Viewing a response to: @slobberchops/q5lc3y
Hmm good question, something like linear curation rewards eh? Hmmm. :D Hard to say actually, it might disincentivize distribution and incentivize self-voting and vote-trading again, for the latter I had an idea in mind to discourage it from happening as there's still a lot of it going on and people caught doing it go crazy when they get downvoted and retaliate. Will have to wait for my next post but hmm, I need to think about your question a bit more and run some simulations in my head. :D
author | acidyo |
---|---|
permlink | q5lc9j |
category | curation |
json_metadata | {"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2020-02-12 13:32:06 |
last_update | 2020-02-12 13:32:06 |
depth | 2 |
children | 2 |
last_payout | 2020-02-19 13:32:06 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.016 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.016 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 495 |
author_reputation | 3,364,831,143,983,141 |
root_title | "Curation and trending post-EIP" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 95,368,484 |
net_rshares | 173,176,504,105 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
slobberchops | 0 | 173,176,504,105 | 7% |
Exactly, linear curation based on stake-size without any timing constraints. The whole point of this timing *thing* must have been designed for some kind of reason, but I can't think what that is.
author | slobberchops |
---|---|
permlink | q5ld30 |
category | curation |
json_metadata | {"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2020-02-12 13:49:48 |
last_update | 2020-02-12 13:49:48 |
depth | 3 |
children | 1 |
last_payout | 2020-02-19 13:49:48 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.052 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.053 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 197 |
author_reputation | 2,443,692,175,003,179 |
root_title | "Curation and trending post-EIP" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 95,368,919 |
net_rshares | 540,722,952,671 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
acidyo | 0 | 540,722,952,671 | 4% |
Rewarding content discovery, i.e. newcomers with the penalty to disincentivize bots from voting on everything like @wang used to do very early on in Steem's history. I do wonder how it would work in this day and age with the current rules, though.
author | acidyo |
---|---|
permlink | q5ldiy |
category | curation |
json_metadata | {"users":["wang"],"app":"steemit/0.2"} |
created | 2020-02-12 13:59:24 |
last_update | 2020-02-12 13:59:24 |
depth | 4 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2020-02-19 13:59:24 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 247 |
author_reputation | 3,364,831,143,983,141 |
root_title | "Curation and trending post-EIP" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 95,369,281 |
net_rshares | 0 |