Steem experienced a sharp rise and fall in value. In the meantime, in the fight between buyers and sellers, Steem has dominated the sellers. This asymmetry has caused continuous price declines. The reasons for the sale of steem were large, but the reason for the purchase was not large. You can buy Steem and power up to increase the recommendation power from Steemit, but the loss due to steem depreciation is much greater. What is needed to buy an outside steem is an increase in steem value. Or, to raise value, the issue of finding a driver to buy steem from outside may be a priority.

I think the answer to such a problem is the increase in Steemit Users. Now Steemit is only done for internal activities, but it is rarely published outside. The users don't have enough drivers to introduce Steemit's articles to external social networks like Facebook or Twitter.

I think there should be a change in the steemit compensation system to recommend this.

## I suggest this way.

We need to change the recommendation system. Internal recommendation 50%, external recommendation 50%. It does not have to be 50:50. It is also possible to set an external referral cap instead of a flat rate.

When external referrals are reflected in the rewards, people will actively introduce their posts to SNS like Facebook or Twitter. There will be an increase in the number of people entering the steemit from the outside, and some will be steem users.

The increase in users may result in a reduction in the number of steem and the number of steem dollars distributed, but it may be offset or increased as the value of steem increases.