create account

RE: It has come to my attention that I need to explain things a little more...and this is better! by lucylin

View this thread on: hive.blog |  peakd.com |  ecency.com

Viewing a response to: @dexterdumb/re-lucylin-it-has-come-to-my-attention-that-i-need-to-explain-things-a-little-more-and-this-is-better-20190314t011004056z

blog · @lucylin ·
$0.05
MMMmmmmm......I dunno....I DO know without property being the consideration when writing code - it will not stand .... (no concept property, no ethics).
👍  
properties (23)
authorlucylin
permlinkre-dexterdumb-re-lucylin-it-has-come-to-my-attention-that-i-need-to-explain-things-a-little-more-and-this-is-better-20190314t015353332z
categoryblog
json_metadata{"tags":["blog"],"community":"steempeak","app":"steempeak/1.8.4b"}
created2019-03-14 01:54:15
last_update2019-03-14 01:54:15
depth2
children9
last_payout2019-03-21 01:54:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.034 HBD
curator_payout_value0.011 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length152
author_reputation185,811,362,824,733
root_title"It has come to my attention that I need to explain things a little more...and this is better!"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id81,271,716
net_rshares68,497,638,888
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@dexterdumb · (edited)
$0.04
Correct me if I still don't understand completely.  Most crypto projects tout the fact that they are open source, meaning those who are capable and willing, can contribute and see how exactly the source code works.  NEO/BTC etc....Closed source (private property) are your Microsoft's/Apple/IBM's.
When writing code with the intention of making it private, you become no longer "open source".  Is this what you mean?
👍  , ,
properties (23)
authordexterdumb
permlinkre-lucylin-re-dexterdumb-re-lucylin-it-has-come-to-my-attention-that-i-need-to-explain-things-a-little-more-and-this-is-better-20190316t033806898z
categoryblog
json_metadata{"tags":["blog"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2019-03-16 03:38:06
last_update2019-03-16 03:38:45
depth3
children8
last_payout2019-03-23 03:38:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.028 HBD
curator_payout_value0.008 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length416
author_reputation2,492,649,115,795
root_title"It has come to my attention that I need to explain things a little more...and this is better!"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id81,390,362
net_rshares57,105,987,781
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@lucylin · (edited)
$0.02
It might be...if I understood what you meant..lol

I mean that the rewards pool as it stands, is no ones property - therefore taking it - however you can - is acceptable.
Without an ethical code in the system (code) there are no ethics.
There can be no theft,  or deception, or cheating....these are ethics.
IF the reward pool belongs to no one -(which I think is correct) then  any actions becomes acceptable - to take a slice,  there is no 'right, wrong, good bad' - just whatever you can get, _however_ you can get it...

Law of the jungle is not a structure that will endure - except as a financial instrument to make profit of price action.
In the 'new world' structure - this is an incorrect model -  this is exactly what _we are all_  railing against...Non ethical structures.
👍  
properties (23)
authorlucylin
permlinkre-dexterdumb-re-lucylin-re-dexterdumb-re-lucylin-it-has-come-to-my-attention-that-i-need-to-explain-things-a-little-more-and-this-is-better-20190316t040611856z
categoryblog
json_metadata{"tags":["blog"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2019-03-16 04:06:24
last_update2019-03-16 04:07:12
depth4
children7
last_payout2019-03-23 04:06:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.016 HBD
curator_payout_value0.005 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length783
author_reputation185,811,362,824,733
root_title"It has come to my attention that I need to explain things a little more...and this is better!"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id81,391,089
net_rshares34,537,029,522
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@dexterdumb ·
$0.06
I think it's a very fine line.  Not that it's not worth examining.  Just seems difficult to unwind it all.  I don't necessarily think that making the reward pool privately distributed makes it "closed source" anyway.
👍  , ,
properties (23)
authordexterdumb
permlinkre-lucylin-re-dexterdumb-re-lucylin-re-dexterdumb-re-lucylin-it-has-come-to-my-attention-that-i-need-to-explain-things-a-little-more-and-this-is-better-20190317t235915397z
categoryblog
json_metadata{"tags":["blog"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2019-03-17 23:59:15
last_update2019-03-17 23:59:15
depth5
children6
last_payout2019-03-24 23:59:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.043 HBD
curator_payout_value0.013 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length216
author_reputation2,492,649,115,795
root_title"It has come to my attention that I need to explain things a little more...and this is better!"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id81,488,737
net_rshares85,548,361,592
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
Help/Feedback