create account

RE: On Blockchains and Men by edicted

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @greer184/on-blockchains-and-men

· @edicted ·
>You don't own your data on a blockchain because everyone running a node gets access to it. Once you publish the data, it's fair game.

Only if the network says so.  I assume you are talking about blogging combined with optional tips here.  If you were talking about an RPG game you'd for sure own your character and all the items you farmed and everything else, and you'd be able to sell them at a profit without having to worry about tips.  You'd get paid the fair market price (better or worse depending on time, supply, and demand). 

If I send Bitcoin to someone... everyone gets that information, but all that information says is that I transferred Bitcoin from one person to another. 

Ah whatever you know all this already.  People do overhype blockchain and act like it's a silver bullet that's going to solve all problems.  No argument there. 
👍  
properties (23)
authoredicted
permlinkre-greer184-qfe3nx
categoryblockchain
json_metadata{"tags":["blockchain"],"app":"peakd/2020.08.3"}
created2020-08-21 01:19:09
last_update2020-08-21 01:19:09
depth1
children1
last_payout2020-08-28 01:19:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length853
author_reputation3,497,851,531,456,337
root_title"On Blockchains and Men"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id99,183,720
net_rshares50,506,967,965
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@greer184 ·
$0.02
Data ownership is about access and privacy. So, a user having the power to share their data in different ways. Maybe they share only with a group of trusted friends via encrypted messages. Maybe they share the keys to that information with a little more. Maybe they would rather not risk the encrypted data go to certain people, so they localize how that data is released. The information being referenced here is rather general -> data where personal access control is desirable. There are some use cases where certain assets may be completely desirable not to be transparent, yet utilize encryption, security, and decentralization to make certain guarantees on that data.

I'm fine with Bitcoin transactions being public and global as that transparency enhances the product and allows anyone to validate the public state of all Bitcoin which is important for being money, but other things outside the money domain perhaps not so much.
👍  ,
properties (23)
authorgreer184
permlinkre-edicted-qfftfu
categoryblockchain
json_metadata{"tags":["blockchain"],"app":"peakd/2020.08.3"}
created2020-08-21 23:33:30
last_update2020-08-21 23:33:30
depth2
children0
last_payout2020-08-28 23:33:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.014 HBD
curator_payout_value0.008 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length936
author_reputation12,340,680,341,190
root_title"On Blockchains and Men"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id99,201,681
net_rshares130,901,139,961
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)