create account

RE: @berniesanders vs. @haejin: 481 Accounts That Only Vote For @haejin - A blockchain investigation by jaki01

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @pandorasbox/re-jaredcwillis-berniesanders-vs-haejin-481-shill-accounts-a-blockchain-investigation-20171227t170214231z

· @jaki01 ·
How would you define 'active'? Aren't spammers 'active' as well?
👍  ,
properties (23)
authorjaki01
permlinkre-pandorasbox-re-jaredcwillis-berniesanders-vs-haejin-481-shill-accounts-a-blockchain-investigation-20171228t181333135z
categoryberniesanders
json_metadata{"tags":["berniesanders"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-12-28 18:13:33
last_update2017-12-28 18:13:33
depth2
children0
last_payout2018-01-04 18:13:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length64
author_reputation543,080,602,374,214
root_title"@berniesanders vs. @haejin: 481 Accounts That Only Vote For @haejin - A blockchain investigation"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id25,733,026
net_rshares1,503,698,367
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)