create account

RE: Steem Bandwidth - User Experience Issue by timcliff

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @evolved08gsr/re-timcliff-steem-bandwidth-user-experience-issue-20180110t202820553z

· @timcliff ·
$0.04
That is not how it works. Every server that runs the blockchain software must have it’s own local copy of the blockchain.
👍  
properties (23)
authortimcliff
permlinkre-evolved08gsr-re-timcliff-steem-bandwidth-user-experience-issue-20180111t182227162z
categorybandwidth
json_metadata{"tags":["bandwidth"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-01-11 18:22:27
last_update2018-01-11 18:22:27
depth2
children4
last_payout2018-01-18 18:22:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.032 HBD
curator_payout_value0.008 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length121
author_reputation272,954,445,077,789
root_title"Steem Bandwidth - User Experience Issue"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id28,816,613
net_rshares5,743,318,746
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@evolved08gsr ·
$0.15
Right.. so more servers getting paid to run a local copy of the blockchain would mean that there are more servers with more capacity (because they can afford to upgrade the RAM / HDD if they're getting paid) ... How is that not how it works?
👍  
properties (23)
authorevolved08gsr
permlinkre-timcliff-re-evolved08gsr-re-timcliff-steem-bandwidth-user-experience-issue-20180111t182643489z
categorybandwidth
json_metadata{"tags":["bandwidth"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-01-11 18:26:42
last_update2018-01-11 18:26:42
depth3
children3
last_payout2018-01-18 18:26:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.112 HBD
curator_payout_value0.033 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length241
author_reputation4,411,583,250,238
root_title"Steem Bandwidth - User Experience Issue"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id28,817,403
net_rshares18,619,270,094
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@timcliff ·
The witnesses can pay for their servers, yes - but third party developers and exchanges must pay for theirs out of pocket. 

Adding more witnesses doesn’t really help.
properties (22)
authortimcliff
permlinkre-evolved08gsr-re-timcliff-re-evolved08gsr-re-timcliff-steem-bandwidth-user-experience-issue-20180111t191337296z
categorybandwidth
json_metadata{"tags":["bandwidth"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-01-11 19:13:36
last_update2018-01-11 19:13:36
depth4
children2
last_payout2018-01-18 19:13:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length167
author_reputation272,954,445,077,789
root_title"Steem Bandwidth - User Experience Issue"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id28,826,077
net_rshares0
@evolved08gsr · (edited)
So in effect, if there are more witnesses, there are more paid servers/nodes, with higher bandwidth capabilities, and therefore a more stable network.

Developers have no incentive to keep their nodes online when they are simply testing. They can download the Blockchain at a point in time and run with that as their test environment. Until they roll out a production version of code, they have little to no incentive for running a full node and paying the associated expenses.
properties (22)
authorevolved08gsr
permlinkre-timcliff-re-evolved08gsr-re-timcliff-re-evolved08gsr-re-timcliff-steem-bandwidth-user-experience-issue-20180111t200636686z
categorybandwidth
json_metadata{"tags":["bandwidth"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-01-11 20:06:36
last_update2018-01-11 20:07:09
depth5
children1
last_payout2018-01-18 20:06:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length477
author_reputation4,411,583,250,238
root_title"Steem Bandwidth - User Experience Issue"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id28,835,831
net_rshares0