create account

RE: Should Comments Have Their Own Reward Pool? by schattenjaeger

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @beanz/re-schattenjaeger-re-beanz-should-comments-have-their-own-reward-pool-20170113t142633293z

· @schattenjaeger · (edited)
Minnows don't, but the reason people are here doing anything are the whale votes. And they whales vote when their is a monetary incentive.

And I doubt they will go comment hunting when there's no money to be made. The end result is that we will be earning 38% less for our posts.
properties (22)
authorschattenjaeger
permlinkre-beanz-re-schattenjaeger-re-beanz-should-comments-have-their-own-reward-pool-20170113t143348267z
categorycomments
json_metadata{"tags":["comments"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-01-13 14:34:03
last_update2017-01-13 14:34:21
depth3
children5
last_payout2017-02-13 15:25:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length280
author_reputation132,607,893,972,093
root_title"Should Comments Have Their Own Reward Pool?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,236,830
net_rshares0
@beanz ·
$1.41
> The end result is that we will be earning 38% less for our posts.

I would be OK with that because more rewards for commenters has the potential to bring many more users since there are more commenters than writers in the world.  Bringing more users would increase demand for steem and the price would go up.
👍  ,
properties (23)
authorbeanz
permlinkre-schattenjaeger-re-beanz-re-schattenjaeger-re-beanz-should-comments-have-their-own-reward-pool-20170113t144016763z
categorycomments
json_metadata{"tags":["comments"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-01-13 14:40:27
last_update2017-01-13 14:40:27
depth4
children4
last_payout2017-02-13 15:25:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value1.055 HBD
curator_payout_value0.351 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length310
author_reputation77,215,574,122,930
root_title"Should Comments Have Their Own Reward Pool?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,236,865
net_rshares13,444,684,749,183
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@professorx ·
true, since right now the commenters are basically the writers too
properties (22)
authorprofessorx
permlinkre-beanz-re-schattenjaeger-re-beanz-re-schattenjaeger-re-beanz-should-comments-have-their-own-reward-pool-20170113t174916454z
categorycomments
json_metadata{"tags":["comments"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-01-13 17:49:15
last_update2017-01-13 17:49:15
depth5
children0
last_payout2017-02-13 15:25:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length66
author_reputation2,328,048,423,342
root_title"Should Comments Have Their Own Reward Pool?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,238,140
net_rshares0
@schattenjaeger ·
That is true. But I'm not convinced that the comments would earn much. And less rewards for posts will drive existing members away.

I'd be happy to be proven wrong, since what keeps me hooked on Facebook are the conversations, and right now Steemit is not that social of a social media, but I see potential problems.
properties (22)
authorschattenjaeger
permlinkre-beanz-re-schattenjaeger-re-beanz-re-schattenjaeger-re-beanz-should-comments-have-their-own-reward-pool-20170113t145100791z
categorycomments
json_metadata{"tags":["comments"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-01-13 14:51:15
last_update2017-01-13 14:51:15
depth5
children1
last_payout2017-02-13 15:25:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length317
author_reputation132,607,893,972,093
root_title"Should Comments Have Their Own Reward Pool?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,236,912
net_rshares0
@beanz ·
According to the developers they would make 38 times what they are making now... That might be a bit much but not if we suddenly get a lot more users...
👍  
properties (23)
authorbeanz
permlinkre-schattenjaeger-re-beanz-re-schattenjaeger-re-beanz-re-schattenjaeger-re-beanz-should-comments-have-their-own-reward-pool-20170113t150005213z
categorycomments
json_metadata{"tags":["comments"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-01-13 15:00:12
last_update2017-01-13 15:00:12
depth6
children0
last_payout2017-02-13 15:25:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length152
author_reputation77,215,574,122,930
root_title"Should Comments Have Their Own Reward Pool?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,236,962
net_rshares661,340,194,059
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@schattenjaeger ·
Yes, I'm more than willing to give it a shot. There are a lot of people on Facebook who rarely, if ever, make their own posts, but comment on other people's posts frequently. And maybe when outsiders run into Steemit posts, they have a comment in mind they would like to make, and *if* comments are being rewarded in a significant way, they get interested in joining Steemit.

So, I'm not trying to be opposed to change for the sake of.

I'm just skeptical.

But like I said before, more engagement is good. Currently, Steemit attracts content creators, and that is the reason for the lack of comments, since people are mostly occupied with their own content, waiting for the upvotes to come. Most of the people on the internet are content consumers, so there's a huge group of people that Steemit is not drawing to the platform right now.

I guess curation rewards for comments could skew the conversations when comments from certain users would get autovoted every time.

In that sense, I agree with the changes.

I will take a wait and see approach. But I'm reserved.
👍  
properties (23)
authorschattenjaeger
permlinkre-beanz-re-schattenjaeger-re-beanz-re-schattenjaeger-re-beanz-should-comments-have-their-own-reward-pool-20170113t160452601z
categorycomments
json_metadata{"tags":["comments"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-01-13 16:05:06
last_update2017-01-13 16:05:06
depth5
children0
last_payout2017-02-13 15:25:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,070
author_reputation132,607,893,972,093
root_title"Should Comments Have Their Own Reward Pool?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,237,421
net_rshares50,032,018,965
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)