Viewing a response to: @faddat/re-thecryptofiend-re-timcliff-re-dantheman-how-to-process-100m-transfers-second-on-a-single-blockchain-20161202t115348195z
OK cool. I am also wondering if we could take some of the ethereum thunder with regards to "smart contracts" too. We have the speed and scaling - which they have not yet fixed and from what I am reading there seems to be a loss of confidence in their blockchain overall. I'm not being mean to ethereum but it seems there is an opportunity there right now.
author | thecryptofiend |
---|---|
permlink | re-faddat-re-thecryptofiend-re-timcliff-re-dantheman-how-to-process-100m-transfers-second-on-a-single-blockchain-20161202t131555902z |
category | blockchain |
json_metadata | {"tags":["blockchain"]} |
created | 2016-12-02 13:15:54 |
last_update | 2016-12-02 13:15:54 |
depth | 4 |
children | 1 |
last_payout | 2017-01-02 05:18:54 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 358 |
author_reputation | 323,603,913,866,384 |
root_title | "How to Process 100M Transfers / Second on a Single Blockchain" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 1,897,840 |
net_rshares | 0 |
I must toss out an alternate view. I've been a critic of steem-- but I hope, a "known friendly" critic. I say this because I now feel compelled to compare to ethereum. AFAIK, ethereum, and thus "ether" the "gas" that pays for transactions.... both do a grand total of nothing at all. Really. So here's my reply on that: I do not think that we want any of that thunder. For more on some pretty awesome stuff, have a look into these things, comparatively: * Graphene * Tendermint * Hyperledger From my limited (but-limited-knowledge-puts-me-in the top 1% of programmers for comparative blockchain knowledge and top .001% of humans for the same) knowledge, I want to say that there are way better things on the horizon. G, TM, and HL all share some common points. There's an incredible discussion occurring here: https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos/issues/43
author | faddat |
---|---|
permlink | re-thecryptofiend-re-faddat-re-thecryptofiend-re-timcliff-re-dantheman-how-to-process-100m-transfers-second-on-a-single-blockchain-20161202t181942270z |
category | blockchain |
json_metadata | {"tags":["blockchain"],"links":["https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos/issues/43"]} |
created | 2016-12-02 18:19:21 |
last_update | 2016-12-02 18:19:21 |
depth | 5 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-01-02 05:18:54 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.511 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.169 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 870 |
author_reputation | 36,581,868,473,026 |
root_title | "How to Process 100M Transfers / Second on a Single Blockchain" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 1,899,930 |
net_rshares | 7,358,804,047,282 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
wackou | 0 | 7,322,163,420,013 | 100% | ||
thecryptofiend | 0 | 13,014,728,002 | 1% | ||
igster | 0 | 23,625,899,267 | 100% |