Viewing a response to: @joshman/joshman-re-ssg-community-py8kdm-20190922t152210414z
@trafalgar gave a 100% downvote and his curation trail followed suit, by the looks of things. His 100% downvote knocked nearly $15 off this post... If (s)he had read it and thought this post was of poor quality and brought ZERO value to the steem platform, I could understand. I've personally seen far worse posts pick up bigger payout values simply because of who they are written by and not their content. So either they think the #steemsilverround adds no value to the steemit platform??? I'm guessing it's not this option. OR This #newsteem is a load of rubbish and simply means if your face fits, you can still plunder the rewards pool.....
author | welshstacker |
---|---|
permlink | py8wp8 |
category | steemit |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steemit","steemsilverround","newsteem"],"users":["trafalgar"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2019-09-22 18:29:33 |
last_update | 2019-09-22 18:30:15 |
depth | 5 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2019-09-29 18:29:33 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 649 |
author_reputation | 750,518,343,716,278 |
root_title | "2019 STEEM silver round now on SALE" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 90,828,642 |
net_rshares | 13,134,467,509 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
stokjockey | 0 | 0 | 67% | ||
buggedout | 0 | 11,839,884,065 | 100% | ||
jonknight | 0 | 1,294,583,444 | 100% |