RE: Part 2 of Our Plan to Onboard the Masses by richardcrill

View this thread on: hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

Viewing a response to: @richardcrill/pvy6v9

communities · @richardcrill · Aug 9 '19 (edited)

Or a better way to put that question: why not just use delegation and curation guilds instead of bid bots? Bid bots are what undermines the trending page. So shouldn't we focus on solutions that don't undermine the trending page and the whole idea of curation in the first place?

properties (22)

`author`	richardcrill
`permlink`	pvy7cu
`category`	communities
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["communities"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2019-08-09 02:38:54
`last_update`	2019-08-09 03:00:30
`depth`	6
`children`	8
`last_payout`	2019-08-16 02:38:54
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	279
`author_reputation`	55,974,657,421,087
`root_title`	"Part 2 of Our Plan to Onboard the Masses"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	89,315,381
`net_rshares`	0

@valued-customer · Aug 9 '19

$0.03

Before bidbots were selfvoters and circle jerks.  @haejin and @ranchorelaxo, for example.  @berniesanders for another.  Bots aren't the source of evil, they just automate it.

👍 kawaiicrush

`author`	valued-customer
`permlink`	re-richardcrill-pvydjb
`category`	communities
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["communities"],"app":"steempeak/1.14.12"}
`created`	2019-08-09 04:52:27
`last_update`	2019-08-09 04:52:27
`depth`	7
`children`	7
`last_payout`	2019-08-16 04:52:27
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.024 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.008 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	174
`author_reputation`	358,962,024,866,226
`root_title`	"Part 2 of Our Plan to Onboard the Masses"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	89,318,886
`net_rshares`	98,187,252,838
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
kawaiicrush	0 B		98,187,252,838	100%

@joe.public · Aug 12 '19

i think the  @ranchorelaxo account was part of the @ngc @berniesanders group of accounts. 
his intelligence has some flaws that look like gaping holes

👍 kawaiicrush, valued-customer
👎 abusereports, iflagtrash

`author`	joe.public
`permlink`	pw592b
`category`	communities
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["communities"],"users":["ranchorelaxo","ngc","berniesanders"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2019-08-12 21:59:00
`last_update`	2019-08-12 21:59:00
`depth`	8
`children`	4
`last_payout`	2019-08-19 21:59:00
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	150
`author_reputation`	-6,029,891,516,751
`root_title`	"Part 2 of Our Plan to Onboard the Masses"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	89,455,065
`net_rshares`	-55,382,351,635
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (4)

voter	rshares	pct
iflagtrash	-20,095,611,744	-2%
valued-customer	11,349,003,954	25%
abusereports	-100,296,937,645	-2%
kawaiicrush	53,661,193,800	100%

@abusereports · Aug 12 '19

$0.32

# YOU ARE ON THE NAUGHTY LIST. YOU HAVE BEEN FLAGGED.  GOODBYE.

👍 z8teyb289qav9z, abusereports, ngc, berniesanders, sirvotesalot, thecyclist, nextgencrypto, stimialiti, lyndsayblowes

`author`	abusereports
`permlink`	abusereports-re-joe-publicpw592b
`category`	communities
`json_metadata`	""
`created`	2019-08-12 21:59:12
`last_update`	2019-08-12 21:59:12
`depth`	9
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2019-08-19 21:59:12
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.239 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.079 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	63
`author_reputation`	199,407,425,243,286
`root_title`	"Part 2 of Our Plan to Onboard the Masses"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	89,455,076
`net_rshares`	935,964,015,162
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (9)

voter	rshares	pct
berniesanders	66,992,609,892	5%
nextgencrypto	2,602,184,161	5%
thecyclist	7,317,875,192	5%
stimialiti	1,724,738,292	1%
ngc	219,755,619,787	5%
sirvotesalot	28,228,058,266	5%
z8teyb289qav9z	365,155,922,938	5%
abusereports	243,748,007,390	5%
lyndsayblowes	438,999,244	5%

@valued-customer · Aug 12 '19 (edited)

If you look back in steemd you see that @ranchorelaxo was @haejin's bank, and Bernie was at war with @haejin.  That's my recollection of the affair anyway.  If you mean that the whole conflict was made for TV, then I would be suitably impressed by the cunning such a pretense would reveal.

Edit: also, please don't bring up gaping holes in this context.  I.. I just can't even...

👍 joe.public

`author`	valued-customer
`permlink`	re-joepublic-pw5b9v
`category`	communities
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["communities"],"app":"steempeak/1.14.15"}
`created`	2019-08-12 22:46:57
`last_update`	2019-08-12 22:49:57
`depth`	9
`children`	2
`last_payout`	2019-08-19 22:46:57
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	380
`author_reputation`	358,962,024,866,226
`root_title`	"Part 2 of Our Plan to Onboard the Masses"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	89,456,386
`net_rshares`	5,901,466,739
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
joe.public	0 B		5,901,466,739	100%

2 replies

@richardcrill · Aug 9 '19

@berniesanders actually made the first bid bot. But yes circle jerking is another seperate problem. Because there are other problems, does that mean it's not worth trying stop this problem?

👍 valued-customer

`author`	richardcrill
`permlink`	pvz2jd
`category`	communities
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["communities"],"users":["berniesanders"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2019-08-09 13:52:24
`last_update`	2019-08-09 13:52:24
`depth`	8
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2019-08-16 13:52:24
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	189
`author_reputation`	55,974,657,421,087
`root_title`	"Part 2 of Our Plan to Onboard the Masses"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	89,333,058
`net_rshares`	11,436,988,003
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
valued-customer	0 B		11,436,988,003	25%

@valued-customer · Aug 9 '19

I'm aware of @randowhale.  All I'm saying is that plugging one hole just forces leaks to come out of others.  I'm an original advocate of preventing all bots from voting, and have posted how this can be done.  

Even though selfvoting and circlejerks would still be a problem, that problem would at least be something actual people did, rather than devices.  I reckon infesting social networks with bots devalues people, and find that more offensive than financial problems themselves.

properties (22)