Viewing a response to: @nathen007/re-backscratcher-625-660-with-194-members-and-counting-20190331t143338304z
No, it gives people a base minimum of earnings. It doesn’t mean people aren’t reading posts, it doesn’t mean the content isn’t high quality. With that logic you’re against curie and every other curation trail. You think everyone following those trails is reading the posts? They exist to reward people that are contributing high quality content. I see this more for people who are contributing regular daily content. Posted using [Partiko iOS](https://partiko.app/referral/midlet)
author | midlet |
---|---|
permlink | midlet-re-nathen007-re-backscratcher-625-660-with-194-members-and-counting-20190331t163430008z |
category | backscratcher |
json_metadata | {"app":"partiko","client":"ios"} |
created | 2019-03-31 16:34:30 |
last_update | 2019-03-31 16:34:30 |
depth | 2 |
children | 12 |
last_payout | 2019-04-07 16:34:30 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 481 |
author_reputation | 293,267,832,592,637 |
root_title | "636,333 WITH 194 MEMBERS AND COUNTING" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 82,257,848 |
net_rshares | 10,674,908,230 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
backscratcher | 0 | 10,674,908,230 | 19% |
> With that logic you’re against curie and every other curation trail. Yes, called them out when they started self voting with ned's posting key. Before delegation was a thing. I read my curation trails.
author | freebornangel |
---|---|
permlink | re-midlet-midlet-re-nathen007-re-backscratcher-625-660-with-194-members-and-counting-20190401t221348661z |
category | backscratcher |
json_metadata | {"tags":["backscratcher"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2019-04-01 22:14:06 |
last_update | 2019-04-01 22:15:42 |
depth | 3 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2019-04-08 22:14:06 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 206 |
author_reputation | 171,005,551,503,977 |
root_title | "636,333 WITH 194 MEMBERS AND COUNTING" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 82,331,995 |
net_rshares | 0 |
Curie and C squared manually curate every post they upvote. Following is a sad ability to allow here though. Follow for follow and vote for vote IS an even worse idea. Who is checking the quality however and of they are checking it, why not read it too. Seriously, these 'schemes' where the priority is simply grabbing rewards will kill this blockchain and keep the overall content quality low thus discouraging new creators.
author | nathen007 |
---|---|
permlink | re-midlet-midlet-re-nathen007-re-backscratcher-625-660-with-194-members-and-counting-20190331t170712793z |
category | backscratcher |
json_metadata | {"tags":["backscratcher"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2019-03-31 17:07:15 |
last_update | 2019-03-31 17:07:15 |
depth | 3 |
children | 10 |
last_payout | 2019-04-07 17:07:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.483 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.160 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 425 |
author_reputation | 263,417,976,467,875 |
root_title | "636,333 WITH 194 MEMBERS AND COUNTING" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 0 |
post_id | 82,259,701 |
net_rshares | 862,560,008,394 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
transisto | 0 | 855,678,591,643 | 100% | ||
anthonyadavisii | 0 | 6,148,345,739 | 5% | ||
weaver1911 | 0 | 289,308,129 | 100% | ||
cubebomb | 0 | 443,762,883 | 86% |
One curators reads a post and a few others approve it with curie. The several hundreds of votes that follow are automated. Also, what is high quality content? People have been saying “THIS thing will ruin this platform!” for years now. No it won’t. I need to go ahead and buy some drama tokens for moments like this.
author | midlet |
---|---|
permlink | re-nathen007-re-midlet-midlet-re-nathen007-re-backscratcher-625-660-with-194-members-and-counting-20190331t173501655z |
category | backscratcher |
json_metadata | {"tags":["backscratcher"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2019-03-31 17:35:03 |
last_update | 2019-03-31 17:35:03 |
depth | 4 |
children | 9 |
last_payout | 2019-04-07 17:35:03 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 319 |
author_reputation | 293,267,832,592,637 |
root_title | "636,333 WITH 194 MEMBERS AND COUNTING" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 82,261,156 |
net_rshares | 0 |
You said: > With that logic you’re against curie and every other curation trail. Then said when describing curie: > One curators reads a post So, you are admitting that content voted by @curie is actually reviewed before voting so that would make that process fundamentally different. With that in mind, it doesn't really make sense for you to assert that for one to be critical of this "curation" trail that one must necessarily be against manual curation projects. Posted using [Partiko Android](https://partiko.app/referral/anthonyadavisii)
author | anthonyadavisii |
---|---|
permlink | anthonyadavisii-re-midlet-re-nathen007-re-midlet-midlet-re-nathen007-re-backscratcher-625-660-with-194-members-and-counting-20190401t025931260z |
category | backscratcher |
json_metadata | {"app":"partiko","client":"android"} |
created | 2019-04-01 02:59:30 |
last_update | 2019-04-01 02:59:30 |
depth | 5 |
children | 8 |
last_payout | 2019-04-08 02:59:30 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.481 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.159 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 550 |
author_reputation | 213,418,991,244,265 |
root_title | "636,333 WITH 194 MEMBERS AND COUNTING" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 82,284,233 |
net_rshares | 859,515,798,855 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
transisto | 0 | 838,570,110,406 | 100% | ||
guiltyparties | 0 | 18,834,734,182 | 5% | ||
nathen007 | 0 | 2,110,954,267 | 100% |