RE: Issues With Using Stake To Filter Content by greer184

View this thread on: hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

Viewing a response to: @doodlebear/re-greer184-issues-with-using-stake-to-filter-content-20180219t134358984z

content · @greer184 · Feb 19 '18

$0.02

Resteem bots are an interesting idea, but the issue with those is that they can overrun your feed. But they can clean out some of the junk and pollution through cross-tagging. But you could incorporate those with additional filters to create some interesting feeds. Or you could find a way to extract the posts from those bots and build an application on top of those bots. 

I foresee that some curation organizations will develop in the future such that they simply resteem content, but spend copious amounts of time looking for specific posts, hire qualified writers, etc.

👍 doodlebear

`author`	greer184
`permlink`	re-doodlebear-re-greer184-issues-with-using-stake-to-filter-content-20180219t194038130z
`category`	content
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["content"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2018-02-19 19:40:39
`last_update`	2018-02-19 19:40:39
`depth`	2
`children`	2
`last_payout`	2018-02-26 19:40:39
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.018 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.003 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	575
`author_reputation`	12,340,680,341,190
`root_title`	"Issues With Using Stake To Filter Content"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	38,868,170
`net_rshares`	4,540,830,848
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
doodlebear	0 B		4,540,830,848	16%

@doodlebear · Feb 19 '18 (edited)

Yes, the problem of getting overran is always there. I would try to get that under control by looking at the average number of posts and if it goes up it implies a manual rewiew. Another rule could be to only allow users with a certain reputation and only articles with a minimum amount of words. Or as you say it: Add other filters.

If such a resteem bot grows popular, it could even charge money if someone wants his content to be added, but without guarantee of a resteem.

*edit*

Something unrelated: Can you give me a subdomain of your herokuapp.com URL (plus some space and a PHP access if possible)? I would give you 5 SBD for it and I want to start building a site for my little witness quality control project.

*edit2*

I just thought that thanks to the public blockchain it would also be possible to automatically resteem content that has been upvoted or  resteemed by certain talented users who are good curators. You basically take a free-ride on their activity.

properties (22)

`author`	doodlebear
`permlink`	re-greer184-re-doodlebear-re-greer184-issues-with-using-stake-to-filter-content-20180219t220317577z
`category`	content
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["content"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2018-02-19 22:03:18
`last_update`	2018-02-19 22:21:15
`depth`	3
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2018-02-26 22:03:18
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	977
`author_reputation`	-1,445,012,251,659
`root_title`	"Issues With Using Stake To Filter Content"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	38,894,018
`net_rshares`	0

@greer184 · Feb 20 '18

So Heroku manages and owns subdomains of herokuapp.com. They allow you to deploy small applications on their servers for free and then charge you if you want to scale up. Unfortunately, I don't own the domain or server space.

properties (22)