Well on the other side of that coin, the weapon can be used against the 0.1% of society, specifically because of its decentralized nature.  Therein lies the incentive to avoid violating the NAP.  Covering your own ass.  And the 0.1% of society has a lot more to lose than the rest of society, especially on the bottom half socio-economically speaking.  I'm personally not interested in participating in anything like this, but as a thought exercise it seems to have internal consistency IMO.