create account

RE: 636,333 WITH 194 MEMBERS AND COUNTING by midlet

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @nathen007/re-backscratcher-625-660-with-194-members-and-counting-20190331t143338304z

· @midlet ·
No, it gives people a base minimum of earnings. It doesn’t mean people aren’t reading posts, it doesn’t mean the content isn’t high quality. With that logic you’re against curie and every other curation trail. You think everyone following those trails is reading the posts? They exist to reward people that are contributing high quality content. I see this more for people who are contributing regular daily content.

Posted using [Partiko iOS](https://partiko.app/referral/midlet)
👍  
properties (23)
authormidlet
permlinkmidlet-re-nathen007-re-backscratcher-625-660-with-194-members-and-counting-20190331t163430008z
categorybackscratcher
json_metadata{"app":"partiko","client":"ios"}
created2019-03-31 16:34:30
last_update2019-03-31 16:34:30
depth2
children12
last_payout2019-04-07 16:34:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length481
author_reputation293,267,832,592,637
root_title"636,333 WITH 194 MEMBERS AND COUNTING"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id82,257,848
net_rshares10,674,908,230
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@freebornangel · (edited)
> With that logic you’re against curie and every other curation trail. 

Yes, called them out when they started self voting with ned's posting key.
Before delegation was a thing.

I read my curation trails.
properties (22)
authorfreebornangel
permlinkre-midlet-midlet-re-nathen007-re-backscratcher-625-660-with-194-members-and-counting-20190401t221348661z
categorybackscratcher
json_metadata{"tags":["backscratcher"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2019-04-01 22:14:06
last_update2019-04-01 22:15:42
depth3
children0
last_payout2019-04-08 22:14:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length206
author_reputation171,005,551,503,977
root_title"636,333 WITH 194 MEMBERS AND COUNTING"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id82,331,995
net_rshares0
@nathen007 ·
$0.64
Curie and C squared manually curate every post they upvote. Following is a sad ability to allow here though. Follow for follow and vote for vote IS an even worse idea. Who is checking the quality however and of they are checking it, why not read it too. Seriously, these 'schemes' where the priority is simply grabbing rewards will kill this blockchain and keep the overall content quality low thus discouraging new creators.
👍  , , ,
properties (23)
authornathen007
permlinkre-midlet-midlet-re-nathen007-re-backscratcher-625-660-with-194-members-and-counting-20190331t170712793z
categorybackscratcher
json_metadata{"tags":["backscratcher"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2019-03-31 17:07:15
last_update2019-03-31 17:07:15
depth3
children10
last_payout2019-04-07 17:07:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.483 HBD
curator_payout_value0.160 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length425
author_reputation263,417,976,467,875
root_title"636,333 WITH 194 MEMBERS AND COUNTING"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd0
post_id82,259,701
net_rshares862,560,008,394
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@midlet ·
One curators reads a post and a few others approve it with curie. The several hundreds of votes that follow are automated. Also, what is high quality content? 

People have been saying  “THIS thing will ruin this platform!” for years now. No it won’t. I need to go ahead and buy some drama tokens for moments like this.
properties (22)
authormidlet
permlinkre-nathen007-re-midlet-midlet-re-nathen007-re-backscratcher-625-660-with-194-members-and-counting-20190331t173501655z
categorybackscratcher
json_metadata{"tags":["backscratcher"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2019-03-31 17:35:03
last_update2019-03-31 17:35:03
depth4
children9
last_payout2019-04-07 17:35:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length319
author_reputation293,267,832,592,637
root_title"636,333 WITH 194 MEMBERS AND COUNTING"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id82,261,156
net_rshares0
@anthonyadavisii ·
$0.64
You said:

> With that logic you’re against curie and every other curation trail. 

Then said when describing curie:

> One curators reads a post

So, you are admitting that content voted by @curie is actually reviewed before voting so that would make that process fundamentally different.

With that in mind, it doesn't really make sense for you to assert that for one to be critical of this "curation" trail that one must necessarily be against manual curation projects.

Posted using [Partiko Android](https://partiko.app/referral/anthonyadavisii)
👍  , ,
properties (23)
authoranthonyadavisii
permlinkanthonyadavisii-re-midlet-re-nathen007-re-midlet-midlet-re-nathen007-re-backscratcher-625-660-with-194-members-and-counting-20190401t025931260z
categorybackscratcher
json_metadata{"app":"partiko","client":"android"}
created2019-04-01 02:59:30
last_update2019-04-01 02:59:30
depth5
children8
last_payout2019-04-08 02:59:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.481 HBD
curator_payout_value0.159 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length550
author_reputation213,418,991,244,265
root_title"636,333 WITH 194 MEMBERS AND COUNTING"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id82,284,233
net_rshares859,515,798,855
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)