Viewing a response to: @hendrix22/re-worldfinances-re-hendrix22-re-beanz-re-timcliff-re-pathtosuccess-re-timcliff-re-blocktrades-voting-abuse-and-ineffective-curation-a-proposal-for-blockchain-level-change-20171204t144740897z
"Just for visibility" is again, something that bigger self-voters mentioned now and than, why did they do that, and continued with the comment due to the article. What you have been told is pretty accurate :) And I 'd also upvote your comment but I delegated most of my SP, so my upvote is not worth even a cent
author | worldfinances |
---|---|
permlink | re-hendrix22-re-worldfinances-re-hendrix22-re-beanz-re-timcliff-re-pathtosuccess-re-timcliff-re-blocktrades-voting-abuse-and-ineffective-curation-a-proposal-for-blockchain-level-change-20171204t145823680z |
category | steem |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2017-12-04 14:58:27 |
last_update | 2017-12-04 15:00:21 |
depth | 8 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-12-11 14:58:27 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.060 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.005 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 312 |
author_reputation | 10,603,797,054,712 |
root_title | "Voting Abuse and Ineffective Curation: A proposal for blockchain-level change" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 22,370,132 |
net_rshares | 17,980,845,169 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
worldfinances | 0 | 7,061,163,444 | 100% | ||
hendrix22 | 0 | 10,919,681,725 | 3% |