create account

RE: Using steemauto to support the community by pharesim

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @matt-a/re-pharesim-using-steemauto-to-support-the-community-20191007t161042309z

· @pharesim · (edited)
Thank you so much!
Fixed -50% seems too much for the downvotes, many rounds consist of more than 2 posts so your downvote mana would run out.
A scaled follow would be better for us, as we can calculate the expected follows to each vote that way and prevent "overvoting" below 0.

Fixed 2% for upvotes is safe for the forseeable future :D
properties (22)
authorpharesim
permlinkpz0qnl
categorycuration
json_metadata{"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2019-10-07 19:11:45
last_update2019-10-07 19:14:39
depth2
children3
last_payout2019-10-14 19:11:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length337
author_reputation239,450,405,799,183
root_title"Using steemauto to support the community"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id91,326,327
net_rshares0
@matt-a ·
$0.03
You're welcome, glad this is happening!  I was going for fixed -50% after I looked over the downvote history, looked like it wasn't super frequent.  I'll switch it up to scaled and see how that sustains itself.  Depending on how much 2% up bleeds me out in conjunction with the other trails I'm following, I might be able to turn it up a little bit.
👍  
properties (23)
authormatt-a
permlinkre-pharesim-pz0r1v
categorycuration
json_metadata{"tags":["curation"],"app":"steempeak/1.17.1"}
created2019-10-07 19:20:21
last_update2019-10-07 19:20:21
depth3
children2
last_payout2019-10-14 19:20:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.015 HBD
curator_payout_value0.015 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length349
author_reputation34,621,295,577,150
root_title"Using steemauto to support the community"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id91,326,510
net_rshares170,017,524,064
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@pharesim ·
The downvotes depend on the amount of submissions by our delegators. The admin team tries to make sure there's at least two, as we use 125% each round (12 hours). But when the delegators are active it can be more, the maximum has been 8 so far I think. So 50% would only work when activity is very low ;)

For me personally scaled is more important because we calculate the value of the downvotes and adapt when we would vote < 0$, which would be kind of a waste. It's better when all the trailing votes adapt accordingly.
properties (22)
authorpharesim
permlinkpz0rq3
categorycuration
json_metadata{"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2019-10-07 19:34:51
last_update2019-10-07 19:34:51
depth4
children1
last_payout2019-10-14 19:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length522
author_reputation239,450,405,799,183
root_title"Using steemauto to support the community"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id91,326,864
net_rshares0
@matt-a ·
$0.03
Good points, scaled it is!  Already made the change.
👍  
properties (23)
authormatt-a
permlinkre-pharesim-pz0rw5
categorycuration
json_metadata{"tags":["curation"],"app":"steempeak/1.17.1"}
created2019-10-07 19:38:33
last_update2019-10-07 19:38:33
depth5
children0
last_payout2019-10-14 19:38:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.015 HBD
curator_payout_value0.015 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length52
author_reputation34,621,295,577,150
root_title"Using steemauto to support the community"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id91,326,945
net_rshares166,632,480,415
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)