The need for a simple need and reason about why, in fact, about the discussion is not correct, and also how to argue correctly it is necessary to reason it is impossible to carry out a revolution the philosophy of young people who studied at Cambridge, one of them began mathematics other philology and Kuban in the train fundamental questions in their disciplines that inevitably brought them to philosophy as a science and the non-science engaged in the most common on the question one of them was called Bertrand Russell the other George Moore and from the filing of the scattering began the development This is the very formal-logical methodology how many grew up was the mathematician and the logician. He suggested that such a thing is possible. Logic is able to reveal the inner language and show where this structure leads to the construction of the wrong sentence and accordingly the reform of the language its refinement will allow the philosopher and not the philosopher all other people to use more accurate in my own way, nutritional attempts. And besides. Well, of course, this entire story had a background, but I will only say 2 in important episodes when you are a prehistory of the first rvyh about the fact that in the late XIX century will be and at the beginning of the XX century it might seem that this is a new, unprecedentedly accurate instrument of philosophical reasoning that should be put into action sooner and the second moment is the development of Hegelianism, the hegelianism of objective idealism in Europe in particular in Britain against which Rasoul rose Omarov an axana of the city of Britain, you such an infection did not have an offspring Yes it was an attempt to return a truly national newborn with scissors that then in Germany there were romantics of philosophy in literature and But the main they were only in literature before the philosophy as You initially did not make it so that it would quickly end But here I am then you said More Cupid Yes, and in this connection Let's remember in my opinion, too, to indicate for example when this is the outside world yes Just in vain the problem that faced Kant Designated Canada until the end was Ivanovsk