Viewing a response to: @calaber24p/why-two-blockchains-end-up-being-worth-more-than-one
I want to understand fully but I don't think I do. Are you saying a shift in buying of one cryptocurrency ultimately causes a decrease in another cryptocurrency/all of the cryptocurrencies, unless there's say some large investment going into one of the currencies to float the price?
| author | sammarkjames |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-calaber24p-why-two-blockchains-end-up-being-worth-more-than-one-20170930t170056211z |
| category | bitcoin |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["bitcoin"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| created | 2017-09-30 17:00:57 |
| last_update | 2017-09-30 17:01:18 |
| depth | 1 |
| children | 2 |
| last_payout | 2017-10-07 17:00:57 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.041 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.013 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 285 |
| author_reputation | 7,423,688,274,183 |
| root_title | "Why Two Blockchains End Up Being Worth More Than One" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 16,394,520 |
| net_rshares | 20,144,871,328 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| calaber24p | 0 | 20,144,871,328 | 14% |
I think ultimately it is people pumping outside money into one side after the fork as a form of speech.
| author | calaber24p |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-sammarkjames-re-calaber24p-why-two-blockchains-end-up-being-worth-more-than-one-20171001t202417781z |
| category | bitcoin |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["bitcoin"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| created | 2017-10-01 20:24:18 |
| last_update | 2017-10-01 20:24:18 |
| depth | 2 |
| children | 1 |
| last_payout | 2017-10-08 20:24:18 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 103 |
| author_reputation | 313,033,964,963,339 |
| root_title | "Why Two Blockchains End Up Being Worth More Than One" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 16,504,335 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
Ok, I get you, it's definitely an interesting/likely theory...
| author | sammarkjames |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-calaber24p-re-sammarkjames-re-calaber24p-why-two-blockchains-end-up-being-worth-more-than-one-20171001t204816632z |
| category | bitcoin |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["bitcoin"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| created | 2017-10-01 20:48:15 |
| last_update | 2017-10-01 20:48:15 |
| depth | 3 |
| children | 0 |
| last_payout | 2017-10-08 20:48:15 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 62 |
| author_reputation | 7,423,688,274,183 |
| root_title | "Why Two Blockchains End Up Being Worth More Than One" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 16,505,803 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
hiveblocks