create account

RE: How to Process 100M Transfers / Second on a Single Blockchain by thecryptofiend

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @faddat/re-thecryptofiend-re-timcliff-re-dantheman-how-to-process-100m-transfers-second-on-a-single-blockchain-20161202t115348195z

· @thecryptofiend ·
OK cool.  I am also wondering if we could take some of the ethereum thunder with regards to "smart contracts" too.  We have the speed and scaling - which they have not yet fixed and from what I am reading there seems to be a loss of confidence in their blockchain overall.  I'm not being mean to ethereum but it seems there is an opportunity there right now.
properties (22)
authorthecryptofiend
permlinkre-faddat-re-thecryptofiend-re-timcliff-re-dantheman-how-to-process-100m-transfers-second-on-a-single-blockchain-20161202t131555902z
categoryblockchain
json_metadata{"tags":["blockchain"]}
created2016-12-02 13:15:54
last_update2016-12-02 13:15:54
depth4
children1
last_payout2017-01-02 05:18:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length358
author_reputation323,603,913,866,384
root_title"How to Process 100M Transfers / Second on a Single Blockchain"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,897,840
net_rshares0
@faddat ·
$0.68
I must toss out an alternate view.  

I've been a critic of steem-- but I hope, a "known friendly" critic.  I say this because I now feel compelled to compare to ethereum.  AFAIK, ethereum, and thus "ether" the "gas" that pays for transactions.... both do a grand total of nothing at all.  Really.  

So here's my reply on that:  I do not think that we want any of that thunder.  For more on some pretty awesome stuff, have a look into these things, comparatively:

* Graphene
* Tendermint
* Hyperledger

From my limited (but-limited-knowledge-puts-me-in the top 1% of programmers for comparative blockchain knowledge and top .001% of humans for the same) knowledge, I want to say that there are way better things on the horizon.  G, TM, and HL all share some common points.  There's an incredible discussion occurring here:  

https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos/issues/43
👍  , ,
properties (23)
authorfaddat
permlinkre-thecryptofiend-re-faddat-re-thecryptofiend-re-timcliff-re-dantheman-how-to-process-100m-transfers-second-on-a-single-blockchain-20161202t181942270z
categoryblockchain
json_metadata{"tags":["blockchain"],"links":["https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos/issues/43"]}
created2016-12-02 18:19:21
last_update2016-12-02 18:19:21
depth5
children0
last_payout2017-01-02 05:18:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.511 HBD
curator_payout_value0.169 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length870
author_reputation36,581,868,473,026
root_title"How to Process 100M Transfers / Second on a Single Blockchain"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id1,899,930
net_rshares7,358,804,047,282
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)