Viewing a response to: @krnel/re-jsantana-re-krnel-content-type-value-and-reward-discussion-20161205t164459446z
Are you sure you're not confounding censorship and flagging? I've been watching the alt-Right for some time, but I've been hesitant to evangelize therein even though they're the crew that would like a censorship-resistant platform. I'm hesitant because I assume that some of their more edgy stuff would get flagged. To be frank, I can see why the edgier stuff would be flagged. As a *platform*, Steemit is censorship resistant. But as a *community* with real people, we've got whales & such who serve as benevolent guardians (if you will.) They'll flag offensive stuff; at least, I assume they will. Hence my hesitancy. Speaking of flags, that's a technically feasible way of implementing an NSFW-type policy. Stuff tagged "NSFW" gets assigned a new, special flag that doesn't penalize the poster but hides the post in the same way that regular flagging does. Implementing it this way provides a stick-based incentive to hew to the NSFW policy: "Sequester it on your own, or pay the penalty of a real flagging [and real downvotes for breaking the rule]." We'll work this issue out.
author | nxtblg |
---|---|
permlink | re-krnel-re-jsantana-re-krnel-content-type-value-and-reward-discussion-20161205t172241858z |
category | content |
json_metadata | {"tags":["content"]} |
created | 2016-12-05 17:22:39 |
last_update | 2016-12-05 17:22:39 |
depth | 3 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-01-05 16:25:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 1,086 |
author_reputation | 14,581,363,059,419 |
root_title | "Content-Type Value and Reward Discussion" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 1,924,322 |
net_rshares | 0 |