Viewing a response to: @dantheman/how-to-process-100m-transfers-second-on-a-single-blockchain
> if we add a few small constraints on the problem it can easily become trivially parallel. That's incredibly beautiful, and (to me) a bit counterintuitive. Maybe it feels natural to someone who's used to thinking about the nuts and bolts of computation, but it's not what I immediately would have expected. Good post!
author | biophil |
---|---|
permlink | re-dantheman-how-to-process-100m-transfers-second-on-a-single-blockchain-20161202t005054696z |
category | blockchain |
json_metadata | {"tags":["blockchain"]} |
created | 2016-12-02 00:50:54 |
last_update | 2016-12-02 00:50:54 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-01-02 05:18:54 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 319 |
author_reputation | 45,223,914,794,461 |
root_title | "How to Process 100M Transfers / Second on a Single Blockchain" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 1,894,019 |
net_rshares | 0 |