Viewing a response to: @dan/s4p079
I’ve noticed in your past blockchain projects, like what became Hive, the use of an ‘extensions’ array at the end of definitions, which provided flexibility for future enhancements, such as the addition of ‘beneficiaries’ in the ‘comment’ object. Has this experience influenced your approach to data structure design in FracPack? Is that what you're referring to by "extended fields," here?
author | inertia |
---|---|
permlink | re-dan-s4p0uf |
category | blog |
json_metadata | {"tags":["blog"],"app":"peakd/2023.11.2"} |
created | 2023-11-25 19:01:27 |
last_update | 2023-11-25 19:01:27 |
depth | 3 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2023-12-02 19:01:27 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 390 |
author_reputation | 346,568,901,399,561 |
root_title | "Presenting FracPack - A Better Zero-copy Binary Serialization Format for C++ and Rust" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 129,163,887 |
net_rshares | 0 |