Viewing a response to: @beanz/the-problem-with-the-current-curation-system
Authors should be able to chose a certain percentage that goes to curators, the same way they can chose to power up 100%. Before posting they would put how much % of their post goes to curators, this way underdog could put a high percentage to attract curators and get more attention. This could be done too to reward comments, basically authors chose how much percentage of their post goes to comments in that post.
| author | snowflake |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-beanz-the-problem-with-the-current-curation-system-20170120t153441890z |
| category | curation |
| json_metadata | ""{\"tags\": [\"curation\"]}"" |
| created | 2017-01-20 15:34:42 |
| last_update | 2017-01-20 15:34:42 |
| depth | 1 |
| children | 2 |
| last_payout | 2017-02-20 03:40:06 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 416 |
| author_reputation | 33,312,252,512,655 |
| root_title | "Incentives to Vote for the Underdog" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 2,297,510 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
I like this idea too. But I think comments should have their own reward pool as planned in the hard fork. I can see that leading to growth
| author | beanz |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-snowflake-re-beanz-the-problem-with-the-current-curation-system-20170120t160000617z |
| category | curation |
| json_metadata | {"tags":["curation"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
| created | 2017-01-20 16:00:06 |
| last_update | 2017-01-20 16:00:06 |
| depth | 2 |
| children | 1 |
| last_payout | 2017-02-20 03:40:06 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 140 |
| author_reputation | 77,215,574,122,930 |
| root_title | "Incentives to Vote for the Underdog" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 2,297,675 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
My concern about having a second pool is for curation rewards as it is the main reason people are buying steem power. I don't really know the impact such changes will have to curators...
| author | snowflake |
|---|---|
| permlink | re-beanz-re-snowflake-re-beanz-the-problem-with-the-current-curation-system-20170120t162110397z |
| category | curation |
| json_metadata | ""{\"tags\": [\"curation\"]}"" |
| created | 2017-01-20 16:21:12 |
| last_update | 2017-01-20 16:21:12 |
| depth | 3 |
| children | 0 |
| last_payout | 2017-02-20 03:40:06 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
| promoted | 0.000 HBD |
| body_length | 186 |
| author_reputation | 33,312,252,512,655 |
| root_title | "Incentives to Vote for the Underdog" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
| percent_hbd | 10,000 |
| post_id | 2,297,833 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
hiveblocks