>Whirlpool results in 512 bit hashes, which would be doubling SHA256’s size. Considering how precious storage is on the blockchain, I do not believe it would be worst using Whirlpool unless it gave some significant advantage I am not aware of.

Think you mean worth not worst.

Excellent article. When I get my voting power back, will be back to vote.

I want to find an article that breaks down the hashing algorithm operations into mathematical terms that a layperson can understand. You layed out the high level quite well. Thank you