Viewing a response to: @isnochys/re-timcliff-steem-bandwidth-user-experience-issue-20180109t044824387z
The reason for this is explained in the post.
author | timcliff |
---|---|
permlink | re-isnochys-re-timcliff-steem-bandwidth-user-experience-issue-20180109t050345055z |
category | bandwidth |
json_metadata | {"tags":["bandwidth"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2018-01-09 05:03:45 |
last_update | 2018-01-09 05:03:45 |
depth | 2 |
children | 4 |
last_payout | 2018-01-16 05:03:45 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 45 |
author_reputation | 272,954,445,077,789 |
root_title | "Steem Bandwidth - User Experience Issue" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 28,167,725 |
net_rshares | 0 |
Sorry, yeah you are right. But in my opinion it should not change. Fixed amount of bandwidth per SP. Otherwise whales can censor the system. And users can calculate how much they are using. Otherwise it is just random. And with 150kb a new user can vote 1 time.. And that's it for an hour. Also if that user has one open order on the internal market, all his bandwidth is gone. And how ist it calculated? To this point all I hear is just.. Well lots of activity. But how is it determined?
author | isnochys |
---|---|
permlink | re-timcliff-re-isnochys-re-timcliff-steem-bandwidth-user-experience-issue-20180109t051455057z |
category | bandwidth |
json_metadata | {"tags":["bandwidth"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2018-01-09 05:15:00 |
last_update | 2018-01-09 05:15:00 |
depth | 3 |
children | 3 |
last_payout | 2018-01-16 05:15:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 490 |
author_reputation | 47,828,575,809,450 |
root_title | "Steem Bandwidth - User Experience Issue" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 28,169,698 |
net_rshares | 0 |
There is not enough bandwidth for everyone to just have a fixed amount. The limited bandwidth needs to be divided up amongst whoever is active at the time.
author | timcliff |
---|---|
permlink | re-isnochys-re-timcliff-re-isnochys-re-timcliff-steem-bandwidth-user-experience-issue-20180109t061113742z |
category | bandwidth |
json_metadata | {"tags":["bandwidth"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2018-01-09 06:11:12 |
last_update | 2018-01-09 06:11:12 |
depth | 4 |
children | 2 |
last_payout | 2018-01-16 06:11:12 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 155 |
author_reputation | 272,954,445,077,789 |
root_title | "Steem Bandwidth - User Experience Issue" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 28,178,911 |
net_rshares | 0 |
Hmm.. That sounds to me, as if in regards to bandwidth, steem is not able to scale. Currently there are 50k active users, those are not even active at the same time, yet everybody says, steem needs more users, but the blockchain doesn't react so well, from user pov. And why is there not enough bandwidth? What determines this 'enough'?
author | isnochys |
---|---|
permlink | re-timcliff-re-isnochys-re-timcliff-re-isnochys-re-timcliff-steem-bandwidth-user-experience-issue-20180109t061841593z |
category | bandwidth |
json_metadata | {"tags":["bandwidth"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2018-01-09 06:18:48 |
last_update | 2018-01-09 06:18:48 |
depth | 5 |
children | 1 |
last_payout | 2018-01-16 06:18:48 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 336 |
author_reputation | 47,828,575,809,450 |
root_title | "Steem Bandwidth - User Experience Issue" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 28,180,199 |
net_rshares | 0 |