Viewing a response to: @steemitblog/blockchain-update-2-hf20-progress-and-bandwidth-changes
Look interesting and probably is an improvement. Otherwise, you wouldn't be pondering about it and developing it. For me, the bandwidth *model* is (was) a non-issue. I never even tried to understand it and it never was a problem. It might be a different story for new users with a low amount of SP, though. Will this GC approach in any way force the change of behavior of an average user? Ps: I love the usage of high-speech in some sentences. Looks like you developers are also philosophers and psychologists at the same time :)
author | ervin-lemark |
---|---|
permlink | re-steemitblog-blockchain-update-2-hf20-progress-and-bandwidth-changes-20180613t092027878z |
category | bandwidth |
json_metadata | {"tags":["bandwidth"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2018-06-13 09:20:57 |
last_update | 2018-06-13 09:20:57 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2018-06-20 09:20:57 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 532 |
author_reputation | 472,039,127,957,486 |
root_title | "Blockchain Update 2: HF20 Progress & Bandwidth Changes" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 60,559,756 |
net_rshares | 0 |