create account

RE: Steem Bandwidth - User Experience Issue by timcliff

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @isnochys/re-timcliff-steem-bandwidth-user-experience-issue-20180109t044824387z

· @timcliff ·
The reason for this is explained in the post.
properties (22)
authortimcliff
permlinkre-isnochys-re-timcliff-steem-bandwidth-user-experience-issue-20180109t050345055z
categorybandwidth
json_metadata{"tags":["bandwidth"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-01-09 05:03:45
last_update2018-01-09 05:03:45
depth2
children4
last_payout2018-01-16 05:03:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length45
author_reputation272,954,445,077,789
root_title"Steem Bandwidth - User Experience Issue"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id28,167,725
net_rshares0
@isnochys ·
Sorry, yeah you are right.
But in my opinion it should not change. Fixed amount of bandwidth per SP.
Otherwise whales can censor the system. And users can calculate how much they are using. Otherwise it is just random. 
And with 150kb a  new user can vote 1 time.. And that's it for an hour.
Also if that user has one open order on the internal market, all his bandwidth is gone.
And how ist it calculated?
To this point all I hear is just.. Well lots of activity. But how is it determined?
properties (22)
authorisnochys
permlinkre-timcliff-re-isnochys-re-timcliff-steem-bandwidth-user-experience-issue-20180109t051455057z
categorybandwidth
json_metadata{"tags":["bandwidth"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-01-09 05:15:00
last_update2018-01-09 05:15:00
depth3
children3
last_payout2018-01-16 05:15:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length490
author_reputation47,828,575,809,450
root_title"Steem Bandwidth - User Experience Issue"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id28,169,698
net_rshares0
@timcliff ·
There is not enough bandwidth for everyone to just have a fixed amount. The limited bandwidth needs to be divided up amongst whoever is active at the time.
properties (22)
authortimcliff
permlinkre-isnochys-re-timcliff-re-isnochys-re-timcliff-steem-bandwidth-user-experience-issue-20180109t061113742z
categorybandwidth
json_metadata{"tags":["bandwidth"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-01-09 06:11:12
last_update2018-01-09 06:11:12
depth4
children2
last_payout2018-01-16 06:11:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length155
author_reputation272,954,445,077,789
root_title"Steem Bandwidth - User Experience Issue"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id28,178,911
net_rshares0
@isnochys ·
Hmm.. That sounds to me, as if in regards to bandwidth, steem is not able to scale. Currently there are 50k active users, those are not even active at the same time, yet everybody says, steem needs more users, but the blockchain doesn't react so well, from user pov.
And why is there not enough bandwidth?
What determines this 'enough'?
properties (22)
authorisnochys
permlinkre-timcliff-re-isnochys-re-timcliff-re-isnochys-re-timcliff-steem-bandwidth-user-experience-issue-20180109t061841593z
categorybandwidth
json_metadata{"tags":["bandwidth"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2018-01-09 06:18:48
last_update2018-01-09 06:18:48
depth5
children1
last_payout2018-01-16 06:18:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length336
author_reputation47,828,575,809,450
root_title"Steem Bandwidth - User Experience Issue"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id28,180,199
net_rshares0