create account

RE: Voting Abuse and Ineffective Curation: A proposal for blockchain-level change by worldfinances

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @hendrix22/re-worldfinances-re-hendrix22-re-beanz-re-timcliff-re-pathtosuccess-re-timcliff-re-blocktrades-voting-abuse-and-ineffective-curation-a-proposal-for-blockchain-level-change-20171204t144740897z

· @worldfinances · (edited)
$0.07
"Just for visibility" is again, something that bigger self-voters mentioned now and than, why did they do that, and continued with the comment  due to the article. What you have been told is pretty accurate :) And I 'd also upvote your comment but I delegated most of my SP, so my upvote is not worth even a cent
👍  ,
properties (23)
authorworldfinances
permlinkre-hendrix22-re-worldfinances-re-hendrix22-re-beanz-re-timcliff-re-pathtosuccess-re-timcliff-re-blocktrades-voting-abuse-and-ineffective-curation-a-proposal-for-blockchain-level-change-20171204t145823680z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-12-04 14:58:27
last_update2017-12-04 15:00:21
depth8
children0
last_payout2017-12-11 14:58:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.060 HBD
curator_payout_value0.005 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length312
author_reputation10,603,797,054,712
root_title"Voting Abuse and Ineffective Curation: A proposal for blockchain-level change"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id22,370,132
net_rshares17,980,845,169
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)