of "malicious" would be *fantastic*. Not just for me, but so that the community can understand what is deemed as malicious so they're not hit by your downvote too.

<br>

---

![image.png](https://files.peakd.com/file/peakd-hive/calumam/23t8D1dmsHzcwg9hy5pMwqNLTYMdZ7it7QqBLheVXnctqPy3CgNxsbvuNJwzW8tR4oQFp.png)

---

You also removed my vote to @shubhwaj on this comment. The guy made a funny? 1.8 POB? Alright, seriously now, what's your definition of malicious?

![image.png](https://files.peakd.com/file/peakd-hive/calumam/23tmmjqSSRURnxYSe76MJTFnfCT3RTpxoBgF7otPWYAvVJXwWjfddKgkYqrrWdfXfWU27.png)

<br>

---


Disagreement of rewards? Well, back it up. You seem to pick and choose who you downvote but still drop the occasional comment saying what is over-rewarded. 

![image.png](https://files.peakd.com/file/peakd-hive/calumam/Eo8ZYavBPp6bRsDDUTZWgnXWbWHbgYC52JHhBxSBuWxEEwyWkmLKFJEv9vBeWo29QQZ.png)
<sub><sup>https://www.proofofbrain.io/hive-150329/@onealfa.pob/qwhqqe#@onealfa.pob/qwkzew</sup></sub>

so alfa, *why do you not downvoted then?*

<br>

---

<sub>P.S. with your definition and explanation about the malicious nature of the votes (which you'll obviously share, because you love replying to me), just so you don't throw your friend under the bus, @vempromundo is also followed by @richardcrill's autovote. He's supported by this "malicious circle-jerk voting" by proxy.</sub>


Ask yourself if you are reading along... is this unnecessary drama? or is this genuinely important since @onealfa is the #2 stakeholder on the platform?



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@calumam/qwqwyi)</sub></center>
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorcalumam
permlinkqwqwyi
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"users":["richardcrill","lucylin","frot","hranhuk","shubhwaj","aiuna","offgridlife","sofs-su","edystringz","jaxsonmurph","mineopoly","thomashnblum","melbourneswest","revise.pob","wiseagent","alekst7","clixmoney","allcapsonezero","elricmoonslayer","sugandhaseth","anacristinasilva","dwinblood","interpretation","malopie","katerinhernandez","scholaris.pob","nonsowrites.pob","trostparadox","josediccus","denmarkguy","kemmyb","captaincryptic","thoughts-in-time","phusionphil","uwelang","samsmith1971","shepz1","fireguardian","memeisfun","vempromundo","onealfa"],"image":["https://files.peakd.com/file/peakd-hive/calumam/23t8D1dmsHzcwg9hy5pMwqNLTYMdZ7it7QqBLheVXnctqPy3CgNxsbvuNJwzW8tR4oQFp.png","https://files.peakd.com/file/peakd-hive/calumam/23tmmjqSSRURnxYSe76MJTFnfCT3RTpxoBgF7otPWYAvVJXwWjfddKgkYqrrWdfXfWU27.png","https://files.peakd.com/file/peakd-hive/calumam/Eo8ZYavBPp6bRsDDUTZWgnXWbWHbgYC52JHhBxSBuWxEEwyWkmLKFJEv9vBeWo29QQZ.png"],"links":["https://hivestats.io/@calumam"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@calumam/qwqwyi"}
created2021-07-24 10:54:18
last_update2021-07-24 10:54:18
depth3
children11
last_payout2021-07-31 10:54:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.139 HBD
curator_payout_value0.138 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length2,941
author_reputation21,805,435,583,895
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,097,714
net_rshares411,517,831,655
author_curate_reward""
vote details (11)
@frot ·
$0.11
How about you post one of those pictures of my pob voting trail?

Just who am I voting for again?
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authorfrot
permlinkre-onealfapob-qwrl7n
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["hive-150329"],"app":"peakd/2021.07.2"}
created2021-07-24 19:38:12
last_update2021-07-24 19:38:12
depth3
children13
last_payout2021-07-31 19:38:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.055 HBD
curator_payout_value0.055 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length97
author_reputation94,148,415,747,890
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,104,252
net_rshares162,581,688,288
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@phusionphil ·
Protectionist mindstates are not my cup of tea either.

I voted no on both of the Downvote proposals.

I also see things as black and white, and detest the mediation and middle ground ideology where everyone has to make a sacrifice, may as well quit and start their own communities without the socialism.

I would have a lot more POB if it wasn't for this debate, I was going to try to match you @onealfa.pob but that idea was dead on arrival as soon as I heard my downvoted would be moderated.

I understand your frustration and would be livid if I had not sold any POB, as well as bought more. 
properties (22)
authorphusionphil
permlinkre-onealfapob-2021724t13585817z
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["hive-150329","proofofbrain"],"app":"ecency/3.0.19-mobile","format":"markdown+html"}
created2021-07-24 19:58:06
last_update2021-07-24 19:58:06
depth3
children0
last_payout2021-07-31 19:58:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length596
author_reputation94,174,734,431,185
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,104,476
net_rshares0
@scholaris.pob ·
I don't think it would work either, but I was fascinated by the concept though.  I couldn't help but read on.  I agree with your other points too.



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@scholaris.pob/qwrf1z)</sub></center>
properties (22)
authorscholaris.pob
permlinkqwrf1z
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@scholaris.pob/qwrf1z"}
created2021-07-24 17:25:12
last_update2021-07-24 17:25:12
depth2
children0
last_payout2021-07-31 17:25:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length262
author_reputation3,074,855,239,378
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,102,580
net_rshares0
@rentmoney · (edited)
I agree, I made a similar suggestion years ago on Steemit. I would also suggest auto staking some of the earned POB when paying out. Auto stake will help with keeping  POB off the sales market.
properties (22)
authorrentmoney
permlinkqwkpd4
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"app":"hiveblog/0.1"}
created2021-07-21 02:24:42
last_update2021-07-21 02:26:27
depth1
children0
last_payout2021-07-28 02:24:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length193
author_reputation446,802,701,188,781
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,039,923
net_rshares0
@shubhwaj ·
I appreciate your concerns regarding inflation and suggestions to carry out a more pulled back approach with curation in the community. I don't think capping rewards at any  number would be a good idea. I have some reasons and more to say and I don't usually shy away writing essay kind of comments πŸ˜… But since this has came up in a few threads several times before and is something relevant to the whole community,  I will write a post. 🧐



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@shubhwaj/qwi2ck)</sub></center>
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
authorshubhwaj
permlinkqwi2ck
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@shubhwaj/qwi2ck"}
created2021-07-19 16:12:24
last_update2021-07-19 16:12:24
depth1
children0
last_payout2021-07-26 16:12:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length550
author_reputation15,981,250,845,185
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,013,974
net_rshares3,564,289,696
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@sugandhaseth ·
While I completely agree that some people getting such high rewards everytime on their posts, no matter what they post, is wrong. 

One day I was just going through the trending posts and trying to analyze what's in it that they are getting such heavy rewards and honestly, found some of them to be really absurd. I mean where I would not want to upvote at all. Again, that's a very subjective matter and I don't intend to disrespect either the author or the curators but we got to value the content that adds the most value. 

That being said, I don't think capping is a really good idea because that would take away the charm of getting great upvotes. If I know the max I can get is this much, I would not put additional effort to get more. Some of us work really hard to get good upvotes and it's a great feeling to get a +100 POB upvote occasionally. And then the upvote value goes up to +150 sometimes. And it's so good to see that value rising. But if there's a cap on it, as an author, it would demotivate me to deliver good quality content.



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@sugandhaseth/qwn6vu)</sub></center>
properties (22)
authorsugandhaseth
permlinkqwn6vu
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@sugandhaseth/qwn6vu"}
created2021-07-22 10:38:18
last_update2021-07-22 10:38:18
depth1
children0
last_payout2021-07-29 10:38:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,163
author_reputation635,945,685,185,361
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,062,699
net_rshares0
@supriya.gupta ·
Also there must be clear understanding of the proposal drafted,

Posted Using [LeoFinance <sup>Beta</sup>](https://leofinance.io/@supriya.gupta/re-vempromundo-6lizu6)
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authorsupriya.gupta
permlinkre-vempromundo-6lizu6
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"app":"leofinance/0.2","format":"markdown","tags":["hive-150329","leofinance","hive-167922"],"canonical_url":"https://leofinance.io/@supriya.gupta/re-vempromundo-6lizu6"}
created2021-07-19 10:17:15
last_update2021-07-19 10:17:15
depth1
children0
last_payout2021-07-26 10:17:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length166
author_reputation73,450,734,773,566
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,008,972
net_rshares3,500,182,703
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@timmzey ·
i think there should be a way to reward writers i mean a fix reward for every content writer,but getting rids of fake and abusive content is necessary so i think this is where down vote is important,  but i suggest that downvote should not reduce the reward but rather give signal to the admin to review the post and now judge the content if it is worthy of reward



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@timmzey/qwhm93)</sub></center>
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
authortimmzey
permlinkqwhm93
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@timmzey/qwhm93"}
created2021-07-19 10:24:39
last_update2021-07-19 10:24:39
depth1
children2
last_payout2021-07-26 10:24:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length474
author_reputation-159,783,542,679
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries
0.
accounthiveonboard
weight100
1.
accounttipu
weight100
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,009,035
net_rshares3,888,488,709
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@abbey877 ·
I'm strongly agreed with you opinion especially those post that is creative and education it is never easy to write a post and you just see that the end of the day you end up with nothing ..that is not coursing at all



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@abbey877/qwn8dp)</sub></center>
properties (22)
authorabbey877
permlinkqwn8dp
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@abbey877/qwn8dp"}
created2021-07-22 11:10:39
last_update2021-07-22 11:10:39
depth2
children1
last_payout2021-07-29 11:10:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length328
author_reputation1,707,813,687,277
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries
0.
accounthiveonboard
weight100
1.
accounttipu
weight100
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,063,119
net_rshares0
@timmzey ·
yes boss it is very discouraging,even before i write any post i do think twice but i just hope i see reward , but once there is fix reward for writers people will be ready and be willing to write any time
properties (22)
authortimmzey
permlinkre-abbey877-qwn9eo
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["hive-150329"],"app":"peakd/2021.07.2"}
created2021-07-22 11:32:48
last_update2021-07-22 11:32:48
depth3
children0
last_payout2021-07-29 11:32:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length204
author_reputation-159,783,542,679
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,063,350
net_rshares0
@trostparadox ·
Kudos to @vempromundo for drafting this and seeking debate and comments! 

I will be upvoting the post to maximize engagement, even though the post is already above the draft 'ceiling' value of 200 POB.

In any event, I cannot say I have formed any significant thoughts or opinions on this issue, as of yet.

***My main suggestion:  I think we really need to clarify at the outset what behavior(s) we are wanting to influence.***

That is necessary so we can play devil's advocate and identify the ways folks might be able to 'game' the system.

As @heruvim1978 pointed out [here](https://www.proofofbrain.io/hive-150329/@heruvim1978/qwi9bt), an author taking what would have been published as a single post and publishing it as two posts easily circumvents the ceiling.

If circle-voting is the issue, then multiple posts also circumvents the intention behind the ceiling.

If the issue is trying to keep POB tokens from being consolidated by too few account holders, multiple accounts and/or multiple posts would be an easy work-around.

If the issue is 'over-rewarded' posts, then as @scholaris.pob pointed out [here](https://www.proofofbrain.io/hive-150329/@scholaris.pob/qwiy7g), we probably need to establish some objective standards first.

I have had some recent discussions with @scholaris about the 'over-reward' issue.  I think he and I are in agreement that monitoring and policing of excess rewards needs to be at the community-level and needs to be based on some objective standards (i.e. an author should have some idea the 'max reward' his/her post will receive *before publishing it*; similarly, an upvoter should have some idea *prior to upvoting* whether his/her upvote is going to put a post beyond the community's standards for 'max reward').

A single 'max reward' per post is certainly very objective (which is good), but it fails to take into consideration other issues, such as length of post, effort associated with authoring the post, and the fact that sometimes rewards are given based on more than just the direct content of the post at hand (what I refer to as 'nuanced voting').

For example, I have upvoted @leprechaun's posts about his work on a new PoB front-end not because of the content of the posts themselves *per se* ,but because of all the behind-the-scenes efforts that are going into creating that new front-end.

Here is another example:  @onealfa.pob gave a 100% upvote to a 40-word comment [here](https://www.proofofbrain.io/hive-150329/@melbourneswest/qw7ygp) with the promise of ["owing [the commenter] a few more 100% UP's for that"](https://www.proofofbrain.io/hive-150329/@onealfa.pob/qwa0jz) -- based on his agreement with what was stated in those 40 words.

Maybe the community wants to put a stop to 'nuanced' upvoting, where the curator is voting for more than just the direct effort put into the content of the post at hand.  If so, as I mentioned above, whatever *behavior(s)* we want to specifically disincentivize (i.e. penalize) should be clearly identified as a precursor to creating the associated 'rules' or protocols meant to influence those behaviors.



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@trostparadox/qwmu3a)</sub></center>
πŸ‘  , , ,
properties (23)
authortrostparadox
permlinkqwmu3a
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"users":["vempromundo","heruvim1978","scholaris.pob","scholaris","leprechaun","onealfa.pob"],"links":["https://www.proofofbrain.io/hive-150329/@heruvim1978/qwi9bt"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@trostparadox/qwmu3a"}
created2021-07-22 06:02:00
last_update2021-07-22 06:02:00
depth1
children1
last_payout2021-07-29 06:02:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length3,231
author_reputation97,547,813,241,256
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd0
post_id105,059,913
net_rshares11,122,940,799
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@heruvim1978 ·
There is the model of Publish0x where you have only 5 votes daily, so limiting votes, but in the end it will only be a game of cat and mouse. There will always be some trying to go around the system, i think the education is the primary aim, with good curators consistently helping good publishers. If psychology helps, rewarding for good deeds always works better than punishing for bad ones.
properties (22)
authorheruvim1978
permlinkqwna5v
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"app":"hiveblog/0.1"}
created2021-07-22 11:49:06
last_update2021-07-22 11:49:06
depth2
children0
last_payout2021-07-29 11:49:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length393
author_reputation142,356,294,881,973
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries
0.
accounthiveonboard
weight100
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd0
post_id105,063,565
net_rshares0
@vikbuddy ·
Hello everyone, I want to suggest that the maximum reward should be considered in USD fiat currency, not on POB. I wish POB reach $1 but what if it stays around 0.1 or 0.2$. Then you think 200 POB is very much amount. We can see Posts upto 100$ on hive and trending page. The community can decide the maximum amount, 50 or 100$ but my concern is it should be in usd. We don't know how pob price gonna change, so judging the amount of POB on a post is not fair. I also request the POB developers to add a option of displaying authors rewards in USD and POB both as we have in Leofinance. It's just my point of view, what say friends?



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@vikbuddy/qwiyxo)</sub></center>
πŸ‘  
πŸ‘Ž  
properties (23)
authorvikbuddy
permlinkqwiyxo
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@vikbuddy/qwiyxo"}
created2021-07-20 03:56:18
last_update2021-07-20 03:56:18
depth1
children2
last_payout2021-07-27 03:56:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length743
author_reputation119,805,806,659,891
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,023,127
net_rshares-10,238,917,677
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@onealfa.pob · (edited)
I strongly against measuring the limit in FIAT. Only in POB makes sense.

>so judging the amount of POB on a post is not fair.

 It is FAIR. And here is why.

I do not care at all, how many USD somebody on POB tribe will gain.    The same way how I don't care (or envy), how many fiat dollars gain every day Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos.

According to POB algorithm, every day (24h) a 7200 new POB tokens are issued (24 x 6 x 50).  This will stay so the next 3.5 years.
 If calumam and lucylin together takes 10% of it (300+400) - does it seem fair to you ???   What if they start to post more than once a day?  With enough support of their allies whales, they could reach even 20%  or more.
How the newcomers to this tribe will feel seeing this ? Do you want this?
Reward pool is measured in POB. And the limit (if it will take place) should be measured also in POB



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@onealfa.pob/qwjgk8)</sub></center>
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authoronealfa.pob
permlinkqwjgk8
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@onealfa.pob/qwjgk8","links":["https://www.proofofbrain.io/@onealfa.pob/qwjgk8"]}
created2021-07-20 10:16:57
last_update2021-07-20 10:42:18
depth2
children1
last_payout2021-07-27 10:16:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length975
author_reputation2,310,476,671,678
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,027,231
net_rshares2,025,638,034
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@vikbuddy ·
>Reward pool is measured in POB. And the limit (if it will take place) should be measured also in POB

That's true, πŸ‘. Over all it is a good proposal. We still though need to consider every aspect. It's a nice start to come up with draft and taking consideration from the community. It is a win win for all. It should be welcomed by the community, I am positive. 😊



---

<center><sub>Posted via [proofofbrain.io](https://www.proofofbrain.io/@vikbuddy/qwjiqz)</sub></center>
πŸ‘Ž  
properties (23)
authorvikbuddy
permlinkqwjiqz
categoryhive-150329
json_metadata{"tags":["proofofbrain"],"app":"proofofbrain/0.1","canonical_url":"https://www.proofofbrain.io/@vikbuddy/qwjiqz"}
created2021-07-20 11:04:12
last_update2021-07-20 11:04:12
depth3
children0
last_payout2021-07-27 11:04:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length475
author_reputation119,805,806,659,891
root_title"Maximum reward - A draft of a proposal"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id105,027,709
net_rshares-9,729,980,773
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)