create account

RE: Simple Side-chaining for Graphene-based Blockchains (BitShares/PeerPlays/Steem) by rick-marches

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @publicworker/re-xeroc-simple-side-chaining-for-graphene-based-blockchains-bitsharespeerplayssteem-20160625t093356362z

· @rick-marches ·
Hi publicworker, would you summarize how this proposal works? is it trustless, trully decentrilized or a kind of multisig? I always scared of spending too many times reading tech geek thing that does not solve any problem, 
I cannot see a reason to lock btc/eth (only asset worth lock) to give it in bts blockchain, even there is no scalability issue........ even if projects build on graphene, issued n traded in dex could interoperate in a plug n play way it does not make sense what benefit could be gained for value, volume, adoption......I dont see a reason either a proposal that reasonable or that makes some sense to put a work for it over the tables, the benefits are not worth in my opinion, but this is just a opinion of a pratical averajoe that does not have interest for fancy things but for. solutions that drives adoption n make useful n needed
properties (22)
authorrick-marches
permlinkre-publicworker-re-xeroc-simple-side-chaining-for-graphene-based-blockchains-bitsharespeerplayssteem-20160625t230109665z
categorybitshares
json_metadata{"tags":["bitshares"]}
created2016-06-25 23:01:12
last_update2016-06-25 23:01:12
depth2
children0
last_payout2016-08-23 13:14:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length859
author_reputation13,657,520,017
root_title"Simple Side-chaining for Graphene-based Blockchains (BitShares/PeerPlays/Steem)"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id43,921
net_rshares0