Viewing a response to: @sigmajin/re-clayop-re-sigmajin-an-opponent-of-the-exponent-making-the-case-for-vshare-linearity-20170215t202508563z
Agreed. At least the complex curation game system, such as 30 minutes window and front-running , should be simplified. I'd rather fix reputation (or engagement) system as I suggested than merely removing curation reward. But I think up to 25% of curation reward is quite high compared to efforts for creating contents. Maybe fixed value of around 5% enough?
| author | clayop |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-sigmajin-re-clayop-re-sigmajin-an-opponent-of-the-exponent-making-the-case-for-vshare-linearity-20170215t203228114z |
| category | curation |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["curation"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| created | 2017-02-15 20:32:30 |
| last_update | 2017-02-15 20:32:30 |
| depth | 3 |
| children | 3 |
| last_payout | 2017-03-19 06:26:39 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 357 |
| author_reputation | 270,845,899,918,618 |
| root_title | "An Opponent of the Exponent: Making the Case for Vshare Linearity" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 2,516,600 |
| net_rshares | 33,511,791,089 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| liondani | 0 | 0 | 0% | ||
| sigmajin | 0 | 33,511,791,089 | 100% |
im not sure the reputation system has ever been salvagable. It was a disaster from the moment it was introduced and it has gotten worse. People with currently high reps aren't going to like it, but my answer is shoot it in the head and start fresh with something rational. 5% is too low, IMO. One of the things you have to remember is that the reward is split between many. So on a post that makes 50 bucks with 100 voters, that's going to be like $2.50 split 100 ways. personally, i don't think cutting it in half and removing the reverse auction is a terrible idea. My understanding is that the initial adoption of the reverse auction was somewhat controversial.
| author | sigmajin |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-clayop-re-sigmajin-re-clayop-re-sigmajin-an-opponent-of-the-exponent-making-the-case-for-vshare-linearity-20170215t204638622z |
| category | curation |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["curation"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| created | 2017-02-15 20:46:33 |
| last_update | 2017-02-15 20:48:12 |
| depth | 4 |
| children | 2 |
| last_payout | 2017-03-19 06:26:39 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 672 |
| author_reputation | 35,847,511,233,614 |
| root_title | "An Opponent of the Exponent: Making the Case for Vshare Linearity" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 2,516,709 |
| net_rshares | 33,707,996,046 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sigmajin | 0 | 33,707,996,046 | 100% |
The reverse options encourages people to use bots because it is very hard to catch 30 min time window for 24/7.
| author | clayop |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-sigmajin-re-clayop-re-sigmajin-re-clayop-re-sigmajin-an-opponent-of-the-exponent-making-the-case-for-vshare-linearity-20170215t210253498z |
| category | curation |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["curation"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| created | 2017-02-15 21:02:54 |
| last_update | 2017-02-15 21:02:54 |
| depth | 5 |
| children | 1 |
| last_payout | 2017-03-19 06:26:39 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 111 |
| author_reputation | 270,845,899,918,618 |
| root_title | "An Opponent of the Exponent: Making the Case for Vshare Linearity" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 2,516,837 |
| net_rshares | 33,515,532,362 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sigmajin | 0 | 33,515,532,362 | 100% |
I think smooth's idea about making them less front-loaded would solve a lot of that.
| author | sigmajin |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-clayop-re-sigmajin-re-clayop-re-sigmajin-re-clayop-re-sigmajin-an-opponent-of-the-exponent-making-the-case-for-vshare-linearity-20170216t013206369z |
| category | curation |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["curation"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| created | 2017-02-16 01:32:00 |
| last_update | 2017-02-16 01:32:00 |
| depth | 6 |
| children | 0 |
| last_payout | 2017-03-19 06:26:39 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 84 |
| author_reputation | 35,847,511,233,614 |
| root_title | "An Opponent of the Exponent: Making the Case for Vshare Linearity" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 2,518,689 |
| net_rshares | 15,666,728,877 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sigmajin | 0 | 15,666,728,877 | 100% |
hiveblocks